Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish PICES in Chronic Pain Patients.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Ayfer Beyaz Coşkun, Gülcan Bahçecioğlu Turan
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish PICES in Chronic Pain Patients.","authors":"Ayfer Beyaz Coşkun, Gülcan Bahçecioğlu Turan","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2026.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Pain-induced Comfort Eating Scale (PICES), which was developed to assess pain-related comfort eating behavior in individuals with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted between June and October 2025 at an internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Elazığ with 161 community-dwelling adults experiencing chronic pain. To ensure a representative sample of stable outpatients, acutely hospitalized inpatients were excluded. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, PICES, Three-factor Eating Questionnaire, and Brief Pain Inventory. The scale's content and language validity were assessed by expert opinion; its construct validity was examined using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Reliability analyses included Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The content validity indices were found to be the item-level content validity index = 0.90-1.00 and the scale-level content validity index = 0.94. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.739, and Bartlett's sphericity test was significant (p < .001). As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, a single-factor structure consisting of three items was confirmed, and factor loadings ranging from 0.850 to 0.970 were determined. The internal consistency of the scale was found to be high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.860; McDonald's omega = 0.902), and the test-retest reliability conducted with 30 participants was determined to be excellent (ICC = 0.924). Positive and significant correlations were found between PICES scores and the pain intensity and pain interference subscales of the Brief Pain Inventory (p < .01). Furthermore, PICES scores showed weak and negative correlations with the cognitive restraint and uncontrolled eating subscales of the TFEQ-18, providing evidence for discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the PICES is a valid and reliable tool for assessing pain-related comfort eating in outpatient clinical settings. Its brevity allows for quick use in research and clinical practice to identify maladaptive eating responses to chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2026.05.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Pain-induced Comfort Eating Scale (PICES), which was developed to assess pain-related comfort eating behavior in individuals with chronic pain.

Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted between June and October 2025 at an internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Elazığ with 161 community-dwelling adults experiencing chronic pain. To ensure a representative sample of stable outpatients, acutely hospitalized inpatients were excluded. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, PICES, Three-factor Eating Questionnaire, and Brief Pain Inventory. The scale's content and language validity were assessed by expert opinion; its construct validity was examined using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Reliability analyses included Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability.

Findings: The content validity indices were found to be the item-level content validity index = 0.90-1.00 and the scale-level content validity index = 0.94. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.739, and Bartlett's sphericity test was significant (p < .001). As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, a single-factor structure consisting of three items was confirmed, and factor loadings ranging from 0.850 to 0.970 were determined. The internal consistency of the scale was found to be high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.860; McDonald's omega = 0.902), and the test-retest reliability conducted with 30 participants was determined to be excellent (ICC = 0.924). Positive and significant correlations were found between PICES scores and the pain intensity and pain interference subscales of the Brief Pain Inventory (p < .01). Furthermore, PICES scores showed weak and negative correlations with the cognitive restraint and uncontrolled eating subscales of the TFEQ-18, providing evidence for discriminant validity.

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the PICES is a valid and reliable tool for assessing pain-related comfort eating in outpatient clinical settings. Its brevity allows for quick use in research and clinical practice to identify maladaptive eating responses to chronic pain.

土耳其PICES对慢性疼痛患者的心理测量评价。
目的:本研究旨在检验土耳其版疼痛诱导舒适饮食量表(PICES)的效度和可靠性,该量表旨在评估慢性疼痛患者与疼痛相关的舒适饮食行为。方法:本横断面研究于2025年6月至10月在Elazığ一所大学医院的内科门诊进行,共有161名患有慢性疼痛的社区居民。为了确保稳定的门诊患者样本具有代表性,我们排除了急性住院患者。使用个人信息表、PICES、三因素饮食问卷和简短疼痛量表收集数据。量表内容和语言效度采用专家意见评估;采用验证性因子分析检验其构念效度。信度分析采用Cronbach’s alpha、McDonald’s omega和类内相关系数(ICC)进行重测信度分析。结果:内容效度指标为项目级内容效度指数= 0.90 ~ 1.00,量表级内容效度指数= 0.94。Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin值为0.739,Bartlett球形检验具有显著性(p < 0.001)。通过验证性因子分析,确定了由3个项目组成的单因素结构,因子负荷范围为0.850 ~ 0.970。量表的内部一致性较高(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.860; McDonald’s omega = 0.902),对30名被试进行的重测信度为优(ICC = 0.924)。PICES评分与短痛量表的疼痛强度和疼痛干扰量表呈显著正相关(p < 0.01)。此外,PICES得分与TFEQ-18的认知约束和不控制进食分量表呈弱负相关,为区分效度提供了证据。结论:土耳其版本的PICES是评估门诊临床环境中与疼痛相关的舒适饮食的有效和可靠的工具。它的简便性允许在研究和临床实践中快速使用,以识别慢性疼痛的不适应饮食反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书