Blood viscosity values for predicting pathological stroke types (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke mimic) at DR. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital.

Marco Lius, Sri Suryo Adiyanti, Al Rasyid, Yusra, Astuti Giantini, Ro Shinta Christina Solin
{"title":"Blood viscosity values for predicting pathological stroke types (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke mimic) at DR. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital.","authors":"Marco Lius, Sri Suryo Adiyanti, Al Rasyid, Yusra, Astuti Giantini, Ro Shinta Christina Solin","doi":"10.1177/13860291261456431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionStroke is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, and its management differs among ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke mimics. Non-contrast CT has limited sensitivity for early ischemia. This study compared blood and plasma viscosity across different stroke types and identified cutoff values for predicting stroke type.MethodA cross-sectional study at the Emergency Department of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital (March-June 2025). Blood and plasma viscosity were measured using the Neo Digital Microcapillary device then compared using appropriate statistic tests. A <i>p</i>-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSeventy of 97 suspect stroke patients were included (36 ischemic, 16 hemorrhagic, 18 mimics). There were significant differences of blood viscocity between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke compared with stroke mimic (median 5.65 cP ischemic; 5.29 cP hemorrhagic; 4.84 cP mimic; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), whereas no significant difference was observed in plasma viscosity across the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.411). A blood viscosity cutoff of 5.17 cP yielded an AUC of 0.84 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), 71.2% sensitivity, 94.4% specificity, 97.37% PPV, and 53.13% NPV for stroke prediction.ConclusionBlood viscosity shows potential as an adjunctive diagnostic tool for distinguishing stroke from stroke mimics with high specificity, aiding in predicting types of stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":93943,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","volume":" ","pages":"47-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13860291261456431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionStroke is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, and its management differs among ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke mimics. Non-contrast CT has limited sensitivity for early ischemia. This study compared blood and plasma viscosity across different stroke types and identified cutoff values for predicting stroke type.MethodA cross-sectional study at the Emergency Department of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital (March-June 2025). Blood and plasma viscosity were measured using the Neo Digital Microcapillary device then compared using appropriate statistic tests. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSeventy of 97 suspect stroke patients were included (36 ischemic, 16 hemorrhagic, 18 mimics). There were significant differences of blood viscocity between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke compared with stroke mimic (median 5.65 cP ischemic; 5.29 cP hemorrhagic; 4.84 cP mimic; p < 0.0001), whereas no significant difference was observed in plasma viscosity across the groups (p = 0.411). A blood viscosity cutoff of 5.17 cP yielded an AUC of 0.84 (p < 0.0001), 71.2% sensitivity, 94.4% specificity, 97.37% PPV, and 53.13% NPV for stroke prediction.ConclusionBlood viscosity shows potential as an adjunctive diagnostic tool for distinguishing stroke from stroke mimics with high specificity, aiding in predicting types of stroke.

在DR. Cipto Mangunkusumo国立转诊医院预测病理性中风类型(缺血性中风、出血性中风和模拟中风)的血液粘度值。
卒中是发病率和死亡率的主要原因,其管理在缺血性卒中,出血性卒中和卒中模拟中有所不同。非对比CT对早期缺血的敏感性有限。本研究比较了不同中风类型的血液和血浆粘度,并确定了预测中风类型的临界值。方法在Cipto Mangunkusumo国立转诊医院急诊科进行横断面研究(2025年3 - 6月)。采用Neo Digital微毛细管仪测量血液和血浆粘度,然后采用适当的统计检验进行比较。p值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果97例疑似脑卒中患者共70例,其中缺血性脑卒中36例,出血性脑卒中16例,模拟脑卒中18例。与模拟卒中相比,缺血性卒中和出血性卒中患者的血液粘稠度有显著差异(中位数为缺血性卒中5.65 cP;出血性卒中5.29 cP;模拟卒中4.84 cP; p p = 0.411)。血黏度临界值为5.17 cP, AUC为0.84 (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书