Stand structural attributes exert stronger and scale-dependent control on forest biomass than tree diversity across typical forest ecosystems in China.
{"title":"Stand structural attributes exert stronger and scale-dependent control on forest biomass than tree diversity across typical forest ecosystems in China.","authors":"Yonghong Zhang, Honglin He, Liang Shi, Josep Peñuelas, Jordi Sardans, Yijing Bai, Chenxi Li, Jiuying Pei","doi":"10.1016/j.pld.2026.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding how biodiversity-ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships scale spatially and temporally remains critical under global change. Here, using continuous monitoring databases across temperate, subtropical and tropical natural forests in China from 2004 to 2020, we quantified multiscale tree diversity-biomass dynamics. Linear mixed-effect and structural equation models were used to further disentangle the direct and indirect pathways through which tree diversity influences forest biomass at different scales. The results revealed significant positive linear relationships between tree species richness and stand biomass at 1200 and 400 m<sup>2</sup> scales (<i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas no significant association was detected at 100 m<sup>2</sup> scale (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Notably, these demonstrated relationships exhibited consistent temporal stability across all spatial scales throughout the study period. Importantly, the direct effect of tree diversity on biomass intensified with increasing spatial scale, while indirect effects mediated through stand structural attributes (CV_DBH and tree density) became proportionally stronger at finer scales. Further analyses showed that stand structural attributes emerged as the strongest predictor of biomass variation across all scales, surpassing both diversity and climate effects. Furthermore, spatial variation of climate factors (mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation) mainly affected stand biomass through the indirect effects on tree species diversity and stand structural attributes. Overall, multiscale analyses revealed stand structural attributes dominates biomass prediction, with climate acting indirectly. Scaling biodiversity-structure strategies can enhance forest resilience under global change. Future work should integrate cross-scale mechanisms into climate-smart afforestation for sustainable carbon sequestration.</p>","PeriodicalId":20224,"journal":{"name":"Plant Diversity","volume":"48 3","pages":"598-607"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13250301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2026.01.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding how biodiversity-ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships scale spatially and temporally remains critical under global change. Here, using continuous monitoring databases across temperate, subtropical and tropical natural forests in China from 2004 to 2020, we quantified multiscale tree diversity-biomass dynamics. Linear mixed-effect and structural equation models were used to further disentangle the direct and indirect pathways through which tree diversity influences forest biomass at different scales. The results revealed significant positive linear relationships between tree species richness and stand biomass at 1200 and 400 m2 scales (P < 0.05), whereas no significant association was detected at 100 m2 scale (P > 0.05). Notably, these demonstrated relationships exhibited consistent temporal stability across all spatial scales throughout the study period. Importantly, the direct effect of tree diversity on biomass intensified with increasing spatial scale, while indirect effects mediated through stand structural attributes (CV_DBH and tree density) became proportionally stronger at finer scales. Further analyses showed that stand structural attributes emerged as the strongest predictor of biomass variation across all scales, surpassing both diversity and climate effects. Furthermore, spatial variation of climate factors (mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation) mainly affected stand biomass through the indirect effects on tree species diversity and stand structural attributes. Overall, multiscale analyses revealed stand structural attributes dominates biomass prediction, with climate acting indirectly. Scaling biodiversity-structure strategies can enhance forest resilience under global change. Future work should integrate cross-scale mechanisms into climate-smart afforestation for sustainable carbon sequestration.
Plant DiversityAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1863
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍:
Plant Diversity (formerly Plant Diversity and Resources) is an international plant science journal that publishes substantial original research and review papers that
advance our understanding of the past and current distribution of plants,
contribute to the development of more phylogenetically accurate taxonomic classifications,
present new findings on or insights into evolutionary processes and mechanisms that are of interest to the community of plant systematic and evolutionary biologists.
While the focus of the journal is on biodiversity, ecology and evolution of East Asian flora, it is not limited to these topics. Applied evolutionary issues, such as climate change and conservation biology, are welcome, especially if they address conceptual problems. Theoretical papers are equally welcome. Preference is given to concise, clearly written papers focusing on precisely framed questions or hypotheses. Papers that are purely descriptive have a low chance of acceptance.
Fields covered by the journal include:
plant systematics and taxonomy-
evolutionary developmental biology-
reproductive biology-
phylo- and biogeography-
evolutionary ecology-
population biology-
conservation biology-
palaeobotany-
molecular evolution-
comparative and evolutionary genomics-
physiology-
biochemistry