Allergic Contact Dermatitis With Erythema Multiforme-Like Features Induced by Isoconazole Nitrate

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Contact Dermatitis Pub Date : 2026-09-08 Epub Date: 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1111/cod.70204
Giorgia Sbarra, Giuseppe Demichele, Francesca Ambrogio, Alexandre Raphael Meduri, Paolo Antonio Danza, Caterina Foti
{"title":"Allergic Contact Dermatitis With Erythema Multiforme-Like Features Induced by Isoconazole Nitrate","authors":"Giorgia Sbarra,&nbsp;Giuseppe Demichele,&nbsp;Francesca Ambrogio,&nbsp;Alexandre Raphael Meduri,&nbsp;Paolo Antonio Danza,&nbsp;Caterina Foti","doi":"10.1111/cod.70204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Polymorphous eruptions with erythema multiforme-like features represent a rare non-eczematous presentation of allergic contact dermatitis. Unlike true erythema multiforme, these reactions occur in the context of contact sensitization and may show targetoid, erythemato-vesicular, urticarial or oedematous lesions, usually without mucosal involvement [<span>1, 2</span>].</p><p>We report the case of a 22-year-old female student with a history of atopic dermatitis who developed an acute eruption after topical application of Travocort (isoconazole nitrate 1% + diflucortolone valerate 0.1%) for tinea corporis. The reaction started at the application site as an eczematous plaque and, over 14 days, progressed to a widespread polymorphous eruption.</p><p>Clinical examination showed a large erythematous-oedematous plaque on the left lateral trunk with targetoid, urticarial and erythemato-vesicular features, associated with similar lesions involving the inguinal folds and thighs. Direct mycological examination performed at presentation and after clinical resolution was negative.</p><p>Patch tests were performed using the SIDAPA 2023 baseline series (Società Italiana di Dermatologia Allergologica Professionale e Ambientale; SmartPractice, Rome, Italy) in occlusion for 2 days (D2) with allergEAZE patch test chambers (SmartPractice, Phoenix, USA) on Soffix tape (Artsana, Grandate, Italy), and read on D2, D4 and D7 according to ICDRG criteria. Travocort cream was also tested (Figure 1).</p><p>The SIDAPA baseline series was negative at all readings. Travocort cream showed a positive reaction graded ++ at D2, D4 and D7, with erythematous-oedematous and urticarial-like morphology at D4, when photographs were taken. The active components were then tested separately: isoconazole nitrate, CAS 27523-40-6, 1% pet., and diflucortolone valerate, CAS 59198-70-8, 0.1% pet. Isoconazole nitrate showed a typical eczematous reaction graded ++ at D2, D4 and D7, whereas diflucortolone valerate remained negative at all readings.</p><p>The eruption progressively resolved after withdrawal of Travocort and treatment with topical clobetasol propionate.</p><p>In the present case, we describe allergic contact dermatitis to isoconazole nitrate presenting with an unusual polymorphous clinical morphology.</p><p>This presentation required distinction from true erythema multiforme and dermatophytid reaction. True erythema multiforme was considered unlikely because mucosal involvement was absent and the eruption followed topical exposure. Dermatophytid reaction was also considered, given the eruption developed on presumably active tinea corporis; however, the onset at the treated site, rapid spreading after Travocort application, negative direct mycological examination at presentation and positive delayed patch test reactions were more consistent with allergic contact dermatitis.</p><p>Erythema multiforme-like patterns in allergic contact dermatitis remain incompletely understood. Although their relationship with true erythema multiforme is unclear, both may share histological features such as upper dermal lymphoid infiltrate, exocytosis and keratinocyte necrosis, while mucosal involvement is typically absent in contact dermatitis. A type IV hypersensitivity mechanism mediated by sensitized T cells and cytokines, including interleukin-2, interleukin-1, interferon-γ and tumour necrosis factor-α, has been proposed; however, a type III immune-complex mechanism has also been suggested. In a recent systematic review, medicaments were the most frequent allergen category and patch testing confirmed most reported allergens [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Isoconazole is an imidazole antifungal and a recognized, although uncommon, contact sensitizer, usually associated with classical eczematous dermatitis [<span>3, 4</span>]. However, few other atypical presentations have been described, such as erythematous and oedematous spreading lesions [<span>4</span>] and a pustular contact dermatitis, with subcorneal pustules and eosinophils [<span>5</span>]. Our case broadens this clinical spectrum by documenting a polymorphous, targetoid and urticarial-oedematous presentation in confirmed isoconazole sensitization.</p><p>The urticarial-like and erythematous-oedematous morphology observed with Travocort may reflect modification of the reaction pattern by the corticosteroid component, as previously suggested for the same combination product [<span>4</span>] This discrepancy between the finished product and the isolated allergen highlights the importance of testing individual components when corticosteroid-containing preparations produce atypical clinical or patch test morphology.</p><p>\n <b>Francesca Ambrogio:</b> conceptualization, writing – review and editing. <b>Giuseppe Demichele:</b> writing – review and editing, writing – original draft, data curation. <b>Paolo Antonio Danza:</b> writing – review and editing, writing – original draft. <b>Giorgia Sbarra:</b> conceptualization, writing – review and editing, data curation. <b>Caterina Foti:</b> conceptualization, methodology, writing – review and editing, supervision. <b>Alexandre Raphael Meduri:</b> writing – review and editing, writing – original draft.</p><p>Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of the clinical images, in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"95 4","pages":"422-424"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.70204","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cod.70204","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polymorphous eruptions with erythema multiforme-like features represent a rare non-eczematous presentation of allergic contact dermatitis. Unlike true erythema multiforme, these reactions occur in the context of contact sensitization and may show targetoid, erythemato-vesicular, urticarial or oedematous lesions, usually without mucosal involvement [1, 2].

We report the case of a 22-year-old female student with a history of atopic dermatitis who developed an acute eruption after topical application of Travocort (isoconazole nitrate 1% + diflucortolone valerate 0.1%) for tinea corporis. The reaction started at the application site as an eczematous plaque and, over 14 days, progressed to a widespread polymorphous eruption.

Clinical examination showed a large erythematous-oedematous plaque on the left lateral trunk with targetoid, urticarial and erythemato-vesicular features, associated with similar lesions involving the inguinal folds and thighs. Direct mycological examination performed at presentation and after clinical resolution was negative.

Patch tests were performed using the SIDAPA 2023 baseline series (Società Italiana di Dermatologia Allergologica Professionale e Ambientale; SmartPractice, Rome, Italy) in occlusion for 2 days (D2) with allergEAZE patch test chambers (SmartPractice, Phoenix, USA) on Soffix tape (Artsana, Grandate, Italy), and read on D2, D4 and D7 according to ICDRG criteria. Travocort cream was also tested (Figure 1).

The SIDAPA baseline series was negative at all readings. Travocort cream showed a positive reaction graded ++ at D2, D4 and D7, with erythematous-oedematous and urticarial-like morphology at D4, when photographs were taken. The active components were then tested separately: isoconazole nitrate, CAS 27523-40-6, 1% pet., and diflucortolone valerate, CAS 59198-70-8, 0.1% pet. Isoconazole nitrate showed a typical eczematous reaction graded ++ at D2, D4 and D7, whereas diflucortolone valerate remained negative at all readings.

The eruption progressively resolved after withdrawal of Travocort and treatment with topical clobetasol propionate.

In the present case, we describe allergic contact dermatitis to isoconazole nitrate presenting with an unusual polymorphous clinical morphology.

This presentation required distinction from true erythema multiforme and dermatophytid reaction. True erythema multiforme was considered unlikely because mucosal involvement was absent and the eruption followed topical exposure. Dermatophytid reaction was also considered, given the eruption developed on presumably active tinea corporis; however, the onset at the treated site, rapid spreading after Travocort application, negative direct mycological examination at presentation and positive delayed patch test reactions were more consistent with allergic contact dermatitis.

Erythema multiforme-like patterns in allergic contact dermatitis remain incompletely understood. Although their relationship with true erythema multiforme is unclear, both may share histological features such as upper dermal lymphoid infiltrate, exocytosis and keratinocyte necrosis, while mucosal involvement is typically absent in contact dermatitis. A type IV hypersensitivity mechanism mediated by sensitized T cells and cytokines, including interleukin-2, interleukin-1, interferon-γ and tumour necrosis factor-α, has been proposed; however, a type III immune-complex mechanism has also been suggested. In a recent systematic review, medicaments were the most frequent allergen category and patch testing confirmed most reported allergens [2].

Isoconazole is an imidazole antifungal and a recognized, although uncommon, contact sensitizer, usually associated with classical eczematous dermatitis [3, 4]. However, few other atypical presentations have been described, such as erythematous and oedematous spreading lesions [4] and a pustular contact dermatitis, with subcorneal pustules and eosinophils [5]. Our case broadens this clinical spectrum by documenting a polymorphous, targetoid and urticarial-oedematous presentation in confirmed isoconazole sensitization.

The urticarial-like and erythematous-oedematous morphology observed with Travocort may reflect modification of the reaction pattern by the corticosteroid component, as previously suggested for the same combination product [4] This discrepancy between the finished product and the isolated allergen highlights the importance of testing individual components when corticosteroid-containing preparations produce atypical clinical or patch test morphology.

Francesca Ambrogio: conceptualization, writing – review and editing. Giuseppe Demichele: writing – review and editing, writing – original draft, data curation. Paolo Antonio Danza: writing – review and editing, writing – original draft. Giorgia Sbarra: conceptualization, writing – review and editing, data curation. Caterina Foti: conceptualization, methodology, writing – review and editing, supervision. Alexandre Raphael Meduri: writing – review and editing, writing – original draft.

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of the clinical images, in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

硝酸异康唑致过敏性接触性皮炎伴多形性红斑。
多形性红斑样皮疹是一种罕见的非湿疹性过敏性接触性皮炎。与真正的多形性红斑不同,这些反应发生在接触致敏的情况下,可能表现为靶样、红斑水疱、荨麻疹或水肿病变,通常不累及粘膜[1,2]。我们报告一例22岁的女学生,有特应性皮炎病史,局部应用屈伏柯(1%硝酸异康唑+ 0.1%戊酸地氟落酮)治疗体癣后出现急性皮疹。反应开始于应用部位的湿疹斑块,超过14天,进展为广泛的多形疹。临床检查显示左侧干外侧有一个大红斑水肿斑块,伴靶样、荨麻疹和红斑水泡特征,并伴有类似病变累及腹股沟褶皱和大腿。直接真菌学检查在就诊时和临床解决后均为阴性。使用SIDAPA 2023基线系列(societ<s:1> Italiana di Dermatologia allergprofessionale e Ambientale; SmartPractice, Rome, Italy)在封闭状态下(D2)使用allergEAZE贴片试验箱(SmartPractice, Phoenix, USA)在sofffix胶带(Artsana, Grandate, Italy)上进行2天的贴片试验,并根据ICDRG标准在D2, D4和D7上进行阅读。Travocort乳膏也进行了测试(图1)。所有读数的SIDAPA基线系列均为负值。在D2、D4和D7处特拉福柯乳膏呈++级阳性反应,拍照时D4处呈红斑-水肿和荨麻疹样形态。分别测定活性成分:硝酸异康唑、CAS 27523-40-6、1% pet。,和戊酸双氟落酮,CAS 59198-70-8, 0.1% pet。硝酸异康唑在D2、D4和D7处表现为典型的湿疹反应,等级为++,而戊酸双氟落酮在所有读数下均为阴性。在停用特拉福柯和外用丙酸氯倍他索治疗后,皮疹逐渐消退。在目前的情况下,我们描述过敏性接触性皮炎硝酸异康唑呈现一个不寻常的多形临床形态。这种表现需要区别于真正的多形性红斑和皮肤癣反应。真正的多形性红斑被认为不太可能,因为没有粘膜受累,并且局部暴露后出现皮疹。考虑到可能是活跃的体癣上的爆发,也考虑了皮肤癣反应;然而,在治疗部位发病、曲伏柯应用后迅速扩散、就诊时直接真菌学检查阴性和延迟斑贴试验反应阳性更符合过敏性接触性皮炎。过敏性接触性皮炎的多形性红斑样模式尚不完全清楚。虽然它们与真正的多形性红斑的关系尚不清楚,但两者可能具有相同的组织学特征,如真皮上淋巴细胞浸润、胞分泌和角化细胞坏死,而接触性皮炎通常不累及粘膜。已提出致敏T细胞和细胞因子(包括白细胞介素-2、白细胞介素-1、干扰素-γ和肿瘤坏死因子-α)介导的IV型超敏机制;然而,III型免疫复合物机制也被提出。在最近的一项系统综述中,药物是最常见的过敏原类别,而贴片试验证实了大多数报告的过敏原。异康唑是一种咪唑类抗真菌药物,也是一种公认的接触致敏剂,虽然不常见,但通常与典型的湿疹性皮炎有关[3,4]。然而,很少有其他不典型的表现被描述,如红斑和水肿扩散病变[4]和脓疱性接触性皮炎,伴有角膜下脓疱和嗜酸性粒细胞[5]。我们的病例通过记录证实异康唑致敏的多形性、靶样和荨麻疹水肿表现,拓宽了这一临床谱。曲伏曲观察到的荨麻疹样和红斑水肿形态可能反映了皮质类固醇成分对同一组合产品的反应模式的改变,正如之前所建议的那样,成品和分离的过敏原之间的差异强调了当含有皮质类固醇的制剂产生非典型临床或斑贴试验形态时测试单个成分的重要性。弗朗西斯卡·安布罗吉奥:概念、写作、评论和编辑。朱塞佩·德米谢勒:写作-审查和编辑,写作-原稿,数据管理。保罗·安东尼奥·丹扎:写作-审查和编辑,写作-原稿。Giorgia Sbarra:概念化,写作-评论和编辑,数据管理。卡特琳娜·福蒂:概念化,方法论,写作-审查和编辑,监督。 亚历山大·拉斐尔·梅杜里:写作-审查和编辑,写作-原稿。根据《赫尔辛基宣言》的原则,临床图像的出版获得了患者的书面知情同意。作者声明无利益冲突。支持本研究结果的数据可向通讯作者索取。由于隐私或道德限制,这些数据不会公开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
30.90%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contact Dermatitis is designed primarily as a journal for clinicians who are interested in various aspects of environmental dermatitis. This includes both allergic and irritant (toxic) types of contact dermatitis, occupational (industrial) dermatitis and consumers" dermatitis from such products as cosmetics and toiletries. The journal aims at promoting and maintaining communication among dermatologists, industrial physicians, allergists and clinical immunologists, as well as chemists and research workers involved in industry and the production of consumer goods. Papers are invited on clinical observations, diagnosis and methods of investigation of patients, therapeutic measures, organisation and legislation relating to the control of occupational and consumers".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书