Exploring Under-Researched Operational Barriers Affecting Willingness to Work as Last-Mile Crowdshippers: Evidence From Slovenia, the Czech Republic, and Ukraine

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Patricija Bajec, Halyna V. Pivtorak
{"title":"Exploring Under-Researched Operational Barriers Affecting Willingness to Work as Last-Mile Crowdshippers: Evidence From Slovenia, the Czech Republic, and Ukraine","authors":"Patricija Bajec,&nbsp;Halyna V. Pivtorak","doi":"10.1155/atr/8334347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Last-mile crowdshipping, where individuals voluntarily transport parcels, offers solutions for urban logistics but struggles to recruit enough participants—termed ‘critical mass’—to serve as willing to work (WTW) crowdshippers. While previous studies have primarily focused on sociodemographic factors influencing WTW in Western and Southern Europe, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding operational barriers that have received limited research attention, such as privacy, safety, and regulatory challenges in Eastern and Central European countries. This study aims to fill this gap by identifying and evaluating the significance of these rarely examined content-specific barriers that affect WTW. We conducted a comparative analysis in Slovenia, the Czech Republic, and Ukraine to better understand how cultural, economic, and regulatory differences influence these barriers. To achieve this, we employed a mixed-method approach that included surveys, factor analysis, and fuzzy logic to assess the impact of these barriers on two key groups: students and employees. Our study showed strong support for crowdshipping in all three countries. The delivery efficiency and convenience factor (DECF) group ranked highest among Slovenian and Czech participants and second highest among Ukrainian respondents. Both students and employees consistently prioritised this group. In contrast, the privacy and trust-related factor (PTRF) group was the least significant in Slovenia and the Czech Republic and the second least significant in Ukraine. Notably, more barriers were significant for employees than for students, and Ukrainian participants showed the greatest alignment between the two groups. These insights have important implications for crowdshipping providers and policymakers, highlighting the need to address specific operational challenges to enhance participation. This study not only contributes to practical applications but also advances theoretical understanding by providing new insights into underexplored operational barriers and by expanding crowdshipping research into Eastern and Central Europe through comparative analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/atr/8334347","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/atr/8334347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Last-mile crowdshipping, where individuals voluntarily transport parcels, offers solutions for urban logistics but struggles to recruit enough participants—termed ‘critical mass’—to serve as willing to work (WTW) crowdshippers. While previous studies have primarily focused on sociodemographic factors influencing WTW in Western and Southern Europe, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding operational barriers that have received limited research attention, such as privacy, safety, and regulatory challenges in Eastern and Central European countries. This study aims to fill this gap by identifying and evaluating the significance of these rarely examined content-specific barriers that affect WTW. We conducted a comparative analysis in Slovenia, the Czech Republic, and Ukraine to better understand how cultural, economic, and regulatory differences influence these barriers. To achieve this, we employed a mixed-method approach that included surveys, factor analysis, and fuzzy logic to assess the impact of these barriers on two key groups: students and employees. Our study showed strong support for crowdshipping in all three countries. The delivery efficiency and convenience factor (DECF) group ranked highest among Slovenian and Czech participants and second highest among Ukrainian respondents. Both students and employees consistently prioritised this group. In contrast, the privacy and trust-related factor (PTRF) group was the least significant in Slovenia and the Czech Republic and the second least significant in Ukraine. Notably, more barriers were significant for employees than for students, and Ukrainian participants showed the greatest alignment between the two groups. These insights have important implications for crowdshipping providers and policymakers, highlighting the need to address specific operational challenges to enhance participation. This study not only contributes to practical applications but also advances theoretical understanding by providing new insights into underexplored operational barriers and by expanding crowdshipping research into Eastern and Central Europe through comparative analysis.

Abstract Image

探索未被充分研究的影响最后一英里众包商工作意愿的操作障碍:来自斯洛文尼亚、捷克共和国和乌克兰的证据
个人自愿运输包裹的“最后一英里”众包为城市物流提供了解决方案,但很难招募到足够多的参与者——被称为“临界质量”——作为愿意工作的众包承运者。虽然以前的研究主要集中在西欧和南欧影响WTW的社会人口因素上,但在操作障碍方面存在显著的知识差距,这些障碍得到了有限的研究关注,例如东欧和中欧国家的隐私、安全和监管挑战。本研究旨在通过识别和评估这些很少被研究的影响WTW的特定内容障碍的重要性来填补这一空白。我们在斯洛文尼亚、捷克共和国和乌克兰进行了比较分析,以更好地了解文化、经济和监管差异如何影响这些障碍。为了实现这一目标,我们采用了一种混合方法,包括调查、因素分析和模糊逻辑来评估这些障碍对两个关键群体的影响:学生和员工。我们的研究显示,这三个国家都大力支持众筹。交付效率和便利因素(DECF)组在斯洛文尼亚和捷克参与者中排名最高,在乌克兰受访者中排名第二。学生和员工都始终把这个群体放在首位。相比之下,隐私和信任相关因素(PTRF)组在斯洛文尼亚和捷克共和国是最不重要的,在乌克兰是第二不重要的。值得注意的是,与学生相比,员工面临的障碍更多,乌克兰参与者在这两个群体之间表现出最大的一致性。这些见解对众包供应商和政策制定者具有重要意义,强调了解决具体运营挑战以提高参与度的必要性。本研究不仅有助于实际应用,而且通过对未被探索的操作障碍提供新的见解,并通过比较分析将众筹研究扩展到东欧和中欧,从而促进了理论理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Transportation
Journal of Advanced Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Transportation (JAT) is a fully peer reviewed international journal in transportation research areas related to public transit, road traffic, transport networks and air transport. It publishes theoretical and innovative papers on analysis, design, operations, optimization and planning of multi-modal transport networks, transit & traffic systems, transport technology and traffic safety. Urban rail and bus systems, Pedestrian studies, traffic flow theory and control, Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) and automated and/or connected vehicles are some topics of interest. Highway engineering, railway engineering and logistics do not fall within the aims and scope of JAT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书