Collagen Membrane Fixation Technique Affects Its Space Maintenance Capacity After Flap Closure: An Ex Vivo Analysis

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Clinical Oral Implants Research Pub Date : 2026-08-06 Epub Date: 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1111/clr.70146
Muhammad H. A. Saleh, Javier Calatrava, Nataly Zambrana, Lucrezia Parma-Benfenati, Hamoun Sabri, Istvan Urban, Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"Collagen Membrane Fixation Technique Affects Its Space Maintenance Capacity After Flap Closure: An Ex Vivo Analysis","authors":"Muhammad H. A. Saleh,&nbsp;Javier Calatrava,&nbsp;Nataly Zambrana,&nbsp;Lucrezia Parma-Benfenati,&nbsp;Hamoun Sabri,&nbsp;Istvan Urban,&nbsp;Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.1111/clr.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To quantify immediate graft displacement following tension-free flap closure in non-contained alveolar ridge defects regenerated using three membrane fixation strategies in an ex vivo human model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen sites from six fresh cadaveric heads with non-contained defects underwent horizontal guided bone regeneration using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a collagen membrane stabilized by no fixation (NF), periosteal sutures (PS), or titanium fixation pins (FP). Techniques were applied sequentially. Cone-beam CT scans were obtained at baseline, post-grafting, and after passive closure. Linear ridge width was measured at 12 standardized positions, and graft volumes were segmented from STL reconstructions. Mixed-effects multilevel linear regression assessed width changes, while Friedman and paired Wilcoxon tests evaluated volumetric outcomes, with Tukey-adjusted contrasts for intergroup comparisons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fixation pins virtually eliminated graft displacement (−6.7 ± 87 mm<sup>3</sup>) and achieved the highest stability (81.2% ± 8.2%), significantly outperforming periosteal sutures (−96 ± 165 mm<sup>3</sup>; 70.1% ± 4.5%) and no fixation (−247 ± 150 mm<sup>3</sup>; 44.4% ± 17.9%) (loss <i>p</i> = 0.030; stability <i>p</i> = 0.002). Ridge collapse was greatest with no fixation (−1.37 ± 0.85 mm) compared with PS (−0.40 ± 0.62 mm) and FP (−0.28 ± 0.61 mm). After adjustment, PS and FP reduced collapse by 0.96 mm (<i>p</i> = 0.012) and 1.11 mm (<i>p</i> = 0.004), respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Even after passive flap release and tension-free closure, membrane fixation, particularly with titanium pins, provides superior resistance to graft displacement in non-contained defects, while unfixed membranes allow substantial graft loss and are therefore not recommended in non-contained defects.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"37 8","pages":"1020-1032"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13446262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.70146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To quantify immediate graft displacement following tension-free flap closure in non-contained alveolar ridge defects regenerated using three membrane fixation strategies in an ex vivo human model.

Methods

Eighteen sites from six fresh cadaveric heads with non-contained defects underwent horizontal guided bone regeneration using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a collagen membrane stabilized by no fixation (NF), periosteal sutures (PS), or titanium fixation pins (FP). Techniques were applied sequentially. Cone-beam CT scans were obtained at baseline, post-grafting, and after passive closure. Linear ridge width was measured at 12 standardized positions, and graft volumes were segmented from STL reconstructions. Mixed-effects multilevel linear regression assessed width changes, while Friedman and paired Wilcoxon tests evaluated volumetric outcomes, with Tukey-adjusted contrasts for intergroup comparisons.

Results

Fixation pins virtually eliminated graft displacement (−6.7 ± 87 mm3) and achieved the highest stability (81.2% ± 8.2%), significantly outperforming periosteal sutures (−96 ± 165 mm3; 70.1% ± 4.5%) and no fixation (−247 ± 150 mm3; 44.4% ± 17.9%) (loss p = 0.030; stability p = 0.002). Ridge collapse was greatest with no fixation (−1.37 ± 0.85 mm) compared with PS (−0.40 ± 0.62 mm) and FP (−0.28 ± 0.61 mm). After adjustment, PS and FP reduced collapse by 0.96 mm (p = 0.012) and 1.11 mm (p = 0.004), respectively.

Conclusion

Even after passive flap release and tension-free closure, membrane fixation, particularly with titanium pins, provides superior resistance to graft displacement in non-contained defects, while unfixed membranes allow substantial graft loss and are therefore not recommended in non-contained defects.

胶原膜固定技术对皮瓣闭合后空间维持能力的影响:离体分析。
目的:量化在离体人体模型中使用三种膜固定策略再生的非含牙槽嵴缺损的无张力皮瓣关闭后的立即移植物位移。方法:采用脱蛋白牛骨矿物质和无固定(NF)、骨膜缝合线(PS)或钛固定针(FP)稳定的胶原膜,对6例新鲜尸体头部的18个部位进行水平引导骨再生。技术是依次应用的。在基线、移植后和被动闭合后进行锥束CT扫描。在12个标准化位置测量线性脊宽,并从STL重建中分割移植物体积。混合效应多水平线性回归评估宽度变化,而Friedman和配对Wilcoxon检验评估体积结果,使用tukey校正对比进行组间比较。结果:固定针几乎消除了移植物位移(-6.7±87 mm3),达到了最高的稳定性(81.2%±8.2%),明显优于骨膜缝合(-96±165 mm3; 70.1%±4.5%)和无固定(-247±150 mm3; 44.4%±17.9%)(损失p = 0.030;稳定性p = 0.002)。与PS(-0.40±0.62 mm)和FP(-0.28±0.61 mm)相比,无固定时脊塌陷最大(-1.37±0.85 mm)。调整后,PS和FP分别减少了0.96 mm (p = 0.012)和1.11 mm (p = 0.004)。结论:即使在被动皮瓣释放和无张力关闭后,膜固定,特别是钛钉,在非包容性缺陷中提供了更好的抗移植物位移的能力,而不固定的膜会导致大量的移植物损失,因此不推荐用于非包容性缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书