Reef fish assemblages impacted by sponges overgrowing corals

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2026-06-09 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70667
Saúl González-Murcia, Merrick Ekins, Christopher N. Battershill, Geoffrey P. Jones
{"title":"Reef fish assemblages impacted by sponges overgrowing corals","authors":"Saúl González-Murcia,&nbsp;Merrick Ekins,&nbsp;Christopher N. Battershill,&nbsp;Geoffrey P. Jones","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Numerous stressors are driving long-term declines in coral cover on coral reefs, significantly impacting reef fish biodiversity and community structure. The benthic space made available by declining coral cover is often occupied by increases in other organisms, including macroalgae, encrusting ascidians, and sponges. Using a combined observational and experimental approach, we examined whether encrusting sponges impact fish communities as they replace corals on degraded reefs. First, fish assemblages were compared across 36 quadrats (3 × 3 m) with sponge cover ranging from 0% to 60%, primarily comprised of the species <i>Lamellodysidea</i> cf. <i>chlorea</i> and <i>Lamellodysidea</i> sp. Second, we quantified fish responses to the experimental removal of sponges from 12 additional quadrats with high sponge cover (&gt;20%). High sponge cover (&gt;20%) was associated with a significant reduction in fish abundance (39% fewer individuals) and species richness (26% fewer species) compared to areas with lower sponge coverage. While these differences showed some correlation with reduced substratum complexity, they were independent of coral cover and depth. Distinct fish communities were associated with high and low sponge coverage. High-sponge areas were dominated by larger species, such as the surgeonfish <i>Ctenochaetus tominiensis</i>, damselfishes <i>Neoglyphidodon nigroris</i> and <i>Amblyglyphidodon leucogaster</i>, and snapper <i>Lutjanus biguttatus</i>. In contrast, areas with less than 20% sponge cover primarily hosted smaller cryptobenthic and coral-associated fish species. Interestingly, experimental sponge removal did not affect overall fish abundance or species richness after 100 days, as both removal and control sites showed similar temporal increases. However, significant differences in fish community composition emerged within just 7 days post-removal. High-sponge areas retained distinct assemblages, containing 42 exclusive species (38% of total), including characteristic residents like <i>Ctenochaetus binotatus</i>, <i>N. nigroris</i>, and <i>L. biguttatus</i>. Conversely, sponge removal zones attracted 18 unique species (21%), predominantly generalist and rubble-associated fishes such as <i>Pomacentrus aurifrons</i> and <i>Apogon neotes</i>, revealing rapid but transient shifts in community structure following habitat modification. These results indicate that encrusting sponges exert a substantial influence on local fish assemblages. The differences between the observational and experimental results likely reflect both long-term and short-term effects of encrusting sponges on coral reef fish communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70667","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70667","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous stressors are driving long-term declines in coral cover on coral reefs, significantly impacting reef fish biodiversity and community structure. The benthic space made available by declining coral cover is often occupied by increases in other organisms, including macroalgae, encrusting ascidians, and sponges. Using a combined observational and experimental approach, we examined whether encrusting sponges impact fish communities as they replace corals on degraded reefs. First, fish assemblages were compared across 36 quadrats (3 × 3 m) with sponge cover ranging from 0% to 60%, primarily comprised of the species Lamellodysidea cf. chlorea and Lamellodysidea sp. Second, we quantified fish responses to the experimental removal of sponges from 12 additional quadrats with high sponge cover (>20%). High sponge cover (>20%) was associated with a significant reduction in fish abundance (39% fewer individuals) and species richness (26% fewer species) compared to areas with lower sponge coverage. While these differences showed some correlation with reduced substratum complexity, they were independent of coral cover and depth. Distinct fish communities were associated with high and low sponge coverage. High-sponge areas were dominated by larger species, such as the surgeonfish Ctenochaetus tominiensis, damselfishes Neoglyphidodon nigroris and Amblyglyphidodon leucogaster, and snapper Lutjanus biguttatus. In contrast, areas with less than 20% sponge cover primarily hosted smaller cryptobenthic and coral-associated fish species. Interestingly, experimental sponge removal did not affect overall fish abundance or species richness after 100 days, as both removal and control sites showed similar temporal increases. However, significant differences in fish community composition emerged within just 7 days post-removal. High-sponge areas retained distinct assemblages, containing 42 exclusive species (38% of total), including characteristic residents like Ctenochaetus binotatus, N. nigroris, and L. biguttatus. Conversely, sponge removal zones attracted 18 unique species (21%), predominantly generalist and rubble-associated fishes such as Pomacentrus aurifrons and Apogon neotes, revealing rapid but transient shifts in community structure following habitat modification. These results indicate that encrusting sponges exert a substantial influence on local fish assemblages. The differences between the observational and experimental results likely reflect both long-term and short-term effects of encrusting sponges on coral reef fish communities.

Abstract Image

珊瑚鱼群受到海绵过度生长珊瑚的影响
许多压力因素导致珊瑚礁覆盖面积长期下降,严重影响了珊瑚礁鱼类的生物多样性和群落结构。由于珊瑚覆盖面积减少而腾出的底栖生物空间,往往被其他生物的增加所占据,包括大型藻类、海鞘和海绵。采用观察和实验相结合的方法,我们研究了在退化的珊瑚礁上取代珊瑚时,硬壳海绵是否会影响鱼类群落。首先,比较了海绵覆盖范围为0% - 60%的36个样方(3 × 3 m)内的鱼类组合,主要由Lamellodysidea cf. chlorrea和Lamellodysidea sp.组成。其次,我们量化了在另外12个高海绵覆盖(>20%)的样方中实验移除海绵时鱼类的反应。与海绵盖度较低的地区相比,高海绵盖度(20%)与鱼类丰度(减少39%)和物种丰富度(减少26%)显著降低相关。虽然这些差异与底层复杂性的降低有一定的相关性,但它们与珊瑚覆盖和深度无关。不同的鱼类群落与海绵覆盖的高低相关。高海绵区主要以大型物种为主,如刺尾鱼(Ctenochaetus tominiensis)、豆鲷(Neoglyphidodon nigoris)和Amblyglyphidodon leucogaster)和鲷鱼(Lutjanus biguttatus)。相比之下,海绵覆盖率低于20%的地区主要是较小的隐底生物和与珊瑚相关的鱼类。有趣的是,实验海绵移除在100天后没有影响整体鱼类丰度或物种丰富度,因为移除和对照地点都显示出相似的时间增长。然而,在移除后仅7天内,鱼类群落组成就出现了显著差异。高海绵区保留了独特的物种组合,包含42种特有物种(占总数的38%),包括典型的居民,如毛毡us binotatus、N. nigroris和L. bigutatus。相反,海绵去除区吸引了18种独特的物种(21%),主要是一般鱼类和与碎石相关的鱼类,如Pomacentrus aurifrons和Apogon netes,表明栖息地改变后群落结构发生了快速而短暂的变化。这些结果表明,包壳海绵对当地鱼类群落具有重要影响。观测结果和实验结果之间的差异可能反映了覆盖海绵对珊瑚礁鱼类群落的长期和短期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书