Risk stratification improves outcomes in an osteoporosis fracture liaison service

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Shejil Kumar, Lillias Nairn, Angela Bowman, Sally Dwyer, Ayanthi Wijewardene, Dahlia F. Davidoff, Matti L. Gild, Christian M. Girgis, Lyn March, Roderick J. Clifton-Bligh
{"title":"Risk stratification improves outcomes in an osteoporosis fracture liaison service","authors":"Shejil Kumar,&nbsp;Lillias Nairn,&nbsp;Angela Bowman,&nbsp;Sally Dwyer,&nbsp;Ayanthi Wijewardene,&nbsp;Dahlia F. Davidoff,&nbsp;Matti L. Gild,&nbsp;Christian M. Girgis,&nbsp;Lyn March,&nbsp;Roderick J. Clifton-Bligh","doi":"10.1007/s11657-026-01718-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>\n <i>Summary</i>\n </h3><p>Selecting patients at higher baseline risk of fragility fracture may optimise clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of hospital fracture liaison services (FLS). In this cohort study, we found a risk-stratified approach led to a higher rate of treatment initiation and estimated number of fractures prevented compared to the traditional FLS strategy.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Hospital-based fracture liaison services (FLS) are cost-effective and reduce refracture risk. However, optimal FLS characteristics to maximise clinical and cost-effectiveness are uncertain.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed data for FLS patients at Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney (2015–2023). In 2018, the patient selection strategy was adjusted from a traditional approach (any fragility fracture, ≥ 50 years) to preferentially invite those either ≥ 60 years with any fragility fracture, or any presenting with hip and/or vertebral fractures. Cohorts entering the service pre-(FLS1) and post-this timepoint (FLS2) were compared regarding clinical characteristics, estimated fracture risk and pharmacotherapy initiation. Modelling was performed to estimate fractures averted.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The total cohort (<i>n</i> = 1903) was median 68-years-old and predominantly female (77%). Both cohorts were similar in sex distribution and prevalence of various fracture risk factors. The FLS2 cohort was older (median 69 vs 65 years, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), more frequently presented with hip/vertebral fracture (21.4% vs 13.8%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), had higher Garvan-estimated 10-year fracture-risk (median 36.0% vs 27.4%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and more frequently initiated pharmacotherapy (79.0% vs 64.6%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In the overall cohort, strongest predictors of treatment initiation were older age, osteoporotic bone density, hip/vertebral fracture and female sex. Over 5 years, risk-stratified FLS was estimated to avert more osteoporotic (72 vs 44, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and hip fractures (20 vs 10, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) per 1000 patients compared with traditional FLS.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this large hospital-based FLS study, a risk-stratified selection strategy was associated with more frequent pharmacotherapy initiation and estimated to avert more fractures; however, longitudinal assessment of treatment adherence and refracture rates is required to confirm utility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11657-026-01718-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-026-01718-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary

Selecting patients at higher baseline risk of fragility fracture may optimise clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of hospital fracture liaison services (FLS). In this cohort study, we found a risk-stratified approach led to a higher rate of treatment initiation and estimated number of fractures prevented compared to the traditional FLS strategy.

Purpose

Hospital-based fracture liaison services (FLS) are cost-effective and reduce refracture risk. However, optimal FLS characteristics to maximise clinical and cost-effectiveness are uncertain.

Methods

We reviewed data for FLS patients at Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney (2015–2023). In 2018, the patient selection strategy was adjusted from a traditional approach (any fragility fracture, ≥ 50 years) to preferentially invite those either ≥ 60 years with any fragility fracture, or any presenting with hip and/or vertebral fractures. Cohorts entering the service pre-(FLS1) and post-this timepoint (FLS2) were compared regarding clinical characteristics, estimated fracture risk and pharmacotherapy initiation. Modelling was performed to estimate fractures averted.

Results

The total cohort (n = 1903) was median 68-years-old and predominantly female (77%). Both cohorts were similar in sex distribution and prevalence of various fracture risk factors. The FLS2 cohort was older (median 69 vs 65 years, p < 0.001), more frequently presented with hip/vertebral fracture (21.4% vs 13.8%, p < 0.001), had higher Garvan-estimated 10-year fracture-risk (median 36.0% vs 27.4%, p < 0.001) and more frequently initiated pharmacotherapy (79.0% vs 64.6%, p < 0.001). In the overall cohort, strongest predictors of treatment initiation were older age, osteoporotic bone density, hip/vertebral fracture and female sex. Over 5 years, risk-stratified FLS was estimated to avert more osteoporotic (72 vs 44, p < 0.001) and hip fractures (20 vs 10, p < 0.001) per 1000 patients compared with traditional FLS.

Conclusion

In this large hospital-based FLS study, a risk-stratified selection strategy was associated with more frequent pharmacotherapy initiation and estimated to avert more fractures; however, longitudinal assessment of treatment adherence and refracture rates is required to confirm utility.

风险分层改善骨质疏松骨折联络服务的结果。
选择脆性骨折基线风险较高的患者可以优化临床结果和医院骨折联络服务(FLS)的成本效益。在这项队列研究中,我们发现与传统的FLS策略相比,风险分层方法导致更高的治疗起始率和估计的骨折数量。目的:基于医院的骨折联络服务(FLS)具有成本效益,可降低再骨折风险。然而,最佳的FLS特征以最大化临床和成本效益是不确定的。方法:我们回顾了悉尼皇家北岸医院2015-2023年FLS患者的数据。2018年,患者选择策略从传统方法(任何脆性骨折,≥50岁)调整为优先邀请≥60岁的任何脆性骨折,或任何表现为髋部和/或椎体骨折的患者。对进入服务的队列在该时间点前(FLS1)和后(FLS2)的临床特征、估计骨折风险和药物治疗开始进行比较。通过建模来估计避免的骨折。结果:整个队列(n = 1903)中位年龄为68岁,主要为女性(77%)。两个队列在性别分布和各种骨折危险因素的患病率方面相似。结论:在这项以医院为基础的大型FLS研究中,风险分层选择策略与更频繁的药物治疗开始相关,并估计可避免更多骨折;然而,需要对治疗依从性和再骨折率进行纵向评估以确认其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书