Clinical Utility of Cytological Methylation Assay in Cervical Cancer Screening Across Various Cervical Transformation Zones.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2026-10-15 Epub Date: 2026-06-11 DOI:10.1002/ijc.70591
Xiaoying Zhong, Xitong Jin, Yanan Cheng, Xiaopei Chao, Linghua Kong, Jing Wang, Pei Liu, Yuligh Liou, Demei Xin, Jinghe Lang, Lei Li
{"title":"Clinical Utility of Cytological Methylation Assay in Cervical Cancer Screening Across Various Cervical Transformation Zones.","authors":"Xiaoying Zhong, Xitong Jin, Yanan Cheng, Xiaopei Chao, Linghua Kong, Jing Wang, Pei Liu, Yuligh Liou, Demei Xin, Jinghe Lang, Lei Li","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Type I to III cervical transformation zones (TZ-1 to TZ-3) may have various effects on cervical cancer screening and diagnostic outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of the cytological PAX1/JAM3 methylation (CISCER) assay in cervical cancer screening, especially in TZ-3 women. Between November 2020 and October 2022, 1782 women referred for colposcopy underwent liquid-based cytology (LBC), high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) genotyping, and CISCER testing. After applying inclusion criteria, 1398 women were analyzed, including 1190 with documented TZ classification. Diagnostic performance for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) was compared across TZ subgroups. For CIN3+ detection, CISCER showed sensitivities of 67.4%, 72.0%, 48.3%, and 81.5% and specificities of 91.0%, 94.2%, 91.3%, and 89.8% in all women, TZ-1, TZ-2, and TZ-3, respectively. Compared with LBC ≥ ASC-US, hrHPV positivity, or HPV16/18 positivity, CISCER achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy, with AUC values of 0.792, 0.831, 0.698, and 0.856 across the respective groups. In both the overall cohort and TZ-3 subgroup, CISCER positivity was associated with the highest CIN3+ risk (34.6% and 31.4%) and required the fewest colposcopy referrals per CIN3+ detected (2.9 and 3.2). Combining hrHPV testing with CISCER further improved risk stratification. CISCER demonstrated superior diagnostic performance across TZ types, particularly in TZ-3, enabling improved CIN3+ risk discrimination while substantially reducing unnecessary colposcopy referrals compared with conventional cytology and HPV genotyping.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"2084-2096"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13495850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type I to III cervical transformation zones (TZ-1 to TZ-3) may have various effects on cervical cancer screening and diagnostic outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of the cytological PAX1/JAM3 methylation (CISCER) assay in cervical cancer screening, especially in TZ-3 women. Between November 2020 and October 2022, 1782 women referred for colposcopy underwent liquid-based cytology (LBC), high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) genotyping, and CISCER testing. After applying inclusion criteria, 1398 women were analyzed, including 1190 with documented TZ classification. Diagnostic performance for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) was compared across TZ subgroups. For CIN3+ detection, CISCER showed sensitivities of 67.4%, 72.0%, 48.3%, and 81.5% and specificities of 91.0%, 94.2%, 91.3%, and 89.8% in all women, TZ-1, TZ-2, and TZ-3, respectively. Compared with LBC ≥ ASC-US, hrHPV positivity, or HPV16/18 positivity, CISCER achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy, with AUC values of 0.792, 0.831, 0.698, and 0.856 across the respective groups. In both the overall cohort and TZ-3 subgroup, CISCER positivity was associated with the highest CIN3+ risk (34.6% and 31.4%) and required the fewest colposcopy referrals per CIN3+ detected (2.9 and 3.2). Combining hrHPV testing with CISCER further improved risk stratification. CISCER demonstrated superior diagnostic performance across TZ types, particularly in TZ-3, enabling improved CIN3+ risk discrimination while substantially reducing unnecessary colposcopy referrals compared with conventional cytology and HPV genotyping.

细胞学甲基化检测在不同宫颈转化区宫颈癌筛查中的临床应用
I至III型宫颈转化区(tz1至tz3)可能对宫颈癌筛查和诊断结果有不同的影响。本研究旨在评估细胞学PAX1/JAM3甲基化(CISCER)检测在宫颈癌筛查中的临床应用,特别是在TZ-3女性中。在2020年11月至2022年10月期间,1782名接受阴道镜检查的女性接受了液体细胞学(LBC)、高危人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)基因分型和CISCER检测。应用纳入标准后,对1398名女性进行了分析,其中1190名有文献记载的TZ分类。检测宫颈上皮内瘤变3级或更坏(CIN3+)的诊断性能在TZ亚组之间进行比较。对于CIN3+的检测,CISCER在所有女性、TZ-1、TZ-2和TZ-3中的敏感性分别为67.4%、72.0%、48.3%和81.5%,特异性分别为91.0%、94.2%、91.3%和89.8%。与LBC≥ASC-US、hrHPV阳性或HPV16/18阳性相比,CISCER的诊断准确率最高,各组AUC值分别为0.792、0.831、0.698和0.856。在整个队列和TZ-3亚组中,CISCER阳性与最高的CIN3+风险相关(34.6%和31.4%),并且每检测到CIN3+需要最少的阴道镜转诊(2.9和3.2)。hrHPV检测与cisser结合进一步改善了风险分层。与传统细胞学和HPV基因分型相比,CISCER在所有TZ类型,特别是TZ-3中表现出卓越的诊断性能,能够改善CIN3+风险识别,同时大大减少不必要的阴道镜转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书