Hallucinogen-Psychosis Associations Are Confounded by Baseline Psychiatric History.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jacob T Steinle, Suraj Shankar, Joshua S Siegel, Leopoldo J Cabassa, Danielle R Adams, Patricia Cavazos-Rehg, Arpana Agrawal, Ginger E Nicol, Richard Grucza, Kevin Y Xu
{"title":"Hallucinogen-Psychosis Associations Are Confounded by Baseline Psychiatric History.","authors":"Jacob T Steinle, Suraj Shankar, Joshua S Siegel, Leopoldo J Cabassa, Danielle R Adams, Patricia Cavazos-Rehg, Arpana Agrawal, Ginger E Nicol, Richard Grucza, Kevin Y Xu","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m16034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Current drug policy debates often center on whether hallucinogen-related hospital admissions indicate a causal relationship with psychosis. This study examines the extent to which observed associations between hallucinogen use and psychosis are mediated by preexisting psychiatric conditions, providing important evidence for psychedelic policy formulation.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective analysis using MarketScan Medicaid and commercial claims databases from 2015-2019. The population-based sample included individuals receiving substance use disorder treatment with documented substance-related emergency admissions or hospitalizations. We compared psychosis-related admissions occurring 30 days to 6 months postindex event between individuals with hallucinogen-related admissions versus those with nonhallucinogen substance-related admissions. Cox regression models adjusted for demographics and clinical characteristics to determine whether prior psychiatric history explained observed associations.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Among 273,466 individuals with substance-related admissions, psychosis diagnoses were more prevalent following hallucinogen-related admissions (16.4%) compared to nonhallucinogen substance admissions (6.6%, <i>P</i><.001). While unadjusted models showed increased psychosis risk for hallucinogen-related admissions (hazard ratio [HR]=1.22, 95% CI=1.19-1.25), this association became nonsignificant after adjusting for clinical characteristics (HR=0.97, 95% CI=0.95-1.00).</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Apparent associations between hallucinogen use and psychosis appear largely attributable to baseline psychiatric comorbidities rather than direct causal effects. These findings carry implications for evidence-based policy development, suggesting that observed epidemiologic associations may reflect underlying vulnerability factors rather than hallucinogen-induced psychosis. Policymakers should consider these results when interpreting population-level data regarding hallucinogen safety profiles and regulatory frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13296641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m16034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current drug policy debates often center on whether hallucinogen-related hospital admissions indicate a causal relationship with psychosis. This study examines the extent to which observed associations between hallucinogen use and psychosis are mediated by preexisting psychiatric conditions, providing important evidence for psychedelic policy formulation.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using MarketScan Medicaid and commercial claims databases from 2015-2019. The population-based sample included individuals receiving substance use disorder treatment with documented substance-related emergency admissions or hospitalizations. We compared psychosis-related admissions occurring 30 days to 6 months postindex event between individuals with hallucinogen-related admissions versus those with nonhallucinogen substance-related admissions. Cox regression models adjusted for demographics and clinical characteristics to determine whether prior psychiatric history explained observed associations.

Results: Among 273,466 individuals with substance-related admissions, psychosis diagnoses were more prevalent following hallucinogen-related admissions (16.4%) compared to nonhallucinogen substance admissions (6.6%, P<.001). While unadjusted models showed increased psychosis risk for hallucinogen-related admissions (hazard ratio [HR]=1.22, 95% CI=1.19-1.25), this association became nonsignificant after adjusting for clinical characteristics (HR=0.97, 95% CI=0.95-1.00).

Conclusions: Apparent associations between hallucinogen use and psychosis appear largely attributable to baseline psychiatric comorbidities rather than direct causal effects. These findings carry implications for evidence-based policy development, suggesting that observed epidemiologic associations may reflect underlying vulnerability factors rather than hallucinogen-induced psychosis. Policymakers should consider these results when interpreting population-level data regarding hallucinogen safety profiles and regulatory frameworks.

致幻剂与精神病的关联与基线精神病史相混淆。
背景:当前的药物政策争论往往集中在致幻剂相关的住院是否表明与精神病的因果关系。本研究考察了致幻剂使用与精神病之间的关联在多大程度上是由先前存在的精神疾病介导的,为致幻剂政策的制定提供了重要证据。方法:使用2015-2019年MarketScan医疗补助和商业索赔数据库进行回顾性分析。以人群为基础的样本包括接受物质使用障碍治疗的个人,并记录了与物质相关的紧急入院或住院。我们比较了与致幻剂相关的个体与与非致幻剂物质相关的个体在指数事件发生后30天至6个月的精神病相关入院。Cox回归模型调整了人口统计学和临床特征,以确定先前的精神病史是否解释了观察到的关联。结果:在273,466名与药物相关的住院患者中,与非致幻剂相关的住院患者(6.6%)相比,致幻剂相关的住院患者(16.4%)的精神病诊断更为普遍。结论:致幻剂使用与精神病之间的明显关联似乎主要归因于基线精神合共病,而不是直接因果效应。这些发现对基于证据的政策制定具有启示意义,表明观察到的流行病学关联可能反映潜在的脆弱性因素,而不是致幻剂诱发的精神病。决策者在解释有关致幻剂安全概况和监管框架的人口水平数据时应考虑这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书