Patch Testing in Paediatric Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Contact Dermatitis Pub Date : 2026-09-08 Epub Date: 2026-06-10 DOI:10.1111/cod.70203
Gabriele Simonetti, Francesco Catamerò, Giulia Liccioli, Leonardo Tomei, Simona Barni, Mattia Giovannini, Lucrezia Sarti, Francesca Mori
{"title":"Patch Testing in Paediatric Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications","authors":"Gabriele Simonetti,&nbsp;Francesco Catamerò,&nbsp;Giulia Liccioli,&nbsp;Leonardo Tomei,&nbsp;Simona Barni,&nbsp;Mattia Giovannini,&nbsp;Lucrezia Sarti,&nbsp;Francesca Mori","doi":"10.1111/cod.70203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are common in children and are diagnostically challenging, with cutaneous manifestations being the most common presentation. Patch testing (PT) is a well-established tool for investigating delayed T-cell-mediated reactions and is widely used in patients with contact dermatitis. However, its role in paediatric DHRs remains unclear. Available data indicate that PT is safe and particularly useful when drug provocation testing is contraindicated, such as in patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions. However, diagnostic yield varies considerably among drug classes and clinical phenotypes. Sensitivity is generally low for beta-lactam and most non–beta-lactam antibiotics, which limits their standalone value in common exanthematous reactions. Higher positivity rates have been reported for antiepileptic drugs, and PT may help identify the culprit drug and assess its cross-reactivity. However, evidence supporting the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol remains scarce. Methodological heterogeneity and limited paediatric-specific data further constrain this interpretation. Overall, PT should be considered as a complementary diagnostic tool integrated with clinical history and other tests, highlighting the need for standardized protocols and prospective paediatric studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"95 4","pages":"349-357"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.70203","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cod.70203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are common in children and are diagnostically challenging, with cutaneous manifestations being the most common presentation. Patch testing (PT) is a well-established tool for investigating delayed T-cell-mediated reactions and is widely used in patients with contact dermatitis. However, its role in paediatric DHRs remains unclear. Available data indicate that PT is safe and particularly useful when drug provocation testing is contraindicated, such as in patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions. However, diagnostic yield varies considerably among drug classes and clinical phenotypes. Sensitivity is generally low for beta-lactam and most non–beta-lactam antibiotics, which limits their standalone value in common exanthematous reactions. Higher positivity rates have been reported for antiepileptic drugs, and PT may help identify the culprit drug and assess its cross-reactivity. However, evidence supporting the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol remains scarce. Methodological heterogeneity and limited paediatric-specific data further constrain this interpretation. Overall, PT should be considered as a complementary diagnostic tool integrated with clinical history and other tests, highlighting the need for standardized protocols and prospective paediatric studies.

贴片试验在儿童药物过敏反应:目前的证据和临床意义。
药物超敏反应(DHRs)在儿童中很常见,并且具有诊断挑战性,皮肤表现是最常见的表现。斑贴试验(PT)是一种完善的工具,用于调查延迟t细胞介导的反应,并广泛用于接触性皮炎患者。然而,它在儿科DHRs中的作用仍不清楚。现有数据表明,PT是安全的,在药物激发试验禁忌时特别有用,例如对有严重皮肤不良反应的患者。然而,诊断产量在药物类别和临床表型之间差异很大。对-内酰胺类和大多数非-内酰胺类抗生素的敏感性一般较低,这限制了它们在常见的疹性反应中的独立价值。据报道,抗癫痫药物的阳性率较高,PT可能有助于识别罪魁祸首药物并评估其交叉反应性。然而,支持使用非甾体抗炎药和扑热息痛的证据仍然很少。方法的异质性和有限的儿科数据进一步限制了这一解释。总的来说,PT应被视为与临床病史和其他测试相结合的补充诊断工具,强调标准化方案和前瞻性儿科研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
30.90%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contact Dermatitis is designed primarily as a journal for clinicians who are interested in various aspects of environmental dermatitis. This includes both allergic and irritant (toxic) types of contact dermatitis, occupational (industrial) dermatitis and consumers" dermatitis from such products as cosmetics and toiletries. The journal aims at promoting and maintaining communication among dermatologists, industrial physicians, allergists and clinical immunologists, as well as chemists and research workers involved in industry and the production of consumer goods. Papers are invited on clinical observations, diagnosis and methods of investigation of patients, therapeutic measures, organisation and legislation relating to the control of occupational and consumers".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书