How to Design and Implement a Structured Curriculum in Health Professions Education: A Nine-Step Framework Building on Kern's Approach

IF 1.7 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1111/tct.70455
Émile Escourrou, Stéphane Oustric
{"title":"How to Design and Implement a Structured Curriculum in Health Professions Education: A Nine-Step Framework Building on Kern's Approach","authors":"Émile Escourrou,&nbsp;Stéphane Oustric","doi":"10.1111/tct.70455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Structured approaches to curriculum development help improve coherence between learning objectives, teaching strategies and assessment in health professions education [<span>1, 2</span>]. Kern's six-step model is widely used to guide curriculum design and implementation [<span>3</span>]. However, implementation, sustainability, faculty engagement and dissemination are not always explicitly addressed in curricular projects [<span>4, 5</span>]. Building on Kern's framework allowed integration of these complementary dimensions while maintaining a familiar structure for educators. This article proposes a practical nine-step framework informed by the medical education literature, including perspectives related to educational scholarship and dissemination [<span>6</span>].</p><p>The integration of theoretical grounding may support greater coherence between learning objectives, educational strategies, implementation planning and evaluation processes. Similarly, explicit consideration of sustainability and dissemination may facilitate longer-term integration of curricular projects within institutional environments and contribute to scholarly dissemination and shared curricular knowledge [<span>17</span>].</p><p>The framework also emphasizes the importance of iterative evaluation and adaptation during implementation. This perspective is consistent with contemporary approaches in implementation science and quality improvement, which highlight the value of continuous feedback and contextual responsiveness in curriculum implementation [<span>18, 19</span>].</p><p>Several limitations should be acknowledged. The framework was informed by a narrative rather than a systematic review and has not yet been formally evaluated across different health professions education contexts. In addition, its transferability across different educational contexts remains hypothetical and requires further empirical exploration.</p><p>Future research should examine the usability, perceived utility and applicability of the framework across diverse curricular and institutional contexts, as well as its potential impact on learner and programme outcomes [<span>20</span>].</p><p>This nine-step framework builds on Kern's model to provide a practical and structured approach to the design, implementation, evaluation and long-term integration of curricular projects in health professions education.</p><p><b>Émile Escourrou:</b> conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, methodology, formal analysis, writing – review and editing, validation, resources. <b>Stéphane Oustric:</b> visualization, supervision.</p><p>The authors have nothing to report.</p><p>Ethical approval was not required for this methodological article, as it does not involve human participants or identifiable data.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70455","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structured approaches to curriculum development help improve coherence between learning objectives, teaching strategies and assessment in health professions education [1, 2]. Kern's six-step model is widely used to guide curriculum design and implementation [3]. However, implementation, sustainability, faculty engagement and dissemination are not always explicitly addressed in curricular projects [4, 5]. Building on Kern's framework allowed integration of these complementary dimensions while maintaining a familiar structure for educators. This article proposes a practical nine-step framework informed by the medical education literature, including perspectives related to educational scholarship and dissemination [6].

The integration of theoretical grounding may support greater coherence between learning objectives, educational strategies, implementation planning and evaluation processes. Similarly, explicit consideration of sustainability and dissemination may facilitate longer-term integration of curricular projects within institutional environments and contribute to scholarly dissemination and shared curricular knowledge [17].

The framework also emphasizes the importance of iterative evaluation and adaptation during implementation. This perspective is consistent with contemporary approaches in implementation science and quality improvement, which highlight the value of continuous feedback and contextual responsiveness in curriculum implementation [18, 19].

Several limitations should be acknowledged. The framework was informed by a narrative rather than a systematic review and has not yet been formally evaluated across different health professions education contexts. In addition, its transferability across different educational contexts remains hypothetical and requires further empirical exploration.

Future research should examine the usability, perceived utility and applicability of the framework across diverse curricular and institutional contexts, as well as its potential impact on learner and programme outcomes [20].

This nine-step framework builds on Kern's model to provide a practical and structured approach to the design, implementation, evaluation and long-term integration of curricular projects in health professions education.

Émile Escourrou: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, methodology, formal analysis, writing – review and editing, validation, resources. Stéphane Oustric: visualization, supervision.

The authors have nothing to report.

Ethical approval was not required for this methodological article, as it does not involve human participants or identifiable data.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Abstract Image

如何在卫生专业教育中设计和实施结构化课程:基于Kern方法的九步框架。
结构化的课程开发方法有助于提高卫生专业教育中学习目标、教学策略和评估之间的一致性[1,2]。Kern的六步模型被广泛用于指导课程设计和实施。然而,实施、可持续性、教师参与和传播并不总是在课程项目中得到明确解决[4,5]。以Kern的框架为基础,可以整合这些互补的维度,同时保持教育工作者熟悉的结构。本文提出了一个实用的九步框架,以医学教育文献为依据,包括与教育学术和传播bbb相关的观点。理论基础的整合可以支持学习目标、教育战略、实施规划和评价过程之间更大的一致性。同样,对可持续性和传播的明确考虑可以促进课程项目在体制环境内的长期整合,并有助于学术传播和共享课程知识。该框架还强调了在实施过程中反复评估和适应的重要性。这一观点与当代实施科学和质量改进的方法是一致的,后者强调了课程实施中持续反馈和情境响应的价值[18,19]。应该承认一些限制。该框架是通过叙述而不是系统审查提供信息的,尚未在不同的卫生专业教育背景下进行正式评估。此外,其在不同教育背景下的可转移性仍然是假设的,需要进一步的实证探索。未来的研究应该检查该框架在不同课程和机构背景下的可用性、感知效用和适用性,以及它对学习者和项目结果的潜在影响[10]。这个九步框架建立在Kern模式的基础上,为卫生专业教育课程项目的设计、实施、评估和长期整合提供了一种实用和结构化的方法。Émile Escourrou:概念化,调查,写作-原稿,方法论,形式分析,写作-审查和编辑,验证,资源。stassaphane Oustric:可视化,监督。作者没有什么可报告的。这篇方法学文章不需要伦理批准,因为它不涉及人类参与者或可识别的数据。作者声明无利益冲突。支持本研究结果的数据可向通讯作者索取。由于隐私或道德限制,这些数据不会公开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书