Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Performance of Biological Processes in the Treatment of Organic Matter From Dairy Wastewater

IF 2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ncumisa Mpongwana, Phumza Vuyokazi Zungu, Sheena Kumari, Ismail Rawat, Faizal Bux
{"title":"Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Performance of Biological Processes in the Treatment of Organic Matter From Dairy Wastewater","authors":"Ncumisa Mpongwana,&nbsp;Phumza Vuyokazi Zungu,&nbsp;Sheena Kumari,&nbsp;Ismail Rawat,&nbsp;Faizal Bux","doi":"10.1002/clen.70223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dairy wastewater has raised many concerns because it is highly contaminated with high levels of organic matter. The major sources of contaminants in dairy wastewater are clean-in-place products, which are used to sanitize production lines, and whey, which is a byproduct of cheese and pressed yogurt. Various biological treatment technologies are suggested for the treatment of dairy wastewater. However, selecting the appropriate technology for dairy processes may be difficult, considering the multiple options available. Hence, 39 articles reporting various biological treatment processes were compiled to assess effective treatment technology. Four biological treatment processes, namely, constructed wetland (CW), algae technology (ALGAE), activated sludge technology (AS), and a combination of algae and activated sludge technology (AS + ALGAE), were assessed. A quantitative meta-analysis was used to compare the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency of these technologies. The result indicated that there was no significant difference in removal efficiencies of all four processes; however, AS and Algae emerged as better technologies to treat high organic loading dairy wastewater. Although CW and AS + ALGAE were also shown to be effective, the studies assessed show that there's a significant difference in HRT of CW compared to other processes, with CW having the longest HRT (30.2 days). Moreover, there was also a significant difference in influent COD used in all studies that employed AS + ALGAE, with all the papers pooled in this technology using low organic loadings compared to the experimental studies of other processes. The results highlighted suitable biological treatment processes based on the dairy wastewater characteristics of the process.</p>","PeriodicalId":10306,"journal":{"name":"Clean-soil Air Water","volume":"54 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clen.70223","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean-soil Air Water","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clen.70223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dairy wastewater has raised many concerns because it is highly contaminated with high levels of organic matter. The major sources of contaminants in dairy wastewater are clean-in-place products, which are used to sanitize production lines, and whey, which is a byproduct of cheese and pressed yogurt. Various biological treatment technologies are suggested for the treatment of dairy wastewater. However, selecting the appropriate technology for dairy processes may be difficult, considering the multiple options available. Hence, 39 articles reporting various biological treatment processes were compiled to assess effective treatment technology. Four biological treatment processes, namely, constructed wetland (CW), algae technology (ALGAE), activated sludge technology (AS), and a combination of algae and activated sludge technology (AS + ALGAE), were assessed. A quantitative meta-analysis was used to compare the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency of these technologies. The result indicated that there was no significant difference in removal efficiencies of all four processes; however, AS and Algae emerged as better technologies to treat high organic loading dairy wastewater. Although CW and AS + ALGAE were also shown to be effective, the studies assessed show that there's a significant difference in HRT of CW compared to other processes, with CW having the longest HRT (30.2 days). Moreover, there was also a significant difference in influent COD used in all studies that employed AS + ALGAE, with all the papers pooled in this technology using low organic loadings compared to the experimental studies of other processes. The results highlighted suitable biological treatment processes based on the dairy wastewater characteristics of the process.

Abstract Image

生物工艺处理乳制品废水中有机物性能的荟萃分析和系统综述
乳制品废水引起了许多关注,因为它被高水平的有机物质严重污染。乳制品废水中污染物的主要来源是用于生产线消毒的就地清洁产品,以及乳清,乳清是奶酪和压榨酸奶的副产品。针对乳业废水的处理,提出了多种生物处理技术。然而,考虑到多种可用的选择,为乳制品加工选择合适的技术可能是困难的。因此,汇编了39篇报道各种生物处理工艺的文章,以评估有效的处理技术。对人工湿地(CW)、藻类技术(algae)、活性污泥技术(AS)和藻类与活性污泥联合技术(AS + algae)四种生物处理工艺进行了评价。采用定量荟萃分析比较了这些技术的化学需氧量(COD)去除效率。结果表明,4种工艺的去除率无显著差异;然而,AS和藻类是处理高有机负荷乳制品废水的较好技术。虽然CW和AS + ALGAE也被证明是有效的,但评估的研究表明,CW的HRT与其他方法相比存在显著差异,CW的HRT最长(30.2天)。此外,在所有使用AS + ALGAE的研究中,使用的进水COD也存在显著差异,与其他工艺的实验研究相比,该技术汇集的所有论文都使用了低有机负荷。根据乳业废水的特点,提出了合适的生物处理工艺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clean-soil Air Water
Clean-soil Air Water 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: CLEAN covers all aspects of Sustainability and Environmental Safety. The journal focuses on organ/human--environment interactions giving interdisciplinary insights on a broad range of topics including air pollution, waste management, the water cycle, and environmental conservation. With a 2019 Journal Impact Factor of 1.603 (Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2020), the journal publishes an attractive mixture of peer-reviewed scientific reviews, research papers, and short communications. Papers dealing with environmental sustainability issues from such fields as agriculture, biological sciences, energy, food sciences, geography, geology, meteorology, nutrition, soil and water sciences, etc., are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书