Expected Upward Mobility and Fertility Intentions: Evidence from China

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Relations Pub Date : 2026-06-11 Epub Date: 2026-03-26 DOI:10.1111/fare.70175
Chi Zhang, Longxuan Lin, Li Wang, Pengfei Qu
{"title":"Expected Upward Mobility and Fertility Intentions: Evidence from China","authors":"Chi Zhang,&nbsp;Longxuan Lin,&nbsp;Li Wang,&nbsp;Pengfei Qu","doi":"10.1111/fare.70175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study examines how subjective expectations of upward class mobility influence fertility intentions in China and investigates the underlying mechanisms and heterogeneity of this effect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In the context of China's persistently low fertility rates, understanding sociopsychological factors beyond policy is crucial. This study shifts the focus from actual social mobility to the role of subjective mobility expectations—individuals' beliefs about their future socioeconomic status—in shaping fertility decisions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Using 2021 China General Social Survey (CGSS2021) data, an ordered probit model was employed to analyze the relationship. Robustness checks and the Karlson–Holm–Breen method for mediation analysis are conducted. Heterogeneity is examined across regions, residence types, and individual demographics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Upward class mobility expectations significantly increase fertility intentions, particularly for having multiple children. This effect is mediated by enhanced social trust, increased investment behavior, and greater happiness. The impact is stronger in eastern/central regions and among urban residents and is more pronounced for highly educated individuals, males, and those working outside the public sector.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Optimistic expectations of upward mobility are a significant positive predictor of fertility intentions, operating through improved psychosocial and economic outlooks. The effect varies substantially across different societal groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Policy should focus on creating credible pathways for upward mobility, such as strengthening education and lifelong learning, to boost fertility intentions. Support policies should target non–public sector employees, and regional development strategies should aim to reduce disparities in mobility opportunities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"75 3","pages":"1590-1605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.70175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study examines how subjective expectations of upward class mobility influence fertility intentions in China and investigates the underlying mechanisms and heterogeneity of this effect.

Background

In the context of China's persistently low fertility rates, understanding sociopsychological factors beyond policy is crucial. This study shifts the focus from actual social mobility to the role of subjective mobility expectations—individuals' beliefs about their future socioeconomic status—in shaping fertility decisions.

Method

Using 2021 China General Social Survey (CGSS2021) data, an ordered probit model was employed to analyze the relationship. Robustness checks and the Karlson–Holm–Breen method for mediation analysis are conducted. Heterogeneity is examined across regions, residence types, and individual demographics.

Results

Upward class mobility expectations significantly increase fertility intentions, particularly for having multiple children. This effect is mediated by enhanced social trust, increased investment behavior, and greater happiness. The impact is stronger in eastern/central regions and among urban residents and is more pronounced for highly educated individuals, males, and those working outside the public sector.

Conclusions

Optimistic expectations of upward mobility are a significant positive predictor of fertility intentions, operating through improved psychosocial and economic outlooks. The effect varies substantially across different societal groups.

Implications

Policy should focus on creating credible pathways for upward mobility, such as strengthening education and lifelong learning, to boost fertility intentions. Support policies should target non–public sector employees, and regional development strategies should aim to reduce disparities in mobility opportunities.

预期向上流动与生育意愿:来自中国的证据
目的探讨中国社会阶层向上流动的主观预期对生育意愿的影响,并探讨这种影响的潜在机制和异质性。在中国持续低生育率的背景下,理解政策之外的社会心理因素至关重要。这项研究将焦点从实际的社会流动性转移到主观流动性预期的作用——个人对未来社会经济地位的信念——在塑造生育决策方面的作用。方法利用2021年中国综合社会调查(CGSS2021)数据,采用有序概率模型分析两者之间的关系。进行了鲁棒性检验和Karlson-Holm-Breen方法的中介分析。异质性是跨地区、居住类型和个人人口统计进行检验的。结果:对上层阶级流动性的期望显著提高了生育意愿,尤其是生育多个孩子的意愿。这种效应通过社会信任的增强、投资行为的增加和幸福感的增强来中介。这种影响在东部/中部地区和城市居民中更为明显,对受过高等教育的个人、男性和在公共部门以外工作的人的影响更为明显。乐观的向上流动预期是生育意向的显著积极预测因素,通过改善社会心理和经济前景来运作。这种影响在不同的社会群体中差别很大。政策应侧重于创造可信的向上流动途径,例如加强教育和终身学习,以提高生育意愿。支持政策应针对非公共部门雇员,区域发展战略应旨在缩小流动机会方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书