Simone Rota, Melanie Claps, Eleonora Gusmaroli, Amedeo Nuzzo, Alessandro Rametta, Marco Stellato, Elena Verzoni, Giuseppe Procopio, Valentina Guadalupi
{"title":"Local treatment of the primary tumor in mHSPC in the ARPI era: incremental value or overtreatment?","authors":"Simone Rota, Melanie Claps, Eleonora Gusmaroli, Amedeo Nuzzo, Alessandro Rametta, Marco Stellato, Elena Verzoni, Giuseppe Procopio, Valentina Guadalupi","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2026.2688296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The treatment landscape of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has changed substantially with the introduction of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), which have improved survival outcomes and raised the threshold for demonstrating additional benefit from local interventions. In this setting, the role of local treatment of the primary tumor remains clinically relevant but requires reassessment, taking into account modern systemic intensification.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This expert opinion discusses the current role of local treatment of the primary tumor in mHSPC patients eligible for ARPIs therapy, focusing on prostate radiotherapy and surgery. It examines the evidence supporting radiotherapy in the androgen deprivation therapy era, the uncertainties emerging in the ARPI era, the implications for toxicity and local symptom control, and the rationale for ongoing trials evaluating local treatment in combination with contemporary systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>In the ARPI era, local treatment should be considered within an individualized, multidisciplinary framework rather than as an automatic standard for patients with mHSPC. Its main value may increasingly lie in preventing local progression and genitourinary complications in selected patients, while a definitive overall survival benefit on top of intensified systemic therapy remains unproven.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2026.2688296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The treatment landscape of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has changed substantially with the introduction of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), which have improved survival outcomes and raised the threshold for demonstrating additional benefit from local interventions. In this setting, the role of local treatment of the primary tumor remains clinically relevant but requires reassessment, taking into account modern systemic intensification.
Areas covered: This expert opinion discusses the current role of local treatment of the primary tumor in mHSPC patients eligible for ARPIs therapy, focusing on prostate radiotherapy and surgery. It examines the evidence supporting radiotherapy in the androgen deprivation therapy era, the uncertainties emerging in the ARPI era, the implications for toxicity and local symptom control, and the rationale for ongoing trials evaluating local treatment in combination with contemporary systemic therapy.
Expert opinion: In the ARPI era, local treatment should be considered within an individualized, multidisciplinary framework rather than as an automatic standard for patients with mHSPC. Its main value may increasingly lie in preventing local progression and genitourinary complications in selected patients, while a definitive overall survival benefit on top of intensified systemic therapy remains unproven.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.