{"title":"Preliminary Insights Into the Combined Antitumor Efficacy of Onco-VV-TT and Natural Killer Cells in Glioblastoma","authors":"Seyedeh Nasim Mirbahari, Davood Sanooghi, Marzieh Ebrahimi, Hamid Mahdizadeh, Ali Davari, Amir-Abbas Hedayati Asl, Sahel Ahmadpour Torkamani, Mahdi Hesaraki, Mehdi Totonchi","doi":"10.1002/cbin.70176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study investigates the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Onco-VV-TT, a genetically engineered oncolytic vaccinia virus, in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), with and without the combination of natural killer (NK) cell immunotherapy. A comprehensive set of in vitro and in vivo experiments was conducted to assess viral cytotoxicity, replication, tumor penetration, and immunomodulatory effects. Onco-VV-TT selectively reduced the viability of GBM cell lines (U251, U87, and C6) in a time- and dose-dependent manner while sparing normal fibroblasts. The virus significantly impaired clonogenicity, migration, and stemness-related gene expression in U251 cells. Confocal imaging confirmed viral replication and deep penetration into 3D spheroids. NK cells demonstrated strong cytotoxicity against U251 cells in both 2D and 3D models. In a xenograft mouse model, intratumoral administration of Onco-VV-TT suppressed tumor growth and significantly prolonged survival; NK cell monotherapy showed limited efficacy, while the addition of NK cells further enhanced therapeutic outcomes. Immunological analyses revealed that combination therapy elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-6) and increased WBC count, reflecting an expected transient systemic inflammatory response to vaccinia virus exposure rather than a direct enhancement of antitumor immunity. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis showed reduced mitosis, increased apoptosis, decreased cancer stem cell marker CD133, and lower VEGF expression in tumors treated with Onco-VV-TT and NK cells. Safety evaluations in immunocompetent mice demonstrated no significant systemic toxicity or organ damage following intravenous injection of Onco-VV-TT. Transient inflammatory marker elevation resolved by day 21, and all hematological and biochemical parameters remained within normal range. These findings suggest that Onco-VV-TT, particularly in combination with NK cell therapy, is a promising and well-tolerated approach for GBM treatment, meriting further preclinical and clinical development.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9806,"journal":{"name":"Cell Biology International","volume":"50 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Biology International","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbin.70176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Onco-VV-TT, a genetically engineered oncolytic vaccinia virus, in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), with and without the combination of natural killer (NK) cell immunotherapy. A comprehensive set of in vitro and in vivo experiments was conducted to assess viral cytotoxicity, replication, tumor penetration, and immunomodulatory effects. Onco-VV-TT selectively reduced the viability of GBM cell lines (U251, U87, and C6) in a time- and dose-dependent manner while sparing normal fibroblasts. The virus significantly impaired clonogenicity, migration, and stemness-related gene expression in U251 cells. Confocal imaging confirmed viral replication and deep penetration into 3D spheroids. NK cells demonstrated strong cytotoxicity against U251 cells in both 2D and 3D models. In a xenograft mouse model, intratumoral administration of Onco-VV-TT suppressed tumor growth and significantly prolonged survival; NK cell monotherapy showed limited efficacy, while the addition of NK cells further enhanced therapeutic outcomes. Immunological analyses revealed that combination therapy elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-6) and increased WBC count, reflecting an expected transient systemic inflammatory response to vaccinia virus exposure rather than a direct enhancement of antitumor immunity. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis showed reduced mitosis, increased apoptosis, decreased cancer stem cell marker CD133, and lower VEGF expression in tumors treated with Onco-VV-TT and NK cells. Safety evaluations in immunocompetent mice demonstrated no significant systemic toxicity or organ damage following intravenous injection of Onco-VV-TT. Transient inflammatory marker elevation resolved by day 21, and all hematological and biochemical parameters remained within normal range. These findings suggest that Onco-VV-TT, particularly in combination with NK cell therapy, is a promising and well-tolerated approach for GBM treatment, meriting further preclinical and clinical development.
期刊介绍:
Each month, the journal publishes easy-to-assimilate, up-to-the minute reports of experimental findings by researchers using a wide range of the latest techniques. Promoting the aims of cell biologists worldwide, papers reporting on structure and function - especially where they relate to the physiology of the whole cell - are strongly encouraged. Molecular biology is welcome, as long as articles report findings that are seen in the wider context of cell biology. In covering all areas of the cell, the journal is both appealing and accessible to a broad audience. Authors whose papers do not appeal to cell biologists in general because their topic is too specialized (e.g. infectious microbes, protozoology) are recommended to send them to more relevant journals. Papers reporting whole animal studies or work more suited to a medical journal, e.g. histopathological studies or clinical immunology, are unlikely to be accepted, unless they are fully focused on some important cellular aspect.
These last remarks extend particularly to papers on cancer. Unless firmly based on some deeper cellular or molecular biological principle, papers that are highly specialized in this field, with limited appeal to cell biologists at large, should be directed towards journals devoted to cancer, there being very many from which to choose.