Adnaan Ghanchi, Anita Patel, Helena Painter, Isla Kuhn, Anna Gkiouleka, Ian Holdroyd, Danielle Lamb, John Ford
{"title":"Improving case-finding of long-term health problems in disadvantaged communities: A Policy-focused Evidence Brief.","authors":"Adnaan Ghanchi, Anita Patel, Helena Painter, Isla Kuhn, Anna Gkiouleka, Ian Holdroyd, Danielle Lamb, John Ford","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2026.100769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Current challenges: </strong>Case finding, which actively identifies undiagnosed conditions, is key to tackling the growing chronic disease burden, especially in disadvantaged groups. Diseases like type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease already cause millions of preventable deaths, with numbers rising due to aging populations, urbanization, and widening inequalities. The poorest communities bear the heaviest load, with higher disease rates and lower diagnosis. Traditional healthcare models, which wait for patients to seek care, leave millions undiagnosed and untreated. Proactive case finding is a proven way to reduce disparities, improve outcomes, and ease the strain on healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Key evidence to inform policy: </strong>This review identified two main approaches: targeted searches of primary care electronic health records (EHRs) to identify and engage high-risk individuals, and opportunistic screening in community, workplace, and emergency department settings. Systematic reviews and smaller observational studies, predominantly from high-income healthcare systems, support community-based health checks in trusted venues, workplace hypertension screening, and follow-up of elevated blood pressure readings in emergency departments, though evidence for these approaches is more limited. A stepped-wedge RCT found that targeted outreach nearly doubled diagnosis and treatment rates for cardiovascular risk factors compared with opportunistic case-finding (19.7% vs 10.8%). Meta-analyses of over 480,000 women found that self-sampling approximately doubled cervical screening uptake, with uptake increasing threefold when combined with community health worker support among under-screened ethnic minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged women. A cluster-randomised trial of over 74,000 participants showed that active case-finding using symptom questionnaires and handheld flowmeters identified four times more undiagnosed COPD than opportunistic screening, and was cost-effective at £16,596 per QALY gained.</p><p><strong>Further considerations and implications: </strong>This review identifies targeted case-finding in underserved communities as an evidence-based, high-impact strategy for early detection of chronic disease, provided it is integrated with sufficient downstream diagnostic and treatment capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"11 ","pages":"100769"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13247691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2026.100769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Current challenges: Case finding, which actively identifies undiagnosed conditions, is key to tackling the growing chronic disease burden, especially in disadvantaged groups. Diseases like type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease already cause millions of preventable deaths, with numbers rising due to aging populations, urbanization, and widening inequalities. The poorest communities bear the heaviest load, with higher disease rates and lower diagnosis. Traditional healthcare models, which wait for patients to seek care, leave millions undiagnosed and untreated. Proactive case finding is a proven way to reduce disparities, improve outcomes, and ease the strain on healthcare systems.
Key evidence to inform policy: This review identified two main approaches: targeted searches of primary care electronic health records (EHRs) to identify and engage high-risk individuals, and opportunistic screening in community, workplace, and emergency department settings. Systematic reviews and smaller observational studies, predominantly from high-income healthcare systems, support community-based health checks in trusted venues, workplace hypertension screening, and follow-up of elevated blood pressure readings in emergency departments, though evidence for these approaches is more limited. A stepped-wedge RCT found that targeted outreach nearly doubled diagnosis and treatment rates for cardiovascular risk factors compared with opportunistic case-finding (19.7% vs 10.8%). Meta-analyses of over 480,000 women found that self-sampling approximately doubled cervical screening uptake, with uptake increasing threefold when combined with community health worker support among under-screened ethnic minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged women. A cluster-randomised trial of over 74,000 participants showed that active case-finding using symptom questionnaires and handheld flowmeters identified four times more undiagnosed COPD than opportunistic screening, and was cost-effective at £16,596 per QALY gained.
Further considerations and implications: This review identifies targeted case-finding in underserved communities as an evidence-based, high-impact strategy for early detection of chronic disease, provided it is integrated with sufficient downstream diagnostic and treatment capacity.
当前的挑战:病例发现,积极识别未确诊的病症,是解决日益增长的慢性病负担的关键,特别是在弱势群体中。2型糖尿病、心血管疾病和慢性阻塞性肺病等疾病已经造成数百万人死亡,而由于人口老龄化、城市化和不平等加剧,死亡人数还在上升。最贫穷的社区负担最重,发病率较高,诊断率较低。传统的医疗模式等待患者寻求治疗,导致数百万人未得到诊断和治疗。主动发现病例是一种行之有效的方法,可以减少差异、改善结果并缓解医疗保健系统的压力。为政策提供信息的关键证据:本综述确定了两种主要方法:有针对性地搜索初级保健电子健康记录(EHRs),以识别和参与高风险个体,以及在社区、工作场所和急诊科环境中进行机会性筛查。主要来自高收入医疗保健系统的系统评价和较小的观察性研究支持在可信场所进行社区健康检查,工作场所高血压筛查以及在急诊科随访血压升高读数,尽管这些方法的证据更为有限。一项阶梯形随机对照试验发现,与机会病例发现相比,有针对性的外展对心血管危险因素的诊断率和治愈率几乎翻了一番(19.7% vs 10.8%)。对48万多名妇女进行的荟萃分析发现,自我抽样接受子宫颈筛查的人数大约增加了一倍,如果结合社区卫生工作者对未接受筛查的少数民族和社会经济上处于不利地位的妇女的支持,接受子宫颈筛查的人数增加了三倍。一项超过74,000名参与者的集群随机试验表明,使用症状问卷和手持式流量计进行主动病例发现,未确诊COPD的确诊率是机会性筛查的四倍,并且成本效益为每QALY获得16,596英镑。进一步考虑和影响:本综述确定,在服务不足的社区进行有针对性的病例发现是一种循证、高影响力的慢性病早期发现战略,前提是它与足够的下游诊断和治疗能力相结合。