Rachel Caballero, Sonia Navarro, Jenni Vanos, Floris C Wardenaar
{"title":"No differential effects among cooling strategies on post-exercise core temperature recovery in male athletes.","authors":"Rachel Caballero, Sonia Navarro, Jenni Vanos, Floris C Wardenaar","doi":"10.1080/23328940.2026.2631850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personal cooling strategies are used to lower body core temperature. This controlled cross-over trial evaluates the efficacy of cooling strategies following exercise-induced heat exposure resulting in increased body temperature. Ten healthy active males (25 ± 3 years, 84.5 kg with interquartile range 81.4-89.4) were randomized to a mixed cooling protocol every week within a five-week period. After completing a 60-minute intervention to increase body core temperature, they participated in one of four cooling interventions in thermoneutral (~24°C, ~45% relative humidity) conditions: (1) cool vest (18°C), (2) damp neck towel (24°C) in combination with forearm water immersion (15°C), 3) a combination of all methods, or 4) no intervention. In addition, 500 mL ice-cold water (0°C) was consumed during each cooling intervention (except for no intervention). Time to reach pre-exercise baseline core temperature and physiological responses (gastrointestinal temp-, skin temp- and heart rate) were measured. No significant differences were found between cooling conditions for heart rate (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.15) and body core temperature (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.18). Median cooling rates ranged between 0.02°C/min and 0.04°C/min across the groups with no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.51). Additionally, cooling duration (time to reach pre-exercise core body temperature) was not different between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.38). Skin temperature decrement between the groups was significantly different (<i>p</i> < 0.001), specifically, control vs. combination (<i>p</i> = 0.029). In conclusion, no significant differences in cooling rate were found between mixed cooling interventions, but in all conditions with an average body core temperature ≥38.3°C gastrointestinal temperature decreased to safe levels within 60 minutes after moving to a thermoneutral room.</p>","PeriodicalId":36837,"journal":{"name":"Temperature","volume":"13 2","pages":"200-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13251522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temperature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2026.2631850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Personal cooling strategies are used to lower body core temperature. This controlled cross-over trial evaluates the efficacy of cooling strategies following exercise-induced heat exposure resulting in increased body temperature. Ten healthy active males (25 ± 3 years, 84.5 kg with interquartile range 81.4-89.4) were randomized to a mixed cooling protocol every week within a five-week period. After completing a 60-minute intervention to increase body core temperature, they participated in one of four cooling interventions in thermoneutral (~24°C, ~45% relative humidity) conditions: (1) cool vest (18°C), (2) damp neck towel (24°C) in combination with forearm water immersion (15°C), 3) a combination of all methods, or 4) no intervention. In addition, 500 mL ice-cold water (0°C) was consumed during each cooling intervention (except for no intervention). Time to reach pre-exercise baseline core temperature and physiological responses (gastrointestinal temp-, skin temp- and heart rate) were measured. No significant differences were found between cooling conditions for heart rate (p ≥ 0.15) and body core temperature (p ≥ 0.18). Median cooling rates ranged between 0.02°C/min and 0.04°C/min across the groups with no significant difference (p = 0.51). Additionally, cooling duration (time to reach pre-exercise core body temperature) was not different between the groups (p = 0.38). Skin temperature decrement between the groups was significantly different (p < 0.001), specifically, control vs. combination (p = 0.029). In conclusion, no significant differences in cooling rate were found between mixed cooling interventions, but in all conditions with an average body core temperature ≥38.3°C gastrointestinal temperature decreased to safe levels within 60 minutes after moving to a thermoneutral room.