Alternative posology for brolucizumab: a 6-week loading regimen is as effective as a 4-week regimen for the treatment of nAMD.

IF 2.7 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zufar Mulyukov, Ufuk Olgac, Jeffrey D Kearns, Chang Liu, Etienne Pigeolet, Georges Weissgerber
{"title":"Alternative posology for brolucizumab: a 6-week loading regimen is as effective as a 4-week regimen for the treatment of nAMD.","authors":"Zufar Mulyukov, Ufuk Olgac, Jeffrey D Kearns, Chang Liu, Etienne Pigeolet, Georges Weissgerber","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extending the dosing interval with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) brolucizumab in the loading phase may reduce treatment burden while maintaining functional and anatomical outcomes for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We integrated population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and quantitative system pharmacology (QSP) modelling approaches to evaluate the effect of brolucizumab 6 mg on central subfield thickness (CSFT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using an alternative reduced loading regimen (two or three administrations every 6 weeks (q6w)) followed by individualised every 12 weeks/every 8 weeks (q12w/q8w) maintenance. The simulation results were compared with the CSFT and BCVA outcomes in the phase 3 HAWK and HARRIER studies, in which patients received the approved loading regimen of 3 monthly doses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both loading regimens, simulations of the QSP model showed almost complete VEGF inhibition during the loading phase and free VEGF recovery commenced 6‒7 weeks following the last loading dose, returning to baseline levels after 12‒13 weeks.The population PK/PD simulations showed that week 48 and week 36-48 mean BCVA and CSFT changes from baseline using the alternative loading regimen and individualised maintenance treatment were similar to HAWK and HARRIER study measures. Simulated disease activity assessments indicate that only 20% of patients needed third q6w loading dose before switching to q12w/q8w maintenance treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This integrated modelling approach predicted that reducing the loading regimen of brolucizumab 6 mg treatment to two or three doses every 6 weeks is expected to result in similar efficacy outcomes, resulting in regulatory approval of this alternative dosing regimen in several countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13264847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extending the dosing interval with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) brolucizumab in the loading phase may reduce treatment burden while maintaining functional and anatomical outcomes for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Methods: We integrated population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and quantitative system pharmacology (QSP) modelling approaches to evaluate the effect of brolucizumab 6 mg on central subfield thickness (CSFT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using an alternative reduced loading regimen (two or three administrations every 6 weeks (q6w)) followed by individualised every 12 weeks/every 8 weeks (q12w/q8w) maintenance. The simulation results were compared with the CSFT and BCVA outcomes in the phase 3 HAWK and HARRIER studies, in which patients received the approved loading regimen of 3 monthly doses.

Results: For both loading regimens, simulations of the QSP model showed almost complete VEGF inhibition during the loading phase and free VEGF recovery commenced 6‒7 weeks following the last loading dose, returning to baseline levels after 12‒13 weeks.The population PK/PD simulations showed that week 48 and week 36-48 mean BCVA and CSFT changes from baseline using the alternative loading regimen and individualised maintenance treatment were similar to HAWK and HARRIER study measures. Simulated disease activity assessments indicate that only 20% of patients needed third q6w loading dose before switching to q12w/q8w maintenance treatment.

Conclusions: This integrated modelling approach predicted that reducing the loading regimen of brolucizumab 6 mg treatment to two or three doses every 6 weeks is expected to result in similar efficacy outcomes, resulting in regulatory approval of this alternative dosing regimen in several countries.

brolucizumab的替代方案:对于治疗nAMD, 6周的负荷方案与4周方案同样有效。
背景:在负荷阶段延长抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF) brolucizumab的给药间隔可能会减轻治疗负担,同时维持新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的功能和解剖结果。方法:我们整合了群体药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)和定量系统药理学(QSP)建模方法,使用替代的减少负荷方案(每6周(q6w)两次或三次给药)评估brolucizumab 6mg对中心亚场厚度(CSFT)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的影响,然后每12周/每8周(q12w/q8w)进行个体化维持。模拟结果与3期HAWK和rier研究中的CSFT和BCVA结果进行了比较,其中患者接受了批准的3个月剂量的加载方案。结果:对于两种加载方案,QSP模型的模拟显示,在加载阶段VEGF几乎完全抑制,最后一次加载剂量后6-7周开始恢复自由VEGF, 12-13周后恢复到基线水平。人群PK/PD模拟显示,第48周和第36-48周,使用替代负荷方案和个体化维持治疗的平均BCVA和CSFT从基线变化与HAWK和rier研究措施相似。模拟疾病活动评估表明,只有20%的患者在转入q12w/q8w维持治疗前需要第三次q6w负荷剂量。结论:这种综合建模方法预测,将brolucizumab 6mg治疗的负荷方案减少到每6周2次或3次,预计会产生类似的疗效结果,导致该替代给药方案在几个国家获得监管部门的批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书