Pre-delivery prediction of vaginal delivery in late-onset foetal growth restriction: development and internal validation of a model with decision curve analysis and bedside calculator

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2026-06-09 Epub Date: 2026-08-14 DOI:10.1007/s00404-026-08462-8
Manal Massalha, Misgav Rottenstreich, Bryon DeFrance, Kinga Malinowski, Jon F. Barrett, Eran Ashwal
{"title":"Pre-delivery prediction of vaginal delivery in late-onset foetal growth restriction: development and internal validation of a model with decision curve analysis and bedside calculator","authors":"Manal Massalha,&nbsp;Misgav Rottenstreich,&nbsp;Bryon DeFrance,&nbsp;Kinga Malinowski,&nbsp;Jon F. Barrett,&nbsp;Eran Ashwal","doi":"10.1007/s00404-026-08462-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Foetal growth restriction (FGR) complicates 5–10% of pregnancies and is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality. In late-onset FGR, induction of labour is recommended; however, intrapartum caesarean rates remain high (20–40%). Accurate counselling regarding the likelihood of vaginal delivery is essential, yet no validated prediction model exists for this population. We aim to develop and internally validate a pre-delivery prediction model for vaginal delivery in patients with late-onset FGR undergoing a trial of labour, and to assess its clinical utility.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included singleton pregnancies with late-onset FGR managed at a tertiary centre (2017–2024). Eligible patients had no prior caesarean delivery, underwent attempted labour, and had complete Doppler assessment within 7 days of delivery. Logistic regression models were constructed using clinical and Doppler variables. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling, and clinical utility was assessed with decision curve analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 477 patients, 378 (79.2%) achieved vaginal delivery. Nulliparity (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12–0.38; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), pre-pregnancy BMI (OR 0.93 per kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI 0.90–0.96; <i>p </i>&lt; 0.001), abnormal cerebroplacental ratio (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28–0.78; <i>p</i> = 0.004), and pre-gestational diabetes (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10–0.78; <i>p</i> = 0.015) were independently associated with lower odds of vaginal delivery. The model demonstrated moderate discrimination (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.70–0.80) and good calibration, with net benefit above a 55% threshold.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This four-variable model provides individualised prediction of vaginal delivery in late-onset FGR. External validation is required before clinical implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"313 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-026-08462-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-026-08462-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Foetal growth restriction (FGR) complicates 5–10% of pregnancies and is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality. In late-onset FGR, induction of labour is recommended; however, intrapartum caesarean rates remain high (20–40%). Accurate counselling regarding the likelihood of vaginal delivery is essential, yet no validated prediction model exists for this population. We aim to develop and internally validate a pre-delivery prediction model for vaginal delivery in patients with late-onset FGR undergoing a trial of labour, and to assess its clinical utility.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included singleton pregnancies with late-onset FGR managed at a tertiary centre (2017–2024). Eligible patients had no prior caesarean delivery, underwent attempted labour, and had complete Doppler assessment within 7 days of delivery. Logistic regression models were constructed using clinical and Doppler variables. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling, and clinical utility was assessed with decision curve analysis.

Results

Among 477 patients, 378 (79.2%) achieved vaginal delivery. Nulliparity (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12–0.38; p < 0.001), pre-pregnancy BMI (OR 0.93 per kg/m2, 95% CI 0.90–0.96; p < 0.001), abnormal cerebroplacental ratio (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28–0.78; p = 0.004), and pre-gestational diabetes (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10–0.78; p = 0.015) were independently associated with lower odds of vaginal delivery. The model demonstrated moderate discrimination (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.70–0.80) and good calibration, with net benefit above a 55% threshold.

Conclusion

This four-variable model provides individualised prediction of vaginal delivery in late-onset FGR. External validation is required before clinical implementation.

迟发性胎儿生长受限阴道分娩的产前预测:决策曲线分析和床边计算器模型的开发和内部验证。
目的:胎儿生长受限(FGR)并发症占妊娠的5-10%,是围产期发病率和死亡率的主要原因。对于迟发性FGR,建议引产;然而,产时剖腹产率仍然很高(20-40%)。关于阴道分娩可能性的准确咨询是必不可少的,但目前尚无针对这一人群的有效预测模型。我们的目标是开发和内部验证一个分娩前预测模型,用于阴道分娩的迟发性FGR患者进行试产,并评估其临床效用。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了在三级中心治疗的单胎妊娠迟发性FGR(2017-2024)。符合条件的患者之前没有剖腹产,进行了尝试分娩,并在分娩7天内进行了完整的多普勒评估。采用临床变量和多普勒变量建立Logistic回归模型。内部验证采用自举重采样,临床应用决策曲线分析评估。结果:477例患者中,378例(79.2%)成功阴道分娩。无胎次(OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.38; p 2, 95% CI 0.90-0.96; p)结论:该四变量模型提供了迟发性FGR阴道分娩的个性化预测。临床实施前需要进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书