Kürşad Özkan, Serkan Özdemir, Bart Muys, Salih Doğan
{"title":"Refining Niche Metric Calculations: A Modified Weighting Approach to Colwell and Futuyma's Method.","authors":"Kürşad Özkan, Serkan Özdemir, Bart Muys, Salih Doğan","doi":"10.1007/s11538-026-01672-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The niche concept is central to ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. To assess resource dynamics in biological communities, the most widely used niche metrics are niche breadth and niche overlap. Colwell and Futuyma (1971) were the first to propose niche metrics that incorporated resource distinctness. In their framework, niche breadth and overlap are calculated using either a relative weighting factor <math> <mfenced><msub><mi>d</mi> <mi>j</mi></msub> </mfenced> </math> or an absolute weighting factor <math> <mfenced><msub><mi>δ</mi> <mi>j</mi></msub> </mfenced> </math> . Hanski (1978) later introduced an alternative weighting factor <math> <mfenced><mmultiscripts><mi>δ</mi> <mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow> <mrow><mrow></mrow> <mo>∗</mo></mrow> </mmultiscripts> </mfenced> </math> , which accounts for both the quality and quantity of resource states in niche calculations. However, metrics based on <math><msub><mi>d</mi> <mi>j</mi></msub> </math> , <math><msub><mi>δ</mi> <mi>j</mi></msub> </math> and <math><mmultiscripts><mi>δ</mi> <mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow> <mrow><mrow></mrow> <mo>∗</mo></mrow> </mmultiscripts> </math> have inherent mathematical and conceptual limitations. To overcome these issues, the present study introduces modified forms of these factors ( <math><mrow><mi>e</mi> <msub><mi>d</mi> <mi>j</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> , <math><mrow><mi>e</mi> <msub><mi>δ</mi> <mi>j</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> and <math><mrow><mi>e</mi> <mmultiscripts><mi>δ</mi> <mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow> <mrow><mrow></mrow> <mo>∗</mo></mrow> </mmultiscripts> </mrow> </math> ) and evaluates their performance using eight hypothetical and one empirical (ecological) resource matrix. The findings indicate that niche metrics incorporating the <math><mrow><mi>e</mi> <msub><mi>d</mi> <mi>j</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> factor represent the most coherent and biologically meaningful option.</p>","PeriodicalId":9372,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","volume":"88 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13263204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-026-01672-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The niche concept is central to ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. To assess resource dynamics in biological communities, the most widely used niche metrics are niche breadth and niche overlap. Colwell and Futuyma (1971) were the first to propose niche metrics that incorporated resource distinctness. In their framework, niche breadth and overlap are calculated using either a relative weighting factor or an absolute weighting factor . Hanski (1978) later introduced an alternative weighting factor , which accounts for both the quality and quantity of resource states in niche calculations. However, metrics based on , and have inherent mathematical and conceptual limitations. To overcome these issues, the present study introduces modified forms of these factors ( , and ) and evaluates their performance using eight hypothetical and one empirical (ecological) resource matrix. The findings indicate that niche metrics incorporating the factor represent the most coherent and biologically meaningful option.
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, the official journal of the Society for Mathematical Biology, disseminates original research findings and other information relevant to the interface of biology and the mathematical sciences. Contributions should have relevance to both fields. In order to accommodate the broad scope of new developments, the journal accepts a variety of contributions, including:
Original research articles focused on new biological insights gained with the help of tools from the mathematical sciences or new mathematical tools and methods with demonstrated applicability to biological investigations
Research in mathematical biology education
Reviews
Commentaries
Perspectives, and contributions that discuss issues important to the profession
All contributions are peer-reviewed.