Real-World Data on the Use of Intravenous Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Central Nervous System Infections: a Subgroup Analysis from the FORTRESS Study.

IF 5.6 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-13 DOI:10.1007/s40121-026-01383-8
Dominik Jarczak, Stefan Kluge, Martin Kieninger, Stefan Hagel, Mathias W Pletz, Michael Zoller, Claudia Spies, Sebastian Kintrup, Lukas Antonitsch, Jörg Zundel, Valerio Del Bono, Valentina Galfo, Marco Falcone, Christina Iasonidou, Loredana Sarmati, Laura Campogiani, Abhijit M Bal, George Dimopoulos, Matthias G Vossen, Claudio M Mastroianni, Klaus-Friedrich Bodmann, Carina Herbst, Christian Mayer
{"title":"Real-World Data on the Use of Intravenous Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Central Nervous System Infections: a Subgroup Analysis from the FORTRESS Study.","authors":"Dominik Jarczak, Stefan Kluge, Martin Kieninger, Stefan Hagel, Mathias W Pletz, Michael Zoller, Claudia Spies, Sebastian Kintrup, Lukas Antonitsch, Jörg Zundel, Valerio Del Bono, Valentina Galfo, Marco Falcone, Christina Iasonidou, Loredana Sarmati, Laura Campogiani, Abhijit M Bal, George Dimopoulos, Matthias G Vossen, Claudio M Mastroianni, Klaus-Friedrich Bodmann, Carina Herbst, Christian Mayer","doi":"10.1007/s40121-026-01383-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Central nervous system (CNS) infections are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and their management is challenged by antimicrobial resistance and limited cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration of many antibiotics. Intravenous fosfomycin (FOS) offers broad-spectrum activity, favourable pharmacokinetics and reliable CSF penetration, making it a potential partner in combination therapy for severe CNS infections. This interim subgroup analysis of the prospective FORTRESS study evaluated real-world treatment patterns, effectiveness and safety of FOS in patients with CNS infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FORTRESS is an ongoing multicentre, non-interventional, international study enrolling patients receiving FOS for severe infections. We analysed patients with documented CNS infections among 1019 enrolled up to June 2025. Effectiveness endpoints at end of treatment (EOT) included clinical success (composite endpoint defined as successful clinical response plus concomitant microbiological cure), successful clinical response (defined as complete or partial resolution of signs and symptoms), microbiological cure, clinical failure and in-hospital mortality. Safety outcomes included adverse drug reactions (ADRs; including serious ADRs) and laboratory parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 patients with CNS infections were included, of which most were critically ill at baseline, with high rates of ICU admission (90.6%), sepsis (42.2%) and mechanical ventilation (35.9%). Included patients were treated for ventriculitis (53.1%), brain abscess/empyema (26.6%), bacterial meningitis (26.6%) and shunt infections (18.8%), mainly caused by Staphylococcus spp. (48.8%). FOS was administered exclusively in combination regimens, generally as second- or third-line therapy, at high daily doses (median 22.1 g/day). At EOT, clinical success was achieved in 82.8% of patients, a successful clinical response in 92.2% and microbiological cure in 85.9%. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 12.5%. Outcomes were especially favourable in bacterial meningitis (94.1% clinical success) and Gram-positive infections (96.6% clinical success). FOS was generally well tolerated. Electrolyte imbalances were the most common ADRs but were mainly mild and did not require treatment modification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These interim real-world data suggest that FOS, used in combination with other antimicrobial agents, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for severely ill patients with CNS infections.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02979951.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"2145-2165"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13350624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-026-01383-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) infections are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and their management is challenged by antimicrobial resistance and limited cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration of many antibiotics. Intravenous fosfomycin (FOS) offers broad-spectrum activity, favourable pharmacokinetics and reliable CSF penetration, making it a potential partner in combination therapy for severe CNS infections. This interim subgroup analysis of the prospective FORTRESS study evaluated real-world treatment patterns, effectiveness and safety of FOS in patients with CNS infections.

Methods: FORTRESS is an ongoing multicentre, non-interventional, international study enrolling patients receiving FOS for severe infections. We analysed patients with documented CNS infections among 1019 enrolled up to June 2025. Effectiveness endpoints at end of treatment (EOT) included clinical success (composite endpoint defined as successful clinical response plus concomitant microbiological cure), successful clinical response (defined as complete or partial resolution of signs and symptoms), microbiological cure, clinical failure and in-hospital mortality. Safety outcomes included adverse drug reactions (ADRs; including serious ADRs) and laboratory parameters.

Results: A total of 64 patients with CNS infections were included, of which most were critically ill at baseline, with high rates of ICU admission (90.6%), sepsis (42.2%) and mechanical ventilation (35.9%). Included patients were treated for ventriculitis (53.1%), brain abscess/empyema (26.6%), bacterial meningitis (26.6%) and shunt infections (18.8%), mainly caused by Staphylococcus spp. (48.8%). FOS was administered exclusively in combination regimens, generally as second- or third-line therapy, at high daily doses (median 22.1 g/day). At EOT, clinical success was achieved in 82.8% of patients, a successful clinical response in 92.2% and microbiological cure in 85.9%. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 12.5%. Outcomes were especially favourable in bacterial meningitis (94.1% clinical success) and Gram-positive infections (96.6% clinical success). FOS was generally well tolerated. Electrolyte imbalances were the most common ADRs but were mainly mild and did not require treatment modification.

Conclusions: These interim real-world data suggest that FOS, used in combination with other antimicrobial agents, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for severely ill patients with CNS infections.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02979951.

静脉注射磷霉素治疗中枢神经系统感染的真实世界数据:来自FORTRESS研究的亚组分析。
中枢神经系统(CNS)感染与高发病率和死亡率相关,其管理受到抗菌素耐药性和许多抗生素脑脊液(CSF)渗透有限的挑战。静脉注射磷霉素(FOS)具有广谱活性、良好的药代动力学和可靠的脑脊液穿透性,使其成为严重中枢神经系统感染联合治疗的潜在合作伙伴。这项前瞻性FORTRESS研究的中期亚组分析评估了FOS在中枢神经系统感染患者中的实际治疗模式、有效性和安全性。方法:FORTRESS是一项正在进行的多中心、非介入性国际研究,纳入了接受FOS治疗的严重感染患者。我们分析了截至2025年6月登记的1019例有记录的中枢神经系统感染患者。治疗结束时的疗效终点(EOT)包括临床成功(复合终点定义为成功的临床反应加上伴随的微生物治愈)、成功的临床反应(定义为体征和症状的完全或部分缓解)、微生物治愈、临床失败和住院死亡率。安全性指标包括药物不良反应(adr,包括严重adr)和实验室参数。结果:共纳入64例中枢神经系统感染患者,其中以危重患者居多,ICU住院率高(90.6%),脓毒症发生率高(42.2%),机械通气率高(35.9%)。其中脑室炎(53.1%)、脑脓肿/脓胸(26.6%)、细菌性脑膜炎(26.6%)和分流感染(18.8%),以葡萄球菌感染为主(48.8%)。FOS仅在联合方案中使用,通常作为二线或三线治疗,每日高剂量(中位数22.1 g/天)。在EOT, 82.8%的患者获得临床成功,92.2%的患者获得成功临床缓解,85.9%的患者获得微生物治愈率。全因住院死亡率为12.5%。结果在细菌性脑膜炎(94.1%的临床成功率)和革兰氏阳性感染(96.6%的临床成功率)中尤其有利。FOS一般耐受良好。电解质失衡是最常见的不良反应,但主要是轻微的,不需要修改治疗。结论:这些真实世界的中期数据表明,FOS与其他抗菌药物联合使用,是一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择,用于中枢神经系统感染的重症患者。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov识别码,NCT02979951。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书