Local treatment of the primary tumor in mHSPC in the ARPI era: incremental value or overtreatment?

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Simone Rota, Melanie Claps, Eleonora Gusmaroli, Amedeo Nuzzo, Alessandro Rametta, Marco Stellato, Elena Verzoni, Giuseppe Procopio, Valentina Guadalupi
{"title":"Local treatment of the primary tumor in mHSPC in the ARPI era: incremental value or overtreatment?","authors":"Simone Rota, Melanie Claps, Eleonora Gusmaroli, Amedeo Nuzzo, Alessandro Rametta, Marco Stellato, Elena Verzoni, Giuseppe Procopio, Valentina Guadalupi","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2026.2688296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The treatment landscape of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has changed substantially with the introduction of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), which have improved survival outcomes and raised the threshold for demonstrating additional benefit from local interventions. In this setting, the role of local treatment of the primary tumor remains clinically relevant but requires reassessment, taking into account modern systemic intensification.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This expert opinion discusses the current role of local treatment of the primary tumor in mHSPC patients eligible for ARPIs therapy, focusing on prostate radiotherapy and surgery. It examines the evidence supporting radiotherapy in the androgen deprivation therapy era, the uncertainties emerging in the ARPI era, the implications for toxicity and local symptom control, and the rationale for ongoing trials evaluating local treatment in combination with contemporary systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>In the ARPI era, local treatment should be considered within an individualized, multidisciplinary framework rather than as an automatic standard for patients with mHSPC. Its main value may increasingly lie in preventing local progression and genitourinary complications in selected patients, while a definitive overall survival benefit on top of intensified systemic therapy remains unproven.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2026.2688296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The treatment landscape of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has changed substantially with the introduction of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), which have improved survival outcomes and raised the threshold for demonstrating additional benefit from local interventions. In this setting, the role of local treatment of the primary tumor remains clinically relevant but requires reassessment, taking into account modern systemic intensification.

Areas covered: This expert opinion discusses the current role of local treatment of the primary tumor in mHSPC patients eligible for ARPIs therapy, focusing on prostate radiotherapy and surgery. It examines the evidence supporting radiotherapy in the androgen deprivation therapy era, the uncertainties emerging in the ARPI era, the implications for toxicity and local symptom control, and the rationale for ongoing trials evaluating local treatment in combination with contemporary systemic therapy.

Expert opinion: In the ARPI era, local treatment should be considered within an individualized, multidisciplinary framework rather than as an automatic standard for patients with mHSPC. Its main value may increasingly lie in preventing local progression and genitourinary complications in selected patients, while a definitive overall survival benefit on top of intensified systemic therapy remains unproven.

ARPI时代mHSPC原发肿瘤的局部治疗:增量价值还是过度治疗?
随着雄激素受体途径抑制剂(arpi)的引入,转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)的治疗前景发生了实质性变化,它改善了生存结果,提高了证明局部干预带来额外益处的门槛。在这种情况下,原发肿瘤局部治疗的作用仍然具有临床相关性,但需要重新评估,考虑到现代全身强化。涵盖领域:本专家意见讨论了目前适合arpi治疗的mHSPC患者原发肿瘤局部治疗的作用,重点是前列腺放疗和手术。它研究了在雄激素剥夺治疗时代支持放射治疗的证据,ARPI时代出现的不确定性,对毒性和局部症状控制的影响,以及正在进行的评估局部治疗与现代全身治疗相结合的试验的基本原理。专家意见:在ARPI时代,局部治疗应在个体化、多学科框架内考虑,而不是作为mHSPC患者的自动标准。它的主要价值可能越来越多地在于预防局部进展和特定患者的泌尿生殖系统并发症,而强化全身治疗的最终总体生存获益仍未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书