{"title":"Existential Disruption in Multiple Sclerosis Care: An Integrative Review of Identity and Meaning.","authors":"Lisa Kelly, Chanam Shin","doi":"10.1177/08980101261456436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Multiple sclerosis (MS) disrupts daily life, identity, and anticipated futures. While clinical care has advanced, less attention has been given to how individuals experience changes in meaning, self-concept, and continuity over time. This review synthesizes current evidence on existential disruption in MS and examines how identity and meaning are affected across the disease trajectory. <b>Design:</b> Integrative review. <b>Method:</b> An integrative review was conducted using Whittemore and Knafl's methodology. A systematic search of CINAHL, PubMed, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO identified 25 studies published between 2015 and 2025. <b>Findings: :</b> Existential disruption emerged as a dynamic and recurring process shaped by identity disruption, uncertainty, stigma, and meaning-making across the illness trajectory. These experiences extended beyond diagnosis and were reactivated during disease transitions. Meaning-making processes supported adaptation by maintaining continuity of self rather than resolving disruption. <b>Conclusions:</b> Identity and meaning are central to living with MS yet remain underrecognized in clinical care. This review advances a conceptual understanding of existential disruption as an ongoing process of negotiating self-continuity. Nursing practice may be strengthened by approaches that attend to existential experience as part of holistic, person-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"8980101261456436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101261456436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Multiple sclerosis (MS) disrupts daily life, identity, and anticipated futures. While clinical care has advanced, less attention has been given to how individuals experience changes in meaning, self-concept, and continuity over time. This review synthesizes current evidence on existential disruption in MS and examines how identity and meaning are affected across the disease trajectory. Design: Integrative review. Method: An integrative review was conducted using Whittemore and Knafl's methodology. A systematic search of CINAHL, PubMed, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO identified 25 studies published between 2015 and 2025. Findings: : Existential disruption emerged as a dynamic and recurring process shaped by identity disruption, uncertainty, stigma, and meaning-making across the illness trajectory. These experiences extended beyond diagnosis and were reactivated during disease transitions. Meaning-making processes supported adaptation by maintaining continuity of self rather than resolving disruption. Conclusions: Identity and meaning are central to living with MS yet remain underrecognized in clinical care. This review advances a conceptual understanding of existential disruption as an ongoing process of negotiating self-continuity. Nursing practice may be strengthened by approaches that attend to existential experience as part of holistic, person-centered care.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts are solicited that deal with the processes of knowledge development and application including research, concept analysis and theory development, practical applications of research and theory, clinical case studies and analysis, practice applications in general, educational approaches and evaluation, and aesthetic expressions of holistic knowledge. While the journal seeks to support work grounded in evidence, the editorial philosophy suggests that there are many diverse sources of “evidence” beyond the realm of what is called “empirical” and that many methods are appropriate for discovering evidence and generating knowledge.