Pablo González-Domenech, María Domingo-Rubio, Joaquín Camacho-Tapia, Jesús García-Jiménez, Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas, Sara Jiménez Fernández
{"title":"Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation in patients with bipolar disorder.","authors":"Pablo González-Domenech, María Domingo-Rubio, Joaquín Camacho-Tapia, Jesús García-Jiménez, Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas, Sara Jiménez Fernández","doi":"10.20882/adicciones.2438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic mental illness associated with increased premature mortality. Tobacco use is highly prevalent in BD and contributes substantially to physical morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To critically appraise the evidence on pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation in patients with BD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured narrative review was conducted in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, including studies published between January 1985 and March 2025. Original studies evaluating pharmacological smoking cessation treatments in patients diagnosed with BD according to DSM or ICD criteria were included. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were included. Most trials evaluated patients with BD within broader psychiatric cohorts. Varenicline showed higher abstinence rates than placebo, with odds ratios ranging approximately from 3.0 to 8.1 in randomized trials, and was superior to bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in several large studies. Bupropion and NRT were generally more effective than placebo, although results were less consistent. Treatments were generally well tolerated, without increased severe neuropsychiatric adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacological interventions, particularly varenicline, appear effective and generally safe for smoking cessation in BD, especially when combined with behavioral support. Evidence remains heterogeneous, highlighting the need for BD-specific trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":55560,"journal":{"name":"Adicciones","volume":"38 2","pages":"105-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adicciones","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.2438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic mental illness associated with increased premature mortality. Tobacco use is highly prevalent in BD and contributes substantially to physical morbidity.
Objective: To critically appraise the evidence on pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation in patients with BD.
Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, including studies published between January 1985 and March 2025. Original studies evaluating pharmacological smoking cessation treatments in patients diagnosed with BD according to DSM or ICD criteria were included. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed.
Results: Fifteen studies were included. Most trials evaluated patients with BD within broader psychiatric cohorts. Varenicline showed higher abstinence rates than placebo, with odds ratios ranging approximately from 3.0 to 8.1 in randomized trials, and was superior to bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in several large studies. Bupropion and NRT were generally more effective than placebo, although results were less consistent. Treatments were generally well tolerated, without increased severe neuropsychiatric adverse events.
Conclusions: Pharmacological interventions, particularly varenicline, appear effective and generally safe for smoking cessation in BD, especially when combined with behavioral support. Evidence remains heterogeneous, highlighting the need for BD-specific trials.
背景:双相情感障碍(BD)是一种与过早死亡率增加相关的慢性精神疾病。烟草使用在双相障碍中非常普遍,并在很大程度上导致了身体疾病。目的:对bd患者戒烟药物干预的证据进行批判性评价。方法:对PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science进行结构化的综述,包括1985年1月至2025年3月间发表的研究。根据DSM或ICD标准评估双相障碍患者的药物戒烟治疗的原始研究被纳入。由于临床和方法学的异质性,未进行meta分析。结果:纳入15项研究。大多数试验在更广泛的精神病学队列中评估双相障碍患者。Varenicline显示出比安慰剂更高的戒断率,在随机试验中比值比约为3.0到8.1,在几项大型研究中优于安非他酮和尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)。安非他酮和NRT通常比安慰剂更有效,尽管结果不太一致。治疗通常耐受性良好,没有增加严重的神经精神不良事件。结论:药物干预,尤其是伐尼克兰,对于双相障碍患者的戒烟似乎是有效和安全的,特别是当与行为支持相结合时。证据仍然不一致,这突出了对bd特异性试验的需求。
期刊介绍:
Adicciones publica artículos originales sobre el tratamiento, la prevención, estudios básicos y descriptivos en el campo de las adicciones, como son las drogas ilegales, el alcohol, el tabaco o cualquier otra adicción, procedentes de distintas disciplinas (medicina, psicología, investigación básica, investigación social, etc.). Todos los artículos son seleccionados después de pasar un proceso de revisión anónimo hecho por expertos en ese tema.