Examining the Impact of Trial Length on Detecting Medication Effects for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Meta-Regression Study

IF 2.7 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Malia A. Belnap, Katie Witkiewitz, Joseph P. Schacht, Raymond F. Anton, Arnie P. Aldridge, Steven J. Nieto, Lara A. Ray
{"title":"Examining the Impact of Trial Length on Detecting Medication Effects for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Meta-Regression Study","authors":"Malia A. Belnap,&nbsp;Katie Witkiewitz,&nbsp;Joseph P. Schacht,&nbsp;Raymond F. Anton,&nbsp;Arnie P. Aldridge,&nbsp;Steven J. Nieto,&nbsp;Lara A. Ray","doi":"10.1111/acer.70306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends a minimum duration of 6 months for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder (AUD). The relationship between trial length and treatment effects is not well understood. The current study conducted meta-regression analyses of RCTs for AUD to examine the association between trial length and observed medication effect sizes in clinical trials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This secondary data analysis utilized data from a systematic literature review that identified 139 pharmacotherapy RCTs for AUD conducted between 1985 and 2023. Meta-regressions were conducted using the <i>metafor</i> package in R to examine whether shorter (&lt; 12 weeks) or longer (&gt; 12 weeks) trials differed in observed medication effect sizes for abstinence- and drinking-based endpoints, relative to 12-week trials, which represented the median trial duration. Publication bias was addressed using a weight-function model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For abstinence-based endpoints, neither shorter (&lt; 12 weeks; <i>β</i> = 0.13, SE = 0.21, <i>p</i> = 0.54) nor longer (&gt; 12 weeks; <i>β</i> = 0.11, SE = 0.11, <i>p</i> = 0.30) trials differed significantly from the 12-week reference group in observed medication effect sizes. Similarly, for drinking-based endpoints, neither shorter (&lt; 12 weeks; <i>β</i> = −0.07, SE = 0.09, <i>p</i> = 0.39) nor longer (&gt; 12 weeks; <i>β</i> = 0.06, SE = 0.05, <i>p</i> = 0.26) trials differed significantly from 12-week trials in observed medication effect sizes. All results remained nonsignificant after adjusting for publication bias. In sensitivity analyses restricted to trials with statistically significant effect sizes, trials &gt; 12 weeks showed smaller estimated treatment effects compared to trials ≤ 12 weeks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Observed medication effect sizes did not differ significantly across trial lengths for abstinence and drinking-based endpoints, except for analyses restricted to trials with significant effect sizes, where there was an advantage for trials that were 12 weeks or shorter. These findings inform efforts to optimize AUD RCT design.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"50 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.70306","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.70306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends a minimum duration of 6 months for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder (AUD). The relationship between trial length and treatment effects is not well understood. The current study conducted meta-regression analyses of RCTs for AUD to examine the association between trial length and observed medication effect sizes in clinical trials.

Methods

This secondary data analysis utilized data from a systematic literature review that identified 139 pharmacotherapy RCTs for AUD conducted between 1985 and 2023. Meta-regressions were conducted using the metafor package in R to examine whether shorter (< 12 weeks) or longer (> 12 weeks) trials differed in observed medication effect sizes for abstinence- and drinking-based endpoints, relative to 12-week trials, which represented the median trial duration. Publication bias was addressed using a weight-function model.

Results

For abstinence-based endpoints, neither shorter (< 12 weeks; β = 0.13, SE = 0.21, p = 0.54) nor longer (> 12 weeks; β = 0.11, SE = 0.11, p = 0.30) trials differed significantly from the 12-week reference group in observed medication effect sizes. Similarly, for drinking-based endpoints, neither shorter (< 12 weeks; β = −0.07, SE = 0.09, p = 0.39) nor longer (> 12 weeks; β = 0.06, SE = 0.05, p = 0.26) trials differed significantly from 12-week trials in observed medication effect sizes. All results remained nonsignificant after adjusting for publication bias. In sensitivity analyses restricted to trials with statistically significant effect sizes, trials > 12 weeks showed smaller estimated treatment effects compared to trials ≤ 12 weeks.

Conclusions

Observed medication effect sizes did not differ significantly across trial lengths for abstinence and drinking-based endpoints, except for analyses restricted to trials with significant effect sizes, where there was an advantage for trials that were 12 weeks or shorter. These findings inform efforts to optimize AUD RCT design.

Abstract Image

检验试验长度对检测酒精使用障碍药物效果的影响:一项meta回归研究
背景:美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)建议评估酒精使用障碍(AUD)药物治疗的随机对照试验(rct)至少持续6个月。试验时间和治疗效果之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究对AUD的随机对照试验进行了meta回归分析,以检验临床试验中试验长度与观察到的药物效应大小之间的关系。方法:本次要数据分析利用了系统文献综述的数据,该文献综述确定了1985年至2023年间进行的139项AUD药物治疗随机对照试验。使用R中的荟萃包进行meta回归,以检查较短(12周)的试验是否在观察到的基于戒断和饮酒的终点的药物效应大小上与代表中位试验持续时间的12周试验不同。采用权重函数模型解决发表偏倚问题。结果:对于基于戒断的终点,较短的试验(12周;β = 0.11, SE = 0.11, p = 0.30)在观察到的药物效应大小方面与12周参照组没有显著差异。同样,对于基于饮酒的终点,较短的试验(12周;β = 0.06, SE = 0.05, p = 0.26)与12周的试验在观察到的药物效应大小上没有显著差异。在校正发表偏倚后,所有结果仍然不显著。在仅限于具有统计学显著效应量的试验的敏感性分析中,与≤12周的试验相比,bb0 - 12周的试验显示出较小的估计治疗效果。结论:观察到的药物效应大小在戒酒和饮酒终点的试验长度之间没有显著差异,除了局限于具有显著效应大小的试验的分析,其中12周或更短的试验有优势。这些发现为优化AUD RCT设计提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书