Is there a slippery slope? - Data on 22 years of medically indicated terminations of pregnancy from a tertiary obstetric center in Germany.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Emilia Brinkman, Mareike Möllers, Daniela Willy, Kathleen Marie Oberste, Ralf Schmitz, Johannes Steinhard, Moritz Fabian Danzer, Kathrin Oelmeier
{"title":"Is there a slippery slope? - Data on 22 years of medically indicated terminations of pregnancy from a tertiary obstetric center in Germany.","authors":"Emilia Brinkman, Mareike Möllers, Daniela Willy, Kathleen Marie Oberste, Ralf Schmitz, Johannes Steinhard, Moritz Fabian Danzer, Kathrin Oelmeier","doi":"10.1055/a-2875-5116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of changes in legislation regarding termination of pregnancy (TOP) and new diagnostic procedures such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) on timing and diagnoses of medically indicated TOPs at a tertiary obstetric center during a 22-year period.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a tertiary obstetric center between 2002 and 2023. Data on TOP was extracted from the electronic patient files. Cases were divided into subgroups according to legislative changes as well as groups before and after the introduction of NIPT. Descriptive statistics were computed and Mann-Whitney-U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted to compare the non-normally distributed variables among subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1726 cases of TOP were included in this study. Altogether, there was no noticeable change in diagnoses for TOP over the 22-year study period. We observed a noticeable increase in gestational age at the time of TOP which remained, however, below fetal viability. Towards the end of the study period, there was a noticeable increase in TOP requiring feticide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither changes in TOP legislation nor the introduction of NIPT resulted in a steep increase in TOP for certain diagnoses. The increase in gestational age as well as the increasing number of feticides can most likely be attributed to multiple factors beyond changes in legislation and diagnostic procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49400,"journal":{"name":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2875-5116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of changes in legislation regarding termination of pregnancy (TOP) and new diagnostic procedures such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) on timing and diagnoses of medically indicated TOPs at a tertiary obstetric center during a 22-year period.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a tertiary obstetric center between 2002 and 2023. Data on TOP was extracted from the electronic patient files. Cases were divided into subgroups according to legislative changes as well as groups before and after the introduction of NIPT. Descriptive statistics were computed and Mann-Whitney-U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted to compare the non-normally distributed variables among subgroups.

Results: 1726 cases of TOP were included in this study. Altogether, there was no noticeable change in diagnoses for TOP over the 22-year study period. We observed a noticeable increase in gestational age at the time of TOP which remained, however, below fetal viability. Towards the end of the study period, there was a noticeable increase in TOP requiring feticide.

Conclusion: Neither changes in TOP legislation nor the introduction of NIPT resulted in a steep increase in TOP for certain diagnoses. The increase in gestational age as well as the increasing number of feticides can most likely be attributed to multiple factors beyond changes in legislation and diagnostic procedures.

是否存在滑坡效应?-德国某三级产科中心22年来医学指示终止妊娠的数据。
目的:评估一家三级产科中心22年期间关于终止妊娠(TOP)的立法变化和新的诊断程序(如无创产前检查(NIPT))对医学指示性终止妊娠(TOP)的时机和诊断的影响。材料和方法:本回顾性研究于2002年至2023年在一家三级产科中心的妇产科进行。TOP数据提取自患者电子档案。案例根据立法变化分为亚组,以及引入NIPT之前和之后的组。计算描述性统计,并采用Mann-Whitney-U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验比较亚组间非正态分布变量的差异。结果:本研究共纳入1726例TOP病例。总的来说,在22年的研究期间,TOP的诊断没有明显的变化。我们观察到在TOP时胎龄明显增加,但仍低于胎儿生存能力。在研究结束时,需要使用堕胎药的TOP显著增加。结论:无论是TOP立法的改变还是NIPT的引入都没有导致某些诊断的TOP急剧增加。除了立法和诊断程序的变化之外,胎龄的增加以及堕胎数量的增加很可能是由多种因素造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultraschall in Der Medizin
Ultraschall in Der Medizin 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultraschall in der Medizin / European Journal of Ultrasound publishes scientific papers and contributions from a variety of disciplines on the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound with an emphasis on clinical application. Technical papers with a physiological theme as well as the interaction between ultrasound and biological systems might also occasionally be considered for peer review and publication, provided that the translational relevance is high and the link with clinical applications is tight. The editors and the publishers reserve the right to publish selected articles online only. Authors are welcome to submit supplementary video material. Letters and comments are also accepted, promoting a vivid exchange of opinions and scientific discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书