Predicting postpartum hemorrhage in placenta accreta spectrum patients with prophylactic abdominal aorta balloon occlusion: a retrospective cohort study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2026-06-12 Epub Date: 2026-10-20 DOI:10.1007/s00404-026-08456-6
Ying Zha, Yun Zhao, Min Peng, Huan Zhang, Tingting Jiang, Sheng Zhao, Wenzhong Yang, Yin Xie, E Liao, Hui Xie, Lei Zhao, Wei Ren, Na Zhang, Xiaoying Wei, Jing Bao, Hui Du, Yaping Hu, Wanjiang Zeng, Yuanming Feng, Guoqiang Sun
{"title":"Predicting postpartum hemorrhage in placenta accreta spectrum patients with prophylactic abdominal aorta balloon occlusion: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Ying Zha,&nbsp;Yun Zhao,&nbsp;Min Peng,&nbsp;Huan Zhang,&nbsp;Tingting Jiang,&nbsp;Sheng Zhao,&nbsp;Wenzhong Yang,&nbsp;Yin Xie,&nbsp;E Liao,&nbsp;Hui Xie,&nbsp;Lei Zhao,&nbsp;Wei Ren,&nbsp;Na Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaoying Wei,&nbsp;Jing Bao,&nbsp;Hui Du,&nbsp;Yaping Hu,&nbsp;Wanjiang Zeng,&nbsp;Yuanming Feng,&nbsp;Guoqiang Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00404-026-08456-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prophylactic abdominal aortic balloon occlusion (AABO) is a hemostasis intervention for patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). However, many PAS patients with prophylactic AABO still experience postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for PPH in PAS patients undergoing prophylactic AABO.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study (2018–2024) was conducted at a tertiary hospital. PAS women undergoing prophylactic AABO before cesarean section were enrolled and divided into the PPH group and the non-PPH (NPPH) group. The clinical characteristics, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and delivery outcomes were compared. The LASSO regression and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify risk factors for PPH and to construct a nomogram prediction model.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 126 women were included, of whom 56 experienced PPH (44.4%). Compared to those in the NPPH group, the PPH group had higher gravidity (<i>P</i> = 0.022) and parity (<i>P</i> = 0.002), fewer gestational weeks at cesarean (34.9 vs. 35.6, <i>P</i> = 0.026), higher ultrasound scores (11 vs. 7, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and MRI-based PAS grades (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). By integrating the results of the two regression methods, we constructed the nomogram to predict PPH risk. The ROC curve of the nomogram showed moderate discriminative ability, with an AUC of 0.749 (95% CI: 0.664–0.834).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Prophylactic AABO does not completely prevent the occurrence of PPH. The nomogram intergrating gravidity, parity, ultrasound score and MRI-based PAS grades can assist clinicians in identifying high-risk PAS patients at an early stage, which is beneficial for the preoperative assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"313 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-026-08456-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-026-08456-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prophylactic abdominal aortic balloon occlusion (AABO) is a hemostasis intervention for patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). However, many PAS patients with prophylactic AABO still experience postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for PPH in PAS patients undergoing prophylactic AABO.

Methods

This retrospective study (2018–2024) was conducted at a tertiary hospital. PAS women undergoing prophylactic AABO before cesarean section were enrolled and divided into the PPH group and the non-PPH (NPPH) group. The clinical characteristics, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and delivery outcomes were compared. The LASSO regression and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify risk factors for PPH and to construct a nomogram prediction model.

Results

In total, 126 women were included, of whom 56 experienced PPH (44.4%). Compared to those in the NPPH group, the PPH group had higher gravidity (P = 0.022) and parity (P = 0.002), fewer gestational weeks at cesarean (34.9 vs. 35.6, P = 0.026), higher ultrasound scores (11 vs. 7, P < 0.001) and MRI-based PAS grades (P < 0.001). By integrating the results of the two regression methods, we constructed the nomogram to predict PPH risk. The ROC curve of the nomogram showed moderate discriminative ability, with an AUC of 0.749 (95% CI: 0.664–0.834).

Conclusions

Prophylactic AABO does not completely prevent the occurrence of PPH. The nomogram intergrating gravidity, parity, ultrasound score and MRI-based PAS grades can assist clinicians in identifying high-risk PAS patients at an early stage, which is beneficial for the preoperative assessment.

预防腹主动脉球囊阻断后胎盘增生患者产后出血的预测:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:预防性腹主动脉球囊闭塞(AABO)是一种针对胎盘增生谱(PAS)患者的止血干预措施。然而,许多PAS患者预防性AABO仍然经历产后出血(PPH)。本研究旨在探讨PAS患者行预防性AABO后发生PPH的危险因素。方法:回顾性研究(2018-2024)在某三级医院进行。纳入剖宫产术前行预防性AABO的PAS妇女,分为PPH组和非PPH组(NPPH)。比较两组患者的临床特点、超声和磁共振成像(MRI)检查结果及分娩结局。采用LASSO回归和多变量logistic回归识别PPH的危险因素,并构建nomogram预测模型。结果:共纳入126例妇女,其中56例发生PPH(44.4%)。与NPPH组相比,PPH组妊娠率(P = 0.022)和胎次(P = 0.002)更高,剖宫产妊娠周数更少(34.9 vs. 35.6, P = 0.026),超声评分更高(7 vs. 11, P结论:预防性AABO并不能完全预防PPH的发生。结合胎次、胎次、超声评分和mri PAS分级的nomogram评分图可以帮助临床医生早期识别高危PAS患者,有利于术前评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书