Evaluation of radiation dose parameters during exposure in cerebral computed tomography angiography

IF 3.5 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Nouf Abuhadi
{"title":"Evaluation of radiation dose parameters during exposure in cerebral computed tomography angiography","authors":"Nouf Abuhadi","doi":"10.1016/j.jrras.2026.102420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to evaluate the radiation doses for patients during cerebral angiographic computed tomography (CTA) scans using two multidetector CT scanners (MDCTs), to reduce these doses, and to determine institutional diagnostic reference levels (iDRLs). A total of 244 patients were included in the study; 131 (53.7%) were examined using the routine protocol, whereas 113 (46.3%) underwent the dose reduction protocol. All examinations were carried out using two 64-slice MDCT scanners at the radiology department of a Southern-Region of Saudi Arabia hospital: a GE Healthcare, and Siemens scanners. Dose length product (DLP, mGy.cm) and mean volume CT dose index (CTDI, mGy) were used as the dose descriptors according to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommendations. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26). The overall iDRLs for CTDI<sub>vol</sub> and DLP were 64.9 mGy and 2184.4 mGy cm, respectively. These iDRLs, particularly for the DLP, were higher than the reference values for individual CT scans in Saudi Arabia (1026 mGy.cm) as proposed by the Saudi Food and Drug Administration (SFDA), which potentially indicated that these patients had undergone multiple or complex procedures. Notably, the overall radiation burdens were considerably influenced by variables other than age, gender, or duration of exposure. To maintain the minimum dose requirements without compromising diagnostic accuracy, these findings highlight the importance of focusing on the cumulative DLP, particularly for repeated or prolonged scans. The findings also stress the need for the regular review and updating of imaging methods and provide vital information for improving CT procedures and enhancing patient safety by using more effective dose reduction techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","volume":"19 2","pages":"Article 102420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850726002633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the radiation doses for patients during cerebral angiographic computed tomography (CTA) scans using two multidetector CT scanners (MDCTs), to reduce these doses, and to determine institutional diagnostic reference levels (iDRLs). A total of 244 patients were included in the study; 131 (53.7%) were examined using the routine protocol, whereas 113 (46.3%) underwent the dose reduction protocol. All examinations were carried out using two 64-slice MDCT scanners at the radiology department of a Southern-Region of Saudi Arabia hospital: a GE Healthcare, and Siemens scanners. Dose length product (DLP, mGy.cm) and mean volume CT dose index (CTDI, mGy) were used as the dose descriptors according to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommendations. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26). The overall iDRLs for CTDIvol and DLP were 64.9 mGy and 2184.4 mGy cm, respectively. These iDRLs, particularly for the DLP, were higher than the reference values for individual CT scans in Saudi Arabia (1026 mGy.cm) as proposed by the Saudi Food and Drug Administration (SFDA), which potentially indicated that these patients had undergone multiple or complex procedures. Notably, the overall radiation burdens were considerably influenced by variables other than age, gender, or duration of exposure. To maintain the minimum dose requirements without compromising diagnostic accuracy, these findings highlight the importance of focusing on the cumulative DLP, particularly for repeated or prolonged scans. The findings also stress the need for the regular review and updating of imaging methods and provide vital information for improving CT procedures and enhancing patient safety by using more effective dose reduction techniques.
脑ct血管造影中辐照剂量参数的评价
本研究旨在评估患者在使用两台多探测器CT扫描仪(mdct)进行脑血管造影计算机断层扫描(CTA)时的辐射剂量,以减少这些剂量,并确定机构诊断参考水平(iDRLs)。研究共纳入244例患者;131例(53.7%)采用常规方案,113例(46.3%)采用剂量减少方案。所有检查均在沙特阿拉伯南部地区一家医院的放射科使用两台64层MDCT扫描仪进行:一台GE医疗保健和一台西门子扫描仪。剂量长度积(DLP, mGy)根据国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)的建议,使用平均体积CT剂量指数(CTDI, mGy)作为剂量描述符。数据分析使用IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26)。CTDIvol和DLP的总iDRLs分别为64.9 mGy和2184.4 mGy cm。这些iDRLs,特别是DLP,高于沙特阿拉伯个人CT扫描的参考值(1026 mGy)。沙特食品和药物管理局(SFDA)建议的cm),这可能表明这些患者经历了多次或复杂的手术。值得注意的是,总体辐射负担在很大程度上受年龄、性别或照射时间以外的变量影响。为了在不影响诊断准确性的情况下保持最低剂量要求,这些发现强调了关注累积DLP的重要性,特别是对于重复或长时间扫描。研究结果还强调了定期审查和更新成像方法的必要性,并为改进CT程序和通过使用更有效的剂量减少技术提高患者安全提供了重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and applications of nuclear, radiation and isotopes in biology, medicine, drugs, biochemistry, microbiology, agriculture, entomology, food technology, chemistry, physics, solid states, engineering, environmental and applied sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书