Impact of Railway Delay Announcements on Suicide-Related Associations, Emotions, and Announcement Appreciation.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Felix Bolinski, Stephanie Leone, Lonneke van Leeuwen, Jeroen Bommelé, Bart Hoogcarspel, Anne C Miers
{"title":"Impact of Railway Delay Announcements on Suicide-Related Associations, Emotions, and Announcement Appreciation.","authors":"Felix Bolinski, Stephanie Leone, Lonneke van Leeuwen, Jeroen Bommelé, Bart Hoogcarspel, Anne C Miers","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a001061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Previous research has showed that exposure to a postsuicide railway announcement stating that a delay was due to a collision with a person yielded suicide associations and negative emotions. In 2021, the Dutch Railways implemented a new announcement that simply stated a collision had occurred, but its impact has not yet been tested. <i>Aims:</i> This follow-up study investigates the impact of this new announcement on suicide-related explicit associations, negative and positive emotions, and announcement appreciation. We compare it to the previously used announcement collision with a person, as well as to announcements stating that a delay was due to the presence of emergency services and to a collision with an animal (control announcement). <i>Method:</i> A randomized controlled online experiment was conducted in which participants (<i>N</i> = 346) were exposed to one of eight conditions varying across two factors: announcement and personal relevance of the delay. Participants were recruited from the Dutch railway customer panel. <i>Results:</i> The new announcement stating that a delay was due to a collision was less likely to yield associations with suicide than the collision with a person announcement, but more likely to elicit suicide associations compared to the announcement indicating presence of emergency services. However, the latter was the least appreciated delay announcement. Regarding positive and negative emotions, the new collision announcement did not significantly differ from the other announcements. Personally relevant delays yielded greater suicide associations and stronger negative emotions than nonrelevant delays but more willingness to help other passengers. <i>Limitations:</i> The extent to which the scenarios used in the online experiment reflect real-life situations may be limited. <i>Conclusion:</i> Announcement of collision or emergency services is more appropriate than stating collision with a person in a delay announcement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"252-259"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13543216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research has showed that exposure to a postsuicide railway announcement stating that a delay was due to a collision with a person yielded suicide associations and negative emotions. In 2021, the Dutch Railways implemented a new announcement that simply stated a collision had occurred, but its impact has not yet been tested. Aims: This follow-up study investigates the impact of this new announcement on suicide-related explicit associations, negative and positive emotions, and announcement appreciation. We compare it to the previously used announcement collision with a person, as well as to announcements stating that a delay was due to the presence of emergency services and to a collision with an animal (control announcement). Method: A randomized controlled online experiment was conducted in which participants (N = 346) were exposed to one of eight conditions varying across two factors: announcement and personal relevance of the delay. Participants were recruited from the Dutch railway customer panel. Results: The new announcement stating that a delay was due to a collision was less likely to yield associations with suicide than the collision with a person announcement, but more likely to elicit suicide associations compared to the announcement indicating presence of emergency services. However, the latter was the least appreciated delay announcement. Regarding positive and negative emotions, the new collision announcement did not significantly differ from the other announcements. Personally relevant delays yielded greater suicide associations and stronger negative emotions than nonrelevant delays but more willingness to help other passengers. Limitations: The extent to which the scenarios used in the online experiment reflect real-life situations may be limited. Conclusion: Announcement of collision or emergency services is more appropriate than stating collision with a person in a delay announcement.

铁路延误公告对自杀相关联想、情绪及公告欣赏的影响。
背景:先前的研究表明,在自杀后的铁路公告中,由于与人相撞导致列车延误,会产生自杀联想和负面情绪。2021年,荷兰铁路公司发布了一份新的公告,简单地说发生了碰撞,但其影响尚未经过测试。目的:本研究旨在探讨新公告对自杀相关外显联想、消极情绪和积极情绪以及公告欣赏的影响。我们将其与之前使用的与人碰撞的公告,以及由于紧急服务的存在和与动物碰撞的公告(控制公告)进行比较。方法:进行了一项随机对照在线实验,其中参与者(N = 346)暴露于八个条件中的一个,这些条件在两个因素上有所不同:通知和延迟的个人相关性。参与者是从荷兰铁路客户小组中招募的。结果:新的公告指出延误是由于碰撞比碰撞与人的公告更不可能产生自杀联想,但更有可能引发自杀的公告相比,表明存在紧急服务。然而,后者是最不受欢迎的延期公告。在积极情绪和消极情绪方面,新的碰撞公告与其他公告没有显着差异。与非相关延误相比,个人相关延误产生了更大的自杀关联和更强的负面情绪,但更愿意帮助其他乘客。局限性:在线实验中使用的场景反映现实情况的程度可能是有限的。结论:在延误通知中通报碰撞或紧急服务比通报与人发生碰撞更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书