The cultural ecology of social media.

IF 2.1 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Evolutionary Human Sciences Pub Date : 2026-05-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ehs.2026.10052
Alberto Acerbi
{"title":"The cultural ecology of social media.","authors":"Alberto Acerbi","doi":"10.1017/ehs.2026.10052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most research on social media considers them as supports for information transmission, explaining online success (and pathologies) by focusing on consumers' biases and interests. This article takes a different perspective, applying ideas from an ecological approach to culture. Success online depends both on the intrinsic appeal of content to receivers and on how well content serves producers' strategic goals within the constraints and affordances of specific platforms. These goals include reputation management, coalition building and identity management, and coordination or participation in shared activities. Transmission is often a by-product of these motivations, and replication fidelity plays a limited role compared with transformations that adapt content to local incentives. Finally, the article suggests that platforms and communities can be understood as distinct niches, each characterised by different audience structures, affordances, metrics, and algorithmic pressures. This perspective reframes persistent debates on social media dynamics, including misinformation, radicalisation and polarisation, and the reasons behind online success.</p>","PeriodicalId":36414,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","volume":"8 ","pages":"e24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13247908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2026.10052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most research on social media considers them as supports for information transmission, explaining online success (and pathologies) by focusing on consumers' biases and interests. This article takes a different perspective, applying ideas from an ecological approach to culture. Success online depends both on the intrinsic appeal of content to receivers and on how well content serves producers' strategic goals within the constraints and affordances of specific platforms. These goals include reputation management, coalition building and identity management, and coordination or participation in shared activities. Transmission is often a by-product of these motivations, and replication fidelity plays a limited role compared with transformations that adapt content to local incentives. Finally, the article suggests that platforms and communities can be understood as distinct niches, each characterised by different audience structures, affordances, metrics, and algorithmic pressures. This perspective reframes persistent debates on social media dynamics, including misinformation, radicalisation and polarisation, and the reasons behind online success.

社交媒体的文化生态。
大多数关于社交媒体的研究将其视为信息传播的支持,通过关注消费者的偏见和兴趣来解释在线成功(和病态)。这篇文章从不同的角度出发,将生态学的观点应用于文化。在线上的成功既取决于内容对受众的内在吸引力,也取决于内容在特定平台的约束和支持下如何为生产者的战略目标服务。这些目标包括声誉管理、联盟建设和身份管理,以及协调或参与共享活动。传播通常是这些动机的副产品,与使内容适应当地动机的转变相比,复制保真度发挥的作用有限。最后,本文认为平台和社区可以被理解为不同的利基市场,每个市场都有不同的用户结构、功能、参数和算法压力。这一观点重新定义了关于社交媒体动态的持续争论,包括错误信息、激进化和两极分化,以及网络成功背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolutionary Human Sciences
Evolutionary Human Sciences Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书