Brain Activity Changes Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-Stroke Motor Recovery: A Narrative Review.

IF 1.7
Irin Apiworajirawit, Wanalee Klomjai, Thatchaya Prathum, Oranich Vimolratana
{"title":"Brain Activity Changes Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-Stroke Motor Recovery: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Irin Apiworajirawit, Wanalee Klomjai, Thatchaya Prathum, Oranich Vimolratana","doi":"10.1177/15500594261458855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain activity can be assessed using electroencephalography (EEG) through measures such as power spectral density (PSD), functional connectivity, the brain symmetry index (BSI), and event-related brain responses. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an adjunctive intervention for post-stroke motor rehabilitation using different montages, including ipsilesional anodal, contralesional cathodal, and bilateral M1 stimulation. However, EEG-derived neurophysiological responses associated with motor recovery following tDCS have not been comprehensively reviewed. A PubMed search from 2000 to 2025 identified 12 studies investigating the effects of tDCS on oscillatory activity and 3 studies examining event-related brain responses. Five studies evaluated tDCS alone (without rehabilitation), whereas 10 investigated tDCS combined with rehabilitation. For tDCS alone, ipsilesional anodal stimulation (anode over the ipsilesional M1 and cathode over the contralateral supraorbital area) and bilateral M1 stimulation (anode over the ipsilesional M1 and cathode over the contralesional M1) showed similar trends toward enhancing high-frequency power and functional connectivity, whereas contralesional cathodal stimulation tended to reduce beta band connectivity. For tDCS combined with rehabilitation, PSD findings were inconsistent; however, BSI and event-related desynchronization (ERD) following ipsilesional anodal stimulation consistently showed increased high-frequency activity associated with motor improvement. ERD enhancements were also observed following bilateral M1 stimulation. Overall, heterogeneity in EEG analytical methods likely contributes to inconsistent findings. Nevertheless, current evidence suggests that ipsilesional anodal and bilateral M1 stimulation may upregulate high-frequency activity in individual with stroke. Future systematic studies integrating standardized EEG analyses with clinical outcomes across different tDCS montages are needed to establish EEG-based guidelines for post-stroke motor rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"15500594261458855"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594261458855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain activity can be assessed using electroencephalography (EEG) through measures such as power spectral density (PSD), functional connectivity, the brain symmetry index (BSI), and event-related brain responses. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an adjunctive intervention for post-stroke motor rehabilitation using different montages, including ipsilesional anodal, contralesional cathodal, and bilateral M1 stimulation. However, EEG-derived neurophysiological responses associated with motor recovery following tDCS have not been comprehensively reviewed. A PubMed search from 2000 to 2025 identified 12 studies investigating the effects of tDCS on oscillatory activity and 3 studies examining event-related brain responses. Five studies evaluated tDCS alone (without rehabilitation), whereas 10 investigated tDCS combined with rehabilitation. For tDCS alone, ipsilesional anodal stimulation (anode over the ipsilesional M1 and cathode over the contralateral supraorbital area) and bilateral M1 stimulation (anode over the ipsilesional M1 and cathode over the contralesional M1) showed similar trends toward enhancing high-frequency power and functional connectivity, whereas contralesional cathodal stimulation tended to reduce beta band connectivity. For tDCS combined with rehabilitation, PSD findings were inconsistent; however, BSI and event-related desynchronization (ERD) following ipsilesional anodal stimulation consistently showed increased high-frequency activity associated with motor improvement. ERD enhancements were also observed following bilateral M1 stimulation. Overall, heterogeneity in EEG analytical methods likely contributes to inconsistent findings. Nevertheless, current evidence suggests that ipsilesional anodal and bilateral M1 stimulation may upregulate high-frequency activity in individual with stroke. Future systematic studies integrating standardized EEG analyses with clinical outcomes across different tDCS montages are needed to establish EEG-based guidelines for post-stroke motor rehabilitation.

经颅直流电刺激在脑卒中后运动恢复中引起的脑活动变化:叙述性回顾。
脑活动可以使用脑电图(EEG)通过功率谱密度(PSD)、功能连通性、脑对称指数(BSI)和事件相关脑反应等测量来评估。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是脑卒中后运动康复的辅助干预,使用不同的蒙太奇,包括同侧阳极、对侧阴极和双侧M1刺激。然而,脑电图衍生的神经生理反应与tDCS后运动恢复相关的研究尚未全面回顾。从2000年到2025年,PubMed检索了12项研究,调查了tDCS对振荡活动的影响,3项研究调查了事件相关的大脑反应。5项研究评估单独的tDCS(不进行康复治疗),10项研究评估tDCS联合康复治疗。对于单独的tDCS,同侧阳极刺激(阳极在同侧M1上,阴极在对侧眶上区域)和双侧M1刺激(阳极在同侧M1上,阴极在对侧M1上)显示出类似的增强高频功率和功能连通性的趋势,而对侧阴极刺激倾向于降低β带连通性。对于tDCS联合康复,PSD结果不一致;然而,同侧阳极刺激后的BSI和事件相关去同步(ERD)一致显示与运动改善相关的高频活动增加。双侧M1刺激后也观察到ERD增强。总的来说,脑电图分析方法的异质性可能导致结果不一致。然而,目前的证据表明,同侧淋巴结和双侧M1刺激可能会上调中风患者的高频活动。未来需要将标准化脑电图分析与不同tDCS蒙太奇的临床结果相结合的系统研究,以建立基于脑电图的脑卒中后运动康复指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书