Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation in patients with bipolar disorder.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Pablo González-Domenech, María Domingo-Rubio, Joaquín Camacho-Tapia, Jesús García-Jiménez, Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas, Sara Jiménez Fernández
{"title":"Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation in patients with bipolar disorder.","authors":"Pablo González-Domenech, María Domingo-Rubio, Joaquín Camacho-Tapia, Jesús García-Jiménez, Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas, Sara Jiménez Fernández","doi":"10.20882/adicciones.2438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic mental illness associated with increased premature mortality. Tobacco use is highly prevalent in BD and contributes substantially to physical morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To critically appraise the evidence on pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation in patients with BD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured narrative review was conducted in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, including studies published between January 1985 and March 2025. Original studies evaluating pharmacological smoking cessation treatments in patients diagnosed with BD according to DSM or ICD criteria were included. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were included. Most trials evaluated patients with BD within broader psychiatric cohorts. Varenicline showed higher abstinence rates than placebo, with odds ratios ranging approximately from 3.0 to 8.1 in randomized trials, and was superior to bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in several large studies. Bupropion and NRT were generally more effective than placebo, although results were less consistent. Treatments were generally well tolerated, without increased severe neuropsychiatric adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacological interventions, particularly varenicline, appear effective and generally safe for smoking cessation in BD, especially when combined with behavioral support. Evidence remains heterogeneous, highlighting the need for BD-specific trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":55560,"journal":{"name":"Adicciones","volume":"38 2","pages":"105-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adicciones","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.2438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic mental illness associated with increased premature mortality. Tobacco use is highly prevalent in BD and contributes substantially to physical morbidity.

Objective: To critically appraise the evidence on pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation in patients with BD.

Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, including studies published between January 1985 and March 2025. Original studies evaluating pharmacological smoking cessation treatments in patients diagnosed with BD according to DSM or ICD criteria were included. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed.

Results: Fifteen studies were included. Most trials evaluated patients with BD within broader psychiatric cohorts. Varenicline showed higher abstinence rates than placebo, with odds ratios ranging approximately from 3.0 to 8.1 in randomized trials, and was superior to bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in several large studies. Bupropion and NRT were generally more effective than placebo, although results were less consistent. Treatments were generally well tolerated, without increased severe neuropsychiatric adverse events.

Conclusions: Pharmacological interventions, particularly varenicline, appear effective and generally safe for smoking cessation in BD, especially when combined with behavioral support. Evidence remains heterogeneous, highlighting the need for BD-specific trials.

双相情感障碍患者戒烟的药物干预。
背景:双相情感障碍(BD)是一种与过早死亡率增加相关的慢性精神疾病。烟草使用在双相障碍中非常普遍,并在很大程度上导致了身体疾病。目的:对bd患者戒烟药物干预的证据进行批判性评价。方法:对PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science进行结构化的综述,包括1985年1月至2025年3月间发表的研究。根据DSM或ICD标准评估双相障碍患者的药物戒烟治疗的原始研究被纳入。由于临床和方法学的异质性,未进行meta分析。结果:纳入15项研究。大多数试验在更广泛的精神病学队列中评估双相障碍患者。Varenicline显示出比安慰剂更高的戒断率,在随机试验中比值比约为3.0到8.1,在几项大型研究中优于安非他酮和尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)。安非他酮和NRT通常比安慰剂更有效,尽管结果不太一致。治疗通常耐受性良好,没有增加严重的神经精神不良事件。结论:药物干预,尤其是伐尼克兰,对于双相障碍患者的戒烟似乎是有效和安全的,特别是当与行为支持相结合时。证据仍然不一致,这突出了对bd特异性试验的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Adicciones
Adicciones SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Adicciones publica artículos originales sobre el tratamiento, la prevención, estudios básicos y descriptivos en el campo de las adicciones, como son las drogas ilegales, el alcohol, el tabaco o cualquier otra adicción, procedentes de distintas disciplinas (medicina, psicología, investigación básica, investigación social, etc.). Todos los artículos son seleccionados después de pasar un proceso de revisión anónimo hecho por expertos en ese tema.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书