Pre-delivery prediction of vaginal delivery in late-onset foetal growth restriction: development and internal validation of a model with decision curve analysis and bedside calculator
Manal Massalha, Misgav Rottenstreich, Bryon DeFrance, Kinga Malinowski, Jon F. Barrett, Eran Ashwal
{"title":"Pre-delivery prediction of vaginal delivery in late-onset foetal growth restriction: development and internal validation of a model with decision curve analysis and bedside calculator","authors":"Manal Massalha, Misgav Rottenstreich, Bryon DeFrance, Kinga Malinowski, Jon F. Barrett, Eran Ashwal","doi":"10.1007/s00404-026-08462-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Foetal growth restriction (FGR) complicates 5–10% of pregnancies and is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality. In late-onset FGR, induction of labour is recommended; however, intrapartum caesarean rates remain high (20–40%). Accurate counselling regarding the likelihood of vaginal delivery is essential, yet no validated prediction model exists for this population. We aim to develop and internally validate a pre-delivery prediction model for vaginal delivery in patients with late-onset FGR undergoing a trial of labour, and to assess its clinical utility.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included singleton pregnancies with late-onset FGR managed at a tertiary centre (2017–2024). Eligible patients had no prior caesarean delivery, underwent attempted labour, and had complete Doppler assessment within 7 days of delivery. Logistic regression models were constructed using clinical and Doppler variables. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling, and clinical utility was assessed with decision curve analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 477 patients, 378 (79.2%) achieved vaginal delivery. Nulliparity (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12–0.38; <i>p</i> < 0.001), pre-pregnancy BMI (OR 0.93 per kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI 0.90–0.96; <i>p </i>< 0.001), abnormal cerebroplacental ratio (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28–0.78; <i>p</i> = 0.004), and pre-gestational diabetes (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10–0.78; <i>p</i> = 0.015) were independently associated with lower odds of vaginal delivery. The model demonstrated moderate discrimination (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.70–0.80) and good calibration, with net benefit above a 55% threshold.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This four-variable model provides individualised prediction of vaginal delivery in late-onset FGR. External validation is required before clinical implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"313 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-026-08462-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-026-08462-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Foetal growth restriction (FGR) complicates 5–10% of pregnancies and is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality. In late-onset FGR, induction of labour is recommended; however, intrapartum caesarean rates remain high (20–40%). Accurate counselling regarding the likelihood of vaginal delivery is essential, yet no validated prediction model exists for this population. We aim to develop and internally validate a pre-delivery prediction model for vaginal delivery in patients with late-onset FGR undergoing a trial of labour, and to assess its clinical utility.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included singleton pregnancies with late-onset FGR managed at a tertiary centre (2017–2024). Eligible patients had no prior caesarean delivery, underwent attempted labour, and had complete Doppler assessment within 7 days of delivery. Logistic regression models were constructed using clinical and Doppler variables. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling, and clinical utility was assessed with decision curve analysis.
Results
Among 477 patients, 378 (79.2%) achieved vaginal delivery. Nulliparity (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12–0.38; p < 0.001), pre-pregnancy BMI (OR 0.93 per kg/m2, 95% CI 0.90–0.96; p < 0.001), abnormal cerebroplacental ratio (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28–0.78; p = 0.004), and pre-gestational diabetes (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10–0.78; p = 0.015) were independently associated with lower odds of vaginal delivery. The model demonstrated moderate discrimination (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.70–0.80) and good calibration, with net benefit above a 55% threshold.
Conclusion
This four-variable model provides individualised prediction of vaginal delivery in late-onset FGR. External validation is required before clinical implementation.
目的:胎儿生长受限(FGR)并发症占妊娠的5-10%,是围产期发病率和死亡率的主要原因。对于迟发性FGR,建议引产;然而,产时剖腹产率仍然很高(20-40%)。关于阴道分娩可能性的准确咨询是必不可少的,但目前尚无针对这一人群的有效预测模型。我们的目标是开发和内部验证一个分娩前预测模型,用于阴道分娩的迟发性FGR患者进行试产,并评估其临床效用。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了在三级中心治疗的单胎妊娠迟发性FGR(2017-2024)。符合条件的患者之前没有剖腹产,进行了尝试分娩,并在分娩7天内进行了完整的多普勒评估。采用临床变量和多普勒变量建立Logistic回归模型。内部验证采用自举重采样,临床应用决策曲线分析评估。结果:477例患者中,378例(79.2%)成功阴道分娩。无胎次(OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.38; p 2, 95% CI 0.90-0.96; p)结论:该四变量模型提供了迟发性FGR阴道分娩的个性化预测。临床实施前需要进行外部验证。
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report".
The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.