Goodness of fit for censored regression in internal dosimetry.

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J Godfrey, D Gregoratto
{"title":"Goodness of fit for censored regression in internal dosimetry.","authors":"J Godfrey, D Gregoratto","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/ae7b43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiation doses from incorporated radionuclides are typically estimated from monitoring data using the maximum-likelihood method followed by a check of the goodness of fit. The likelihood function depends not only on the assumed biokinetic model but also on the information provided by the measurement process. Measurements recorded as below a known censoring threshold (type-I left censoring) are still encountered in internal dosimetry, particularly in historical databases used for epidemiological studies. This paper considers a goodness of fit method for datasets that include censored observations. We focus on censored regression, commonly used in internal dosimetry to estimate intakes from measurements. The method relies on the Tobit likelihood function assuming that both observed and censored data follow a specified probability distribution. We propose the use of the deviance, a generalisation of the familiarχ2quantity, as a measure of discrepancy between measurements and the model predictions. Goodness of fit is then evaluated by comparing the observed deviance to its reference probability distribution. Although this reference distribution does not have generally a closed analytical form it is simple to compute via Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. As a computationally more efficient alternative, we derive analytical approximations for the distribution of the deviance of normally and lognormally distributed data. These approximations are expressed in terms of the gamma distribution, which includes theχ2distribution as a special case. The derived gamma approximations have been validated against MC simulations for several exposure scenarios. While censoring should be avoided when possible, providing a simple method for assessing the goodness of fit should further encourage internal dosimetrists to rely on the censored regression technique rather than using substitution methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ae7b43","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiation doses from incorporated radionuclides are typically estimated from monitoring data using the maximum-likelihood method followed by a check of the goodness of fit. The likelihood function depends not only on the assumed biokinetic model but also on the information provided by the measurement process. Measurements recorded as below a known censoring threshold (type-I left censoring) are still encountered in internal dosimetry, particularly in historical databases used for epidemiological studies. This paper considers a goodness of fit method for datasets that include censored observations. We focus on censored regression, commonly used in internal dosimetry to estimate intakes from measurements. The method relies on the Tobit likelihood function assuming that both observed and censored data follow a specified probability distribution. We propose the use of the deviance, a generalisation of the familiarχ2quantity, as a measure of discrepancy between measurements and the model predictions. Goodness of fit is then evaluated by comparing the observed deviance to its reference probability distribution. Although this reference distribution does not have generally a closed analytical form it is simple to compute via Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. As a computationally more efficient alternative, we derive analytical approximations for the distribution of the deviance of normally and lognormally distributed data. These approximations are expressed in terms of the gamma distribution, which includes theχ2distribution as a special case. The derived gamma approximations have been validated against MC simulations for several exposure scenarios. While censoring should be avoided when possible, providing a simple method for assessing the goodness of fit should further encourage internal dosimetrists to rely on the censored regression technique rather than using substitution methods.

内剂量法截尾回归的拟合优度。
纳入放射性核素的辐射剂量通常是用最大似然法根据监测数据估计的,然后进行拟合优度检查。似然函数不仅取决于假定的生物动力学模型,而且取决于测量过程提供的信息。在内部剂量学中,特别是在用于流行病学研究的历史数据库中,仍然会遇到低于已知审查阈值(i型左审查)的测量记录。本文考虑了包含截尾观测值的数据集的拟合优度方法。我们的重点是删节回归,通常用于内剂量学估计摄入量的测量。该方法依赖于Tobit似然函数,假设观测数据和截尾数据都遵循指定的概率分布。我们建议使用偏差,即熟悉的χ 2量的一般化,作为测量值与模型预测之间差异的度量。然后通过将观察到的偏差与其参考概率分布进行比较来评估拟合优度。虽然这种参考分布通常不具有封闭的解析形式,但通过蒙特卡罗模拟计算它很简单。作为一种计算效率更高的替代方法,我们推导了正态分布和对数正态分布数据的偏差分布的解析近似。这些近似用gamma分布表示,其中包括χ 2分布作为一种特殊情况。推导出的伽马近似值已通过蒙特卡罗模拟对几种暴露情景进行了验证。虽然应尽可能避免审查,但提供一种简单的方法来评估拟合优度,应进一步鼓励内部剂量测定师依赖审查回归技术,而不是使用替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书