Martina Gambron, Elena Peruzzi, Samantha Perfler, Marcella Montico, Riccardo Cecchin, Elena De Mattia, Michele Spina, Camilla Lisanti, Serena Corsetti, Luisa Foltran, Fabio Puglisi, Rossana Roncato, Erika Cecchin
{"title":"DPYD and UGT1A1 Genotype-Based Dosing for Fluoropyrimidines and Irinotecan Chemotherapy: Variant-Specific Impact on Treatment Intensity and Toxicity","authors":"Martina Gambron, Elena Peruzzi, Samantha Perfler, Marcella Montico, Riccardo Cecchin, Elena De Mattia, Michele Spina, Camilla Lisanti, Serena Corsetti, Luisa Foltran, Fabio Puglisi, Rossana Roncato, Erika Cecchin","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>DPYD</i> and <i>UGT1A1</i> variants significantly affect fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan safety. While genotype-driven dosing reduces severe toxicity, the impact of individual variants remains incompletely investigated. This retrospective cohort study includes 178 cancer patients with a matched actionable <i>DPYD</i> and/or <i>UGT1A1</i> genotypes, defined by the presence of guideline-recommended variants (<i>DPYD</i>: rs3918290, <i>DPYD</i>*2A, c.1905+1G>A; rs55886062, <i>DPYD</i>*13, c.1679T>G; rs67376798, c.2846A>T; rs56038477, c.1236G>A (HapB3); <i>UGT1A1</i>: rs8175347, <i>UGT1A1</i>*28/*37 and rs4148323, <i>UGT1A1</i>*6, c.211G>A), and treated with fluoropyrimidines and/or irinotecan. Patients were classified into standard-of-care (posttreatment genotyping; <i>n</i> = 97) or genotype-driven group (pretreatment genotyping with DPWG-driven dosing; <i>n</i> = 81). Clinically relevant toxicity and relative dose intensity (RDI), a proxy for drug exposure, were evaluated by genotype. Genotype-driven dosing significantly reduced overall clinically relevant toxicity (16.0% vs. 43.3%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among <i>DPYD</i> c.1905+1G>A heterozygous carriers, clinically relevant toxicities occurred only within standard-of-care (61.5% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.007), with lower RDI despite full starting dose (41% [IQR 13–62] vs. 48% [IQR 46–50], <i>p</i> = 0.425). In <i>DPYD</i> c.2846A>T heterozygous carriers, standard-of-care had slightly higher RDI (63% [IQR 54–80] vs. 50% [IQR 43–50], <i>p</i> = 0.007) but doubled toxicity rate (27% vs. 67%, <i>p</i> = 0.092). Conversely, <i>DPYD</i> c.1236G>A (HapB3) heterozygous carriers experienced similarly low toxicity rates (23.7 vs. 13.2, <i>p</i> = 0.375), but genotype-driven dosing markedly reduced RDI (50% [IQR 43–55] vs. 82% [IQR 63–92], <i>p</i> < 0.001). In <i>UGT1A1</i>*28 homozygous carriers, genotype-driven dosing reduced toxicity (21.1% vs. 45.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.086) while preserving comparable RDI (58% [IQR 50–69] vs. 61% [IQR 41–76], <i>p</i> = 0.906). These findings suggest uniform genotype-based strategies may not fully capture variant-specific effects, particularly for <i>DPYD</i> c.1236G>A (HapB3), supporting more flexible dosing approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":"159 10","pages":"2512-2524"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijc.70580","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.70580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
DPYD and UGT1A1 variants significantly affect fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan safety. While genotype-driven dosing reduces severe toxicity, the impact of individual variants remains incompletely investigated. This retrospective cohort study includes 178 cancer patients with a matched actionable DPYD and/or UGT1A1 genotypes, defined by the presence of guideline-recommended variants (DPYD: rs3918290, DPYD*2A, c.1905+1G>A; rs55886062, DPYD*13, c.1679T>G; rs67376798, c.2846A>T; rs56038477, c.1236G>A (HapB3); UGT1A1: rs8175347, UGT1A1*28/*37 and rs4148323, UGT1A1*6, c.211G>A), and treated with fluoropyrimidines and/or irinotecan. Patients were classified into standard-of-care (posttreatment genotyping; n = 97) or genotype-driven group (pretreatment genotyping with DPWG-driven dosing; n = 81). Clinically relevant toxicity and relative dose intensity (RDI), a proxy for drug exposure, were evaluated by genotype. Genotype-driven dosing significantly reduced overall clinically relevant toxicity (16.0% vs. 43.3%; p < 0.001). Among DPYD c.1905+1G>A heterozygous carriers, clinically relevant toxicities occurred only within standard-of-care (61.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.007), with lower RDI despite full starting dose (41% [IQR 13–62] vs. 48% [IQR 46–50], p = 0.425). In DPYD c.2846A>T heterozygous carriers, standard-of-care had slightly higher RDI (63% [IQR 54–80] vs. 50% [IQR 43–50], p = 0.007) but doubled toxicity rate (27% vs. 67%, p = 0.092). Conversely, DPYD c.1236G>A (HapB3) heterozygous carriers experienced similarly low toxicity rates (23.7 vs. 13.2, p = 0.375), but genotype-driven dosing markedly reduced RDI (50% [IQR 43–55] vs. 82% [IQR 63–92], p < 0.001). In UGT1A1*28 homozygous carriers, genotype-driven dosing reduced toxicity (21.1% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.086) while preserving comparable RDI (58% [IQR 50–69] vs. 61% [IQR 41–76], p = 0.906). These findings suggest uniform genotype-based strategies may not fully capture variant-specific effects, particularly for DPYD c.1236G>A (HapB3), supporting more flexible dosing approaches.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories:
-Cancer Epidemiology-
Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics-
Infectious Causes of Cancer-
Innovative Tools and Methods-
Molecular Cancer Biology-
Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment-
Tumor Markers and Signatures-
Cancer Therapy and Prevention