PROTOCOL: Advancing Agent Networks and Merchant Payments for Financial Inclusion in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): An Evidence and Gap Map.

IF 3.8 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Campbell Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2026-05-06 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1177/18911803261447821
David Sarfo Ameyaw, Sheila Agyemang Oppong, Peter Quartey, Kwadwo Danso-Mensah, Miriam Oppong, Nana Esi Badu-Ansah, Daniel Osarfo, Aisha Adam, Clarice Panyin Nyan, Hannah Afra Darkwah, Isaac Lesta
{"title":"PROTOCOL: Advancing Agent Networks and Merchant Payments for Financial Inclusion in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): An Evidence and Gap Map.","authors":"David Sarfo Ameyaw, Sheila Agyemang Oppong, Peter Quartey, Kwadwo Danso-Mensah, Miriam Oppong, Nana Esi Badu-Ansah, Daniel Osarfo, Aisha Adam, Clarice Panyin Nyan, Hannah Afra Darkwah, Isaac Lesta","doi":"10.1177/18911803261447821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Evidence and Gap Map (EGM) protocol aims to systematically identify, map, and synthesize the existing evidence on supply-side interventions that strengthen agent networks and merchant payment systems for advancing financial inclusion in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Specifically, the EGM will: (1) identify clusters of evidence that present opportunities for further evidence synthesis, including systematic reviews, and (2) highlight critical evidence gaps where additional primary research and evaluations are needed. By organizing evidence across intervention types, outcome domains, and study designs, the EGM will provide a comprehensive and accessible overview of what is known about the development of agent networks and merchant payment ecosystems. The findings will support evidence-informed decision-making by policymakers, regulators, funders, and practitioners seeking to strengthen inclusive and resilient digital financial service delivery systems in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"22 2","pages":"18911803261447821"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13170429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18911803261447821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Evidence and Gap Map (EGM) protocol aims to systematically identify, map, and synthesize the existing evidence on supply-side interventions that strengthen agent networks and merchant payment systems for advancing financial inclusion in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Specifically, the EGM will: (1) identify clusters of evidence that present opportunities for further evidence synthesis, including systematic reviews, and (2) highlight critical evidence gaps where additional primary research and evaluations are needed. By organizing evidence across intervention types, outcome domains, and study designs, the EGM will provide a comprehensive and accessible overview of what is known about the development of agent networks and merchant payment ecosystems. The findings will support evidence-informed decision-making by policymakers, regulators, funders, and practitioners seeking to strengthen inclusive and resilient digital financial service delivery systems in LMICs.

协议:在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)推进代理商网络和商户支付以促进普惠金融:证据和差距图。
本证据和差距图(EGM)协议旨在系统地识别、绘制和综合有关供应方干预措施的现有证据,这些干预措施可加强代理网络和商户支付系统,促进中低收入国家的普惠金融。具体而言,EGM将:(1)确定为进一步证据综合提供机会的证据集群,包括系统评价;(2)强调需要进行额外初步研究和评估的关键证据缺口。通过组织跨干预类型、结果域和研究设计的证据,EGM将提供关于代理网络和商家支付生态系统发展的全面和可访问的概述。研究结果将为政策制定者、监管机构、资助者和从业者寻求加强中低收入国家包容性和弹性数字金融服务提供系统的循证决策提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书