MRI-based deep learning combined with radiomics for the preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in patients with bladder cancer.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Chang Chen, Zhengye Tan, Lingkai Cai, Haonan Chen, Xiaotong Liu, Bo Liang, Meihua Jiang, Gongcheng Wang, Qiang Shao, Hongliang Que, Xuping Jiang, Yuheng Zhang, Chenghao Wang, Rongjie Bai, Hao Yu, Xiao Yang, Qiang Lu, Yuhao Lin, Qiang Cao
{"title":"MRI-based deep learning combined with radiomics for the preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in patients with bladder cancer.","authors":"Chang Chen, Zhengye Tan, Lingkai Cai, Haonan Chen, Xiaotong Liu, Bo Liang, Meihua Jiang, Gongcheng Wang, Qiang Shao, Hongliang Que, Xuping Jiang, Yuheng Zhang, Chenghao Wang, Rongjie Bai, Hao Yu, Xiao Yang, Qiang Lu, Yuhao Lin, Qiang Cao","doi":"10.1186/s40644-026-01070-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) signifies poor prognosis in bladder cancer, yet reliable preoperative prediction remains challenging, limiting personalized treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-center retrospective study, 543 bladder cancer patients were enrolled. Of these, 473 patients from two centers were randomly split into training and internal test sets at an 8:2 ratio, while 70 patients from six additional centers constituted an independent external test set. After tumor and peritumoral segmentation, a hybrid model that integrates deep learning and radiomics features was developed. The hybrid model was compared against ten baseline models, including image-only and radiomics-only deep learning models, as well as radiomics-based machine learning approaches. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with five-fold cross-validation. Prognostic value was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hybrid model achieved AUCs of 0.77 (internal test) and 0.75 (external test), surpassing all baseline models. The model-predicted LVI status significantly stratified overall survival in the training set (p < 0.001) and the internal test set (p = 0.003), with a non-significant trend observed in the external test set (p = 0.151).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed non-invasive hybrid model can accurately predict LVI status preoperatively and demonstrates prognostic potential, thereby aiding risk stratification in bladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13483486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-026-01070-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) signifies poor prognosis in bladder cancer, yet reliable preoperative prediction remains challenging, limiting personalized treatment planning.

Methods: In this multi-center retrospective study, 543 bladder cancer patients were enrolled. Of these, 473 patients from two centers were randomly split into training and internal test sets at an 8:2 ratio, while 70 patients from six additional centers constituted an independent external test set. After tumor and peritumoral segmentation, a hybrid model that integrates deep learning and radiomics features was developed. The hybrid model was compared against ten baseline models, including image-only and radiomics-only deep learning models, as well as radiomics-based machine learning approaches. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with five-fold cross-validation. Prognostic value was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with the log-rank test.

Results: The hybrid model achieved AUCs of 0.77 (internal test) and 0.75 (external test), surpassing all baseline models. The model-predicted LVI status significantly stratified overall survival in the training set (p < 0.001) and the internal test set (p = 0.003), with a non-significant trend observed in the external test set (p = 0.151).

Conclusion: The proposed non-invasive hybrid model can accurately predict LVI status preoperatively and demonstrates prognostic potential, thereby aiding risk stratification in bladder cancer.

基于mri的深度学习结合放射组学对膀胱癌患者淋巴血管侵袭的术前预测。
背景:淋巴血管侵犯(LVI)预示膀胱癌预后不良,但可靠的术前预测仍然具有挑战性,限制了个性化的治疗计划。方法:采用多中心回顾性研究,纳入543例膀胱癌患者。其中,来自两个中心的473名患者按8:2的比例随机分为训练组和内部测试组,而来自另外六个中心的70名患者组成独立的外部测试组。在对肿瘤和肿瘤周围进行分割后,开发了一个融合了深度学习和放射组学特征的混合模型。混合模型与10个基线模型进行了比较,包括仅图像和仅放射组学的深度学习模型,以及基于放射组学的机器学习方法。采用五重交叉验证的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型性能。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和log-rank检验评估预后价值。结果:混合模型的auc分别为0.77(内测)和0.75(外测),优于所有基线模型。结论:提出的无创混合模型能准确预测术前LVI状态,显示预后潜力,有助于膀胱癌的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书