Rachael Taylor PhD, Louise Fangupo PhD, Takiwai Russell-Camp BMVA, Talia Ellison MA, Jillian Haszard PhD, Rose Richards PhD, Stu McDonald PGDipTeach, Barbara Galland PhD, Justine Camp PhD
{"title":"A culturally relevant sleep intervention for New Zealand families with pēpi aged 2 to 12 months: The Moemoeā factorial trial","authors":"Rachael Taylor PhD, Louise Fangupo PhD, Takiwai Russell-Camp BMVA, Talia Ellison MA, Jillian Haszard PhD, Rose Richards PhD, Stu McDonald PGDipTeach, Barbara Galland PhD, Justine Camp PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.sleh.2026.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To identify which indigenous-designed sleep components improve perception of infant sleep and family well-being when delivered online over 6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 3<sup>2</sup> optimization factorial trial was undertaken across New Zealand in caregivers with pēpi (infants) aged 2 to 12 months. Participants were randomized to one of 8 combinations of 3 intervention components (off/on conditions) in a 6-month online intervention: Rongo time (creating calm in the household prior to sleep), Uru time (promoting a smooth transition from wake to sleep), and Whānau support (enabling support from a variety of sources). Outcomes of interest included caregiver perception of infant sleep (3-item Perception of Infant and Toddler Sleep Scale, PoiTSS), caregiver well-being (WHO-5), and connectedness (11-item indigenous questionnaire). Linear regression models assessed main effects of components and interactions using effect coding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 503 randomized infants (6.2 [SD 2.9] months, 50.5% female, 45.7% indigenous Māori, and 38.8% high deprivation), follow-up data were available for 377 (75%) at 6 months. While qualitative data indicated good support for the program, no statistically significant improvements in well-being or connection were observed. Whānau support significantly improved caregiver perception of sleep (mean difference; 95% CI: 0.4; 0.0, 0.7), but not Uru (0.2; −0.2, 0.5) or Rongo (0.3; −0.1, 0.6) time. Both synergistic and antagonistic interactions were observed between components, but these were small.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An indigenous-led intervention produced few improvements in perception of infant sleep or well-being despite considerable support from participants. Further work is required to develop interventions that resonate with indigenous groups and reduce sleep inequities.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (anzctr.org.au, AACTRN12622000921785, 28 June 2022).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48545,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Health","volume":"12 4","pages":"Pages 670-679"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352721826001014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To identify which indigenous-designed sleep components improve perception of infant sleep and family well-being when delivered online over 6 months.
Methods
A 32 optimization factorial trial was undertaken across New Zealand in caregivers with pēpi (infants) aged 2 to 12 months. Participants were randomized to one of 8 combinations of 3 intervention components (off/on conditions) in a 6-month online intervention: Rongo time (creating calm in the household prior to sleep), Uru time (promoting a smooth transition from wake to sleep), and Whānau support (enabling support from a variety of sources). Outcomes of interest included caregiver perception of infant sleep (3-item Perception of Infant and Toddler Sleep Scale, PoiTSS), caregiver well-being (WHO-5), and connectedness (11-item indigenous questionnaire). Linear regression models assessed main effects of components and interactions using effect coding.
Results
Of 503 randomized infants (6.2 [SD 2.9] months, 50.5% female, 45.7% indigenous Māori, and 38.8% high deprivation), follow-up data were available for 377 (75%) at 6 months. While qualitative data indicated good support for the program, no statistically significant improvements in well-being or connection were observed. Whānau support significantly improved caregiver perception of sleep (mean difference; 95% CI: 0.4; 0.0, 0.7), but not Uru (0.2; −0.2, 0.5) or Rongo (0.3; −0.1, 0.6) time. Both synergistic and antagonistic interactions were observed between components, but these were small.
Conclusions
An indigenous-led intervention produced few improvements in perception of infant sleep or well-being despite considerable support from participants. Further work is required to develop interventions that resonate with indigenous groups and reduce sleep inequities.
Clinical trial registration
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (anzctr.org.au, AACTRN12622000921785, 28 June 2022).
期刊介绍:
Sleep Health Journal of the National Sleep Foundation is a multidisciplinary journal that explores sleep''s role in population health and elucidates the social science perspective on sleep and health. Aligned with the National Sleep Foundation''s global authoritative, evidence-based voice for sleep health, the journal serves as the foremost publication for manuscripts that advance the sleep health of all members of society.The scope of the journal extends across diverse sleep-related fields, including anthropology, education, health services research, human development, international health, law, mental health, nursing, nutrition, psychology, public health, public policy, fatigue management, transportation, social work, and sociology. The journal welcomes original research articles, review articles, brief reports, special articles, letters to the editor, editorials, and commentaries.