Audit Quality From a Service Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review La qualité de l'audit sous l'angle du service : examen systématique de la littérature

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Accounting Perspectives Pub Date : 2026-06-11 Epub Date: 2025-12-05 DOI:10.1111/1911-3838.70005
Lise Muriel Botha, Phillip de Jager, Francois Toerien, Ezelda Swanepoel
{"title":"Audit Quality From a Service Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review\n La qualité de l'audit sous l'angle du service : examen systématique de la littérature","authors":"Lise Muriel Botha,&nbsp;Phillip de Jager,&nbsp;Francois Toerien,&nbsp;Ezelda Swanepoel","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Audit quality is a multidimensional and latent construct that researchers struggle to evaluate and interpret. This paper follows an interdisciplinary approach by systematically reviewing the literature on audit quality evaluation from a service quality perspective. This service perspective, aligned to stakeholder theory, allows us to consider various stakeholder perspectives. We review the literature through the AUDITQUAL audit quality dimensions to identify areas for further research. These higher-order audit quality dimensions reflect the competence, independence, relationship, and service quality aspects of audit quality. We follow a systematic literature review methodology informed by the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and supported by the Rayyan software tool. Our review shows that the competence, independence, and relationship dimensions usually form the foundation for audit quality research and assumptions. In contrast, only one aspect of client attributes within these dimensions—namely, earnings management—is well developed. Furthermore, the service (functional) quality dimension is shown to have the most potential for future insight into audit quality evaluation. Finally, only a few studies have empirically tested the audit quality construct in a multidimensional sense as most have focused on only one or two dimensions using proxies. Empirical research into audit quality can benefit from taking a service quality view to broaden our understanding and testing thereof.</p>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"25 2","pages":"237-268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3838.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1911-3838.70005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Audit quality is a multidimensional and latent construct that researchers struggle to evaluate and interpret. This paper follows an interdisciplinary approach by systematically reviewing the literature on audit quality evaluation from a service quality perspective. This service perspective, aligned to stakeholder theory, allows us to consider various stakeholder perspectives. We review the literature through the AUDITQUAL audit quality dimensions to identify areas for further research. These higher-order audit quality dimensions reflect the competence, independence, relationship, and service quality aspects of audit quality. We follow a systematic literature review methodology informed by the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and supported by the Rayyan software tool. Our review shows that the competence, independence, and relationship dimensions usually form the foundation for audit quality research and assumptions. In contrast, only one aspect of client attributes within these dimensions—namely, earnings management—is well developed. Furthermore, the service (functional) quality dimension is shown to have the most potential for future insight into audit quality evaluation. Finally, only a few studies have empirically tested the audit quality construct in a multidimensional sense as most have focused on only one or two dimensions using proxies. Empirical research into audit quality can benefit from taking a service quality view to broaden our understanding and testing thereof.

Abstract Image

Audit Quality From a Service Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review从服务角度看审计质量:系统的文献综述
审计质量是一个多维的、潜在的结构,研究人员难以对其进行评价和解释。本文采用跨学科的方法,从服务质量的角度系统地回顾了审计质量评价的文献。这个与涉众理论一致的服务透视图允许我们考虑各种涉众透视图。我们通过AUDITQUAL审计质量维度来回顾文献,以确定进一步研究的领域。这些高阶审计质量维度反映了审计质量的能力、独立性、关系和服务质量方面。我们遵循系统文献综述方法,该方法由2020年系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明提供信息,并由Rayyan软件工具提供支持。我们的审查表明,能力、独立性和关系维度通常构成审计质量研究和假设的基础。相比之下,在这些维度中,只有客户属性的一个方面——即盈余管理——得到了很好的发展。此外,服务(功能)质量维度显示最有可能在未来深入了解审计质量评估。最后,只有少数研究在多维意义上对审计质量结构进行了实证测试,因为大多数研究只关注使用代理的一个或两个维度。对审计质量的实证研究可以从服务质量的观点中受益,以扩大我们对服务质量的理解和检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounting Perspectives
Accounting Perspectives BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Accounting Perspectives provides a forum for peer-reviewed applied research, analysis, synthesis and commentary on issues of interest to academics, practitioners, financial analysts, financial executives, regulators, accounting policy makers and accounting students. Articles are sought from academics and practitioners that address relevant issues in any and all areas of accounting and related fields, including financial accounting and reporting, auditing and other assurance services, management accounting and performance measurement, information systems and related technologies, tax policy and practice, professional ethics, accounting education, and related topics. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书