Assessment of TIMP1, Transgelin-2, and Procalcitonin as Protein Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Bloodstream Infection in a Critically Ill Cohort.

IF 2.3 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Sajal Tiwary, Caroline A O'Neil, Sydney Lawless, Olivia Arter, Meghan Brown, Brittany Roemmich, Carleigh Samuels, Jennie H Kwon, Christopher W Farnsworth
{"title":"Assessment of TIMP1, Transgelin-2, and Procalcitonin as Protein Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Bloodstream Infection in a Critically Ill Cohort.","authors":"Sajal Tiwary, Caroline A O'Neil, Sydney Lawless, Olivia Arter, Meghan Brown, Brittany Roemmich, Carleigh Samuels, Jennie H Kwon, Christopher W Farnsworth","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfag084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. Rapid diagnosis of BSI is critical for timely and appropriate clinical management, but current diagnostic strategies have a prolonged turnaround time or only identify select pathogens with minimal prognostic information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined serial serologic samples from 77 intensive care unit (ICU) patients at time points before, during, and after diagnosis of presumptive BSI to identify host-derived protein biomarkers associated with specific organisms and with clinical outcomes in BSI. ICU patients with and without BSI were included. Two candidate biomarkers, tissue metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) and transgelin-2 (transgelin), were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis and with procalcitonin (PCT) as a positive control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TIMP-1 was higher in those with gram-negative BSI [median = 746 ng/mL, interquartile range (IQR): 355-1410] than gram-positive BSI (662 ng/mL, 396-1111), and culture negative (377 ng/mL, 189-708). For transgelin, those with gram-negative BSI were highest (14.6 ng/mL, 9.6-22.0), followed by gram-positive BSI (9 ng/mL, 6.1-16), and negative cultures (9.1 ng/mL, 5.6-13.0). PCT was highest among patients with gram-positive BSI (10.8 ng/mL, 1.3-23.3), followed by gram-negative BSI (7.7 ng/mL, 1.6-57.7), and negative cultures (1.2 ng/mL, 0.3-3.5). The multiplicative product of all 3 markers had an AUC of 0.8 (0.7-0.9). No biomarker was associated with risk for ICU admission, 30-day mortality, or length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TIMP1 and transgelin-2 are candidate biomarkers for diagnosing BSI. Larger studies comparing their utility to PCT and other sepsis biomarkers are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1064-1077"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfag084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. Rapid diagnosis of BSI is critical for timely and appropriate clinical management, but current diagnostic strategies have a prolonged turnaround time or only identify select pathogens with minimal prognostic information.

Methods: We examined serial serologic samples from 77 intensive care unit (ICU) patients at time points before, during, and after diagnosis of presumptive BSI to identify host-derived protein biomarkers associated with specific organisms and with clinical outcomes in BSI. ICU patients with and without BSI were included. Two candidate biomarkers, tissue metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) and transgelin-2 (transgelin), were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis and with procalcitonin (PCT) as a positive control.

Results: TIMP-1 was higher in those with gram-negative BSI [median = 746 ng/mL, interquartile range (IQR): 355-1410] than gram-positive BSI (662 ng/mL, 396-1111), and culture negative (377 ng/mL, 189-708). For transgelin, those with gram-negative BSI were highest (14.6 ng/mL, 9.6-22.0), followed by gram-positive BSI (9 ng/mL, 6.1-16), and negative cultures (9.1 ng/mL, 5.6-13.0). PCT was highest among patients with gram-positive BSI (10.8 ng/mL, 1.3-23.3), followed by gram-negative BSI (7.7 ng/mL, 1.6-57.7), and negative cultures (1.2 ng/mL, 0.3-3.5). The multiplicative product of all 3 markers had an AUC of 0.8 (0.7-0.9). No biomarker was associated with risk for ICU admission, 30-day mortality, or length of stay.

Conclusion: TIMP1 and transgelin-2 are candidate biomarkers for diagnosing BSI. Larger studies comparing their utility to PCT and other sepsis biomarkers are warranted.

TIMP1、Transgelin-2和降钙素原作为危重患者血流感染诊断和预后的蛋白生物标志物的评估
背景:血流感染(BSI)是住院患者发病率和死亡率的重要因素。快速诊断BSI对于及时和适当的临床管理至关重要,但目前的诊断策略有较长的周转时间,或者只能识别具有最小预后信息的选定病原体。方法:我们在疑似BSI诊断之前、期间和之后的时间点检测了77名重症监护病房(ICU)患者的系列血清学样本,以确定与特定生物体和BSI临床结果相关的宿主来源蛋白生物标志物。包括合并和不合并BSI的ICU患者。以降钙素原(PCT)为阳性对照,采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)分析组织金属蛋白酶1 (TIMP-1)和转gelin-2 (transgelin)两种候选生物标志物。结果:革兰氏阴性BSI组(中位数= 746 ng/mL,四分位间距(IQR): 355-1410)的TIMP-1高于革兰氏阳性BSI组(662 ng/mL, 396-1111)和培养阴性组(377 ng/mL, 189-708)。对于transgelin,革兰氏阴性BSI最高(14.6 ng/mL, 9.6-22.0),其次是革兰氏阳性BSI (9 ng/mL, 6.1-16)和阴性培养(9.1 ng/mL, 5.6-13.0)。革兰氏阳性BSI患者的PCT最高(10.8 ng/mL, 1.3-23.3),其次是革兰氏阴性BSI (7.7 ng/mL, 1.6-57.7)和阴性培养(1.2 ng/mL, 0.3-3.5)。3个标记的乘积AUC为0.8(0.7 ~ 0.9)。没有生物标志物与ICU入院风险、30天死亡率或住院时间相关。结论:TIMP1和transgelin-2是诊断BSI的候选生物标志物。将其与PCT和其他脓毒症生物标志物进行比较的大型研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书