Value Creation or Opportunism? Corporate Political Connection and Social Responsibility

IF 5.3 2区 哲学 Q2 BUSINESS
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility Pub Date : 2026-06-11 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI:10.1111/beer.70004
Canjun Chen, Lelin Lv
{"title":"Value Creation or Opportunism? Corporate Political Connection and Social Responsibility","authors":"Canjun Chen,&nbsp;Lelin Lv","doi":"10.1111/beer.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The reasons underlying the inconsistency in corporate social responsibility (CSR) behaviors have been a topic of ongoing controversy, especially in emerging markets characterized by substantial government intervention, where the issue is further complicated. An empirical examination of private listed companies in China from 2010 to 2019 investigates the factors contributing to the inconsistency in CSR behaviors under political intervention, assessing the impact of political connections on different types of CSR and the moderating role of institutional environments. Additionally, it analyzes the economic consequences of various CSR types under political connections. The findings indicate that: (1) political connections facilitate external CSR while inhibiting internal CSR practices; (2) economic and legal environments play a moderating role in the relationship between political connections and CSR behaviors. Specifically, the financial environment can mitigate both the negative impact of political connections on internal CSR and the positive impact on external CSR. However, the legal environment only reduces the negative effect on internal CSR without influencing the suppression of external CSR; (3) for firms with political connections, external CSR has a negative impact on corporate value, whereas internal CSR contributes to the long-term growth of corporate value. These insights enrich the understanding of CSR behaviors in emerging markets and offer practical guidance for managers and policymakers in crafting CSR strategies that align with institutional contexts.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29886,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","volume":"35 3","pages":"1604-1623"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.70004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reasons underlying the inconsistency in corporate social responsibility (CSR) behaviors have been a topic of ongoing controversy, especially in emerging markets characterized by substantial government intervention, where the issue is further complicated. An empirical examination of private listed companies in China from 2010 to 2019 investigates the factors contributing to the inconsistency in CSR behaviors under political intervention, assessing the impact of political connections on different types of CSR and the moderating role of institutional environments. Additionally, it analyzes the economic consequences of various CSR types under political connections. The findings indicate that: (1) political connections facilitate external CSR while inhibiting internal CSR practices; (2) economic and legal environments play a moderating role in the relationship between political connections and CSR behaviors. Specifically, the financial environment can mitigate both the negative impact of political connections on internal CSR and the positive impact on external CSR. However, the legal environment only reduces the negative effect on internal CSR without influencing the suppression of external CSR; (3) for firms with political connections, external CSR has a negative impact on corporate value, whereas internal CSR contributes to the long-term growth of corporate value. These insights enrich the understanding of CSR behaviors in emerging markets and offer practical guidance for managers and policymakers in crafting CSR strategies that align with institutional contexts.

价值创造还是机会主义?企业政治关系与社会责任
企业社会责任(CSR)行为不一致的原因一直是一个持续争议的话题,特别是在以大量政府干预为特征的新兴市场,问题进一步复杂化。以2010 - 2019年中国民营上市公司为研究对象,探讨了政治干预下企业社会责任行为不一致的影响因素,评估了政治关系对不同类型企业社会责任的影响以及制度环境的调节作用。此外,本文还分析了不同类型企业社会责任在政治关系下的经济后果。研究发现:(1)政治关系促进了企业外部社会责任的实施,抑制了企业内部社会责任的实施;(2)经济和法律环境在政治联系与企业社会责任行为的关系中起调节作用。具体而言,金融环境既可以缓解政治关系对企业内部社会责任的负面影响,也可以缓解政治关系对企业外部社会责任的积极影响。然而,法律环境只会减少对企业内部社会责任的负面影响,而不会影响对外部社会责任的抑制;(3)对于有政治关系的企业,外部企业社会责任对企业价值有负向影响,而内部企业社会责任对企业价值的长期增长有促进作用。这些见解丰富了对新兴市场企业社会责任行为的理解,并为管理者和政策制定者制定符合制度背景的企业社会责任战略提供了实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书