Discrete subaortic stenosis: prognostic value of the left ventricular outflow tract gradient and implications for earlier surgical intervention.

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
World Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-11 DOI:10.1007/s12519-026-01048-z
Yu-Tong Jiang, Ting-Ting Zhang, Li Zhang, Nan Xu, Bing Zhang, Jia-Qi Zhang, Ke-Ming Yang, Shou-Jun Li, Kun-Jing Pang
{"title":"Discrete subaortic stenosis: prognostic value of the left ventricular outflow tract gradient and implications for earlier surgical intervention.","authors":"Yu-Tong Jiang, Ting-Ting Zhang, Li Zhang, Nan Xu, Bing Zhang, Jia-Qi Zhang, Ke-Ming Yang, Shou-Jun Li, Kun-Jing Pang","doi":"10.1007/s12519-026-01048-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing of surgery for discrete subaortic stenosis (DSS) is controversial due to limited evidence from large-scale trials. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors and reassess current surgical thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 508 patients with DSS, including 375 pediatric patients, who underwent surgery at a single tertiary center between May 2018 and March 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was a composite of DSS-related adverse events, and the secondary endpoint was aortic valve (AV) dysfunction. Multivariable Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to identify predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a mean follow-up period of 3.5 years, 19.2% of pediatric patients experienced the primary endpoint and 13.3% developed AV dysfunction. Left ventricular outflow tract gradients (LVOTG) ≥ 20 mmHg [hazards ratio (HR) = 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-7.8, P < 0.001], ≥ 35 mmHg (HR = 6.1, 95% CI: 3.2-11.6, P < 0.001), and ≥ 50 mmHg (HR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.9-6.4, P < 0.001) were all independently associated with adverse outcomes. Of note, an LVOTG ≥ 35 mmHg provided comparable prognostic accuracy to ≥ 50 mmHg (P = 0.180) but superior risk discrimination compared with 20 mmHg ≤ LVOTG < 35 mmHg (P < 0.001). Additional independent predictors included older age at surgery, moderate or greater aortic regurgitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An LVOTG threshold of ≥ 35 mmHg may offer a more appropriate risk-alert threshold than the current ≥ 50 mmHg standard. Earlier surgical intervention, particularly in patients with AV involvement, may help improve long-term outcomes in DSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23883,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"586-595"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13290889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-026-01048-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing of surgery for discrete subaortic stenosis (DSS) is controversial due to limited evidence from large-scale trials. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors and reassess current surgical thresholds.

Methods: A total of 508 patients with DSS, including 375 pediatric patients, who underwent surgery at a single tertiary center between May 2018 and March 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was a composite of DSS-related adverse events, and the secondary endpoint was aortic valve (AV) dysfunction. Multivariable Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to identify predictors.

Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 3.5 years, 19.2% of pediatric patients experienced the primary endpoint and 13.3% developed AV dysfunction. Left ventricular outflow tract gradients (LVOTG) ≥ 20 mmHg [hazards ratio (HR) = 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-7.8, P < 0.001], ≥ 35 mmHg (HR = 6.1, 95% CI: 3.2-11.6, P < 0.001), and ≥ 50 mmHg (HR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.9-6.4, P < 0.001) were all independently associated with adverse outcomes. Of note, an LVOTG ≥ 35 mmHg provided comparable prognostic accuracy to ≥ 50 mmHg (P = 0.180) but superior risk discrimination compared with 20 mmHg ≤ LVOTG < 35 mmHg (P < 0.001). Additional independent predictors included older age at surgery, moderate or greater aortic regurgitation.

Conclusions: An LVOTG threshold of ≥ 35 mmHg may offer a more appropriate risk-alert threshold than the current ≥ 50 mmHg standard. Earlier surgical intervention, particularly in patients with AV involvement, may help improve long-term outcomes in DSS.

离散性主动脉下狭窄:左心室流出道梯度的预后价值和早期手术干预的意义。
背景:离散性主动脉下狭窄(DSS)的最佳手术时机存在争议,因为来自大规模试验的证据有限。本研究旨在确定预后因素并重新评估当前的手术阈值。方法:回顾性分析2018年5月至2025年3月在单一三级中心接受手术的508例DSS患者,其中包括375例儿科患者。主要终点是dss相关不良事件的综合,次要终点是主动脉瓣(AV)功能障碍。采用多变量Cox回归和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析确定预测因子。结果:在平均3.5年的随访期间,19.2%的儿科患者出现了主要终点,13.3%的患者出现了房室功能障碍。左室流出道梯度(LVOTG)≥20 mmHg[危险比(HR) = 4.0, 95%可信区间(CI): 2.0-7.8, P]结论:LVOTG阈值≥35 mmHg可能比现行标准≥50 mmHg提供更合适的风险预警阈值。早期手术干预,特别是对累及房室的患者,可能有助于改善DSS的长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Pediatrics
World Journal of Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
1.10%
发文量
592
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Pediatrics, a monthly publication, is dedicated to disseminating peer-reviewed original papers, reviews, and special reports focusing on clinical practice and research in pediatrics. We welcome contributions from pediatricians worldwide on new developments across all areas of pediatrics, including pediatric surgery, preventive healthcare, pharmacology, stomatology, and biomedicine. The journal also covers basic sciences and experimental work, serving as a comprehensive academic platform for the international exchange of medical findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书