DPYD and UGT1A1 Genotype-Based Dosing for Fluoropyrimidines and Irinotecan Chemotherapy: Variant-Specific Impact on Treatment Intensity and Toxicity

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2026-09-22 Epub Date: 2026-06-09 DOI:10.1002/ijc.70580
Martina Gambron, Elena Peruzzi, Samantha Perfler, Marcella Montico, Riccardo Cecchin, Elena De Mattia, Michele Spina, Camilla Lisanti, Serena Corsetti, Luisa Foltran, Fabio Puglisi, Rossana Roncato, Erika Cecchin
{"title":"DPYD and UGT1A1 Genotype-Based Dosing for Fluoropyrimidines and Irinotecan Chemotherapy: Variant-Specific Impact on Treatment Intensity and Toxicity","authors":"Martina Gambron,&nbsp;Elena Peruzzi,&nbsp;Samantha Perfler,&nbsp;Marcella Montico,&nbsp;Riccardo Cecchin,&nbsp;Elena De Mattia,&nbsp;Michele Spina,&nbsp;Camilla Lisanti,&nbsp;Serena Corsetti,&nbsp;Luisa Foltran,&nbsp;Fabio Puglisi,&nbsp;Rossana Roncato,&nbsp;Erika Cecchin","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>DPYD</i> and <i>UGT1A1</i> variants significantly affect fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan safety. While genotype-driven dosing reduces severe toxicity, the impact of individual variants remains incompletely investigated. This retrospective cohort study includes 178 cancer patients with a matched actionable <i>DPYD</i> and/or <i>UGT1A1</i> genotypes, defined by the presence of guideline-recommended variants (<i>DPYD</i>: rs3918290, <i>DPYD</i>*2A, c.1905+1G&gt;A; rs55886062, <i>DPYD</i>*13, c.1679T&gt;G; rs67376798, c.2846A&gt;T; rs56038477, c.1236G&gt;A (HapB3); <i>UGT1A1</i>: rs8175347, <i>UGT1A1</i>*28/*37 and rs4148323, <i>UGT1A1</i>*6, c.211G&gt;A), and treated with fluoropyrimidines and/or irinotecan. Patients were classified into standard-of-care (posttreatment genotyping; <i>n</i> = 97) or genotype-driven group (pretreatment genotyping with DPWG-driven dosing; <i>n</i> = 81). Clinically relevant toxicity and relative dose intensity (RDI), a proxy for drug exposure, were evaluated by genotype. Genotype-driven dosing significantly reduced overall clinically relevant toxicity (16.0% vs. 43.3%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Among <i>DPYD</i> c.1905+1G&gt;A heterozygous carriers, clinically relevant toxicities occurred only within standard-of-care (61.5% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.007), with lower RDI despite full starting dose (41% [IQR 13–62] vs. 48% [IQR 46–50], <i>p</i> = 0.425). In <i>DPYD</i> c.2846A&gt;T heterozygous carriers, standard-of-care had slightly higher RDI (63% [IQR 54–80] vs. 50% [IQR 43–50], <i>p</i> = 0.007) but doubled toxicity rate (27% vs. 67%, <i>p</i> = 0.092). Conversely, <i>DPYD</i> c.1236G&gt;A (HapB3) heterozygous carriers experienced similarly low toxicity rates (23.7 vs. 13.2, <i>p</i> = 0.375), but genotype-driven dosing markedly reduced RDI (50% [IQR 43–55] vs. 82% [IQR 63–92], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In <i>UGT1A1</i>*28 homozygous carriers, genotype-driven dosing reduced toxicity (21.1% vs. 45.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.086) while preserving comparable RDI (58% [IQR 50–69] vs. 61% [IQR 41–76], <i>p</i> = 0.906). These findings suggest uniform genotype-based strategies may not fully capture variant-specific effects, particularly for <i>DPYD</i> c.1236G&gt;A (HapB3), supporting more flexible dosing approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":"159 10","pages":"2512-2524"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijc.70580","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.70580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DPYD and UGT1A1 variants significantly affect fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan safety. While genotype-driven dosing reduces severe toxicity, the impact of individual variants remains incompletely investigated. This retrospective cohort study includes 178 cancer patients with a matched actionable DPYD and/or UGT1A1 genotypes, defined by the presence of guideline-recommended variants (DPYD: rs3918290, DPYD*2A, c.1905+1G>A; rs55886062, DPYD*13, c.1679T>G; rs67376798, c.2846A>T; rs56038477, c.1236G>A (HapB3); UGT1A1: rs8175347, UGT1A1*28/*37 and rs4148323, UGT1A1*6, c.211G>A), and treated with fluoropyrimidines and/or irinotecan. Patients were classified into standard-of-care (posttreatment genotyping; n = 97) or genotype-driven group (pretreatment genotyping with DPWG-driven dosing; n = 81). Clinically relevant toxicity and relative dose intensity (RDI), a proxy for drug exposure, were evaluated by genotype. Genotype-driven dosing significantly reduced overall clinically relevant toxicity (16.0% vs. 43.3%; p < 0.001). Among DPYD c.1905+1G>A heterozygous carriers, clinically relevant toxicities occurred only within standard-of-care (61.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.007), with lower RDI despite full starting dose (41% [IQR 13–62] vs. 48% [IQR 46–50], p = 0.425). In DPYD c.2846A>T heterozygous carriers, standard-of-care had slightly higher RDI (63% [IQR 54–80] vs. 50% [IQR 43–50], p = 0.007) but doubled toxicity rate (27% vs. 67%, p = 0.092). Conversely, DPYD c.1236G>A (HapB3) heterozygous carriers experienced similarly low toxicity rates (23.7 vs. 13.2, p = 0.375), but genotype-driven dosing markedly reduced RDI (50% [IQR 43–55] vs. 82% [IQR 63–92], p < 0.001). In UGT1A1*28 homozygous carriers, genotype-driven dosing reduced toxicity (21.1% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.086) while preserving comparable RDI (58% [IQR 50–69] vs. 61% [IQR 41–76], p = 0.906). These findings suggest uniform genotype-based strategies may not fully capture variant-specific effects, particularly for DPYD c.1236G>A (HapB3), supporting more flexible dosing approaches.

基于DPYD和UGT1A1基因型的氟嘧啶和伊立替康化疗剂量:对治疗强度和毒性的变异特异性影响
DPYD和UGT1A1变异显著影响氟嘧啶和伊立替康的安全性。虽然基因型驱动的剂量减少了严重的毒性,但个体变异的影响仍未完全研究。本回顾性队列研究纳入178例具有匹配的可操作DPYD和/或UGT1A1基因型的癌症患者,根据存在指南推荐的变异(DPYD: rs3918290, DPYD*2A, c.1905+1G> a; rs55886062, DPYD*13, c.1679T>G; rs67376798, c.2846A>T;UGT1A1: rs8175347, UGT1A1*28/*37和rs4148323, UGT1A1*6, c.211G>A),用氟嘧啶和/或伊立替康处理。将患者分为标准治疗组(治疗后基因分型,n = 97)和基因分型驱动组(dpwg驱动给药的预处理基因分型,n = 81)。临床相关毒性和相对剂量强度(RDI)是药物暴露的一个代表,通过基因型进行评估。基因型驱动的给药显著降低了总体临床相关毒性(16.0%对43.3%;p)。对于杂合携带者,临床相关毒性仅发生在标准治疗范围内(61.5%对0%,p = 0.007),尽管完全开始剂量,RDI仍较低(41% [IQR 13-62]对48% [IQR 46-50], p = 0.425)。在DPYD c.2846A>T杂合携带者中,标准护理的RDI略高(63% [IQR 54-80]对50% [IQR 43-50], p = 0.007),但毒性率翻了一倍(27%对67%,p = 0.092)。相反,DPYD c.1236G b> A (HapB3)杂合携带者的毒性率同样较低(23.7 vs. 13.2, p = 0.375),但基因型驱动的给药显著降低了RDI (50% [IQR 43-55] vs. 82% [IQR 63-92], p A (HapB3),支持更灵活的给药方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书