Prior knowledge interacts with the effects of pre-questions and feedback types on learning from videos: Eye-tracking and cognitive load evidence

IF 13 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
British Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2026-06-12 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI:10.1111/bjet.70046
Qian Huangfu, Tingting Deng, Yujia Guo, Yuman Li, Ruonan Feng, Zixuan Wang
{"title":"Prior knowledge interacts with the effects of pre-questions and feedback types on learning from videos: Eye-tracking and cognitive load evidence","authors":"Qian Huangfu,&nbsp;Tingting Deng,&nbsp;Yujia Guo,&nbsp;Yuman Li,&nbsp;Ruonan Feng,&nbsp;Zixuan Wang","doi":"10.1111/bjet.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Instructional videos increasingly supplement formal education, yet the efficacy of design elements (e.g. pre-questions and feedback) remains underexplored, particularly regarding interactions with learners' prior knowledge. This study involving 352 Chinese university students employed a 2 (prior knowledge: low/high) × 4 (instructional intervention conditions: no pre-questions; pre-questions without feedback; pre-questions with simple feedback; pre-questions with elaborated feedback) experimental design, using eye-tracking to measure attention allocation (time to first fixation, dwell time, total fixation duration) and analysing cognitive load, learning efficiency, retention and transfer via two-way ANOVA. Research has indicated that intrinsic cognitive load was mostly influenced by existing knowledge and was not significantly impacted by the instructional intervention. Extraneous cognitive load and germane cognitive load showed a prior knowledge × intervention interaction: under low prior knowledge, pre-questions with elaborated feedback yielded lower extraneous load and higher germane load, whereas no pre-questions yielded higher extraneous load and lower germane load; under extensive previous knowledge, no pre-questions or simple feedback produced lower extraneous load without suppressing germane load, while elaborated feedback increased extraneous load due to redundancy. Pre-questions universally reduced time to first fixation, indicating quicker attention capture, while simple feedback increased dwell time on critical content, fostering deeper engagement. Retention was highest for low-knowledge learners using pre-questions without feedback, whereas transfer performance depended more on prior knowledge than instructional design. Findings suggest tailoring videos to learners: Novices benefit from pre-questions with simple or no feedback, while experienced learners gain equally from simpler designs without needing elaborated feedback. Pre-questions effectively guide attention, making them ideal for scalable online education.</p><p>\n \n </p>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"57 4","pages":"1115-1139"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.70046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Instructional videos increasingly supplement formal education, yet the efficacy of design elements (e.g. pre-questions and feedback) remains underexplored, particularly regarding interactions with learners' prior knowledge. This study involving 352 Chinese university students employed a 2 (prior knowledge: low/high) × 4 (instructional intervention conditions: no pre-questions; pre-questions without feedback; pre-questions with simple feedback; pre-questions with elaborated feedback) experimental design, using eye-tracking to measure attention allocation (time to first fixation, dwell time, total fixation duration) and analysing cognitive load, learning efficiency, retention and transfer via two-way ANOVA. Research has indicated that intrinsic cognitive load was mostly influenced by existing knowledge and was not significantly impacted by the instructional intervention. Extraneous cognitive load and germane cognitive load showed a prior knowledge × intervention interaction: under low prior knowledge, pre-questions with elaborated feedback yielded lower extraneous load and higher germane load, whereas no pre-questions yielded higher extraneous load and lower germane load; under extensive previous knowledge, no pre-questions or simple feedback produced lower extraneous load without suppressing germane load, while elaborated feedback increased extraneous load due to redundancy. Pre-questions universally reduced time to first fixation, indicating quicker attention capture, while simple feedback increased dwell time on critical content, fostering deeper engagement. Retention was highest for low-knowledge learners using pre-questions without feedback, whereas transfer performance depended more on prior knowledge than instructional design. Findings suggest tailoring videos to learners: Novices benefit from pre-questions with simple or no feedback, while experienced learners gain equally from simpler designs without needing elaborated feedback. Pre-questions effectively guide attention, making them ideal for scalable online education.

先验知识与预提问和反馈类型对视频学习的影响相互作用:眼动追踪和认知负荷证据
教学视频越来越多地补充了正规教育,但设计元素(如预先提问和反馈)的有效性仍未得到充分探索,特别是与学习者先前知识的互动。本研究采用2(先验知识:低/高)× 4(教学干预条件:无前题、前题无反馈、前题有简单反馈、前题有详细反馈)实验设计,采用眼动法测量注意分配(首次注视时间、停留时间、总注视时间),并通过双因素方差分析分析认知负荷、学习效率、保留和迁移。研究表明,学生的内在认知负荷主要受现有知识的影响,而教学干预对其影响不显著。外在认知负荷和关联认知负荷表现出先验知识与干预的交互作用:在低先验知识条件下,有详细反馈的预题产生较低的外在负荷和较高的关联负荷,而无预题产生较高的外在负荷和较低的关联负荷;在广泛的先验知识下,没有预先问题或简单的反馈产生较低的无关负载而不抑制相关负载,而详细的反馈由于冗余而增加了无关负载。预先提问普遍减少了第一次固定的时间,表明更快的注意力捕获,而简单的反馈增加了对关键内容的停留时间,促进了更深层次的参与。使用无反馈的预题的低知识学习者的记忆率最高,而迁移表现更多地依赖于先前的知识而不是教学设计。研究结果建议为学习者量身定制视频:新手可以从简单或没有反馈的预先问题中受益,而有经验的学习者同样可以从更简单的设计中获益,而不需要详细的反馈。预先的问题有效地引导注意力,使其成为可扩展的在线教育的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书