Comprehensive Analysis of Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Incidents in South Korea Based on Statistical Investigation and Hypothesis-Based Failure Analysis: Ignition Mechanisms and Thermal Runaway Suppression Strategies
Byeongseok Kim, Jinsung Jin, Youjin Jeon, Juwhan Kim, Siyoung Kim, Sangho Park
{"title":"Comprehensive Analysis of Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Incidents in South Korea Based on Statistical Investigation and Hypothesis-Based Failure Analysis: Ignition Mechanisms and Thermal Runaway Suppression Strategies","authors":"Byeongseok Kim, Jinsung Jin, Youjin Jeon, Juwhan Kim, Siyoung Kim, Sangho Park","doi":"10.1007/s10694-026-01936-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) rapidly expand into electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems (ESSs), rising fire incidents have intensified safety concerns. This study analyzes a unique dataset of 161 EV and 58 ESS fire incidents officially reported in South Korea since 2017, providing a rare basis for systematic fire cause assessment. By integrating official government investigation reports with a hypothesis-based analytical framework, the results suggest that LIB fires arise from synergistic interactions between electrochemical instabilities, environmental stressors, and system-level vulnerabilities, rather than from a single root cause. Representative failure hypotheses are evaluated using reproduction experiment results and field investigation data reported by national investigation committees, allowing identification of dominant ignition and propagation pathways. Based on these empirical findings, we propose targeted mitigation strategies across three levels: materials-level innovations (e.g., electrolyte and separator engineering), system-level safety architectures (e.g., advanced thermal management), and operational and regulatory frameworks informed by real-world fire statistics. In this work explicitly links empirical fire incident statistics with mechanistic validation, providing a structured perspective on battery fire safety. These insights may offer practical guidance for battery designers, system integrators, and policymakers to mitigate thermal runaway risks and support the sustainable growth of the EV and ESS industries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":558,"journal":{"name":"Fire Technology","volume":"62 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-026-01936-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) rapidly expand into electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems (ESSs), rising fire incidents have intensified safety concerns. This study analyzes a unique dataset of 161 EV and 58 ESS fire incidents officially reported in South Korea since 2017, providing a rare basis for systematic fire cause assessment. By integrating official government investigation reports with a hypothesis-based analytical framework, the results suggest that LIB fires arise from synergistic interactions between electrochemical instabilities, environmental stressors, and system-level vulnerabilities, rather than from a single root cause. Representative failure hypotheses are evaluated using reproduction experiment results and field investigation data reported by national investigation committees, allowing identification of dominant ignition and propagation pathways. Based on these empirical findings, we propose targeted mitigation strategies across three levels: materials-level innovations (e.g., electrolyte and separator engineering), system-level safety architectures (e.g., advanced thermal management), and operational and regulatory frameworks informed by real-world fire statistics. In this work explicitly links empirical fire incident statistics with mechanistic validation, providing a structured perspective on battery fire safety. These insights may offer practical guidance for battery designers, system integrators, and policymakers to mitigate thermal runaway risks and support the sustainable growth of the EV and ESS industries.
期刊介绍:
Fire Technology publishes original contributions, both theoretical and empirical, that contribute to the solution of problems in fire safety science and engineering. It is the leading journal in the field, publishing applied research dealing with the full range of actual and potential fire hazards facing humans and the environment. It covers the entire domain of fire safety science and engineering problems relevant in industrial, operational, cultural, and environmental applications, including modeling, testing, detection, suppression, human behavior, wildfires, structures, and risk analysis.
The aim of Fire Technology is to push forward the frontiers of knowledge and technology by encouraging interdisciplinary communication of significant technical developments in fire protection and subjects of scientific interest to the fire protection community at large.
It is published in conjunction with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE). The mission of NFPA is to help save lives and reduce loss with information, knowledge, and passion. The mission of SFPE is advancing the science and practice of fire protection engineering internationally.