Performance of Tropical Cyclone Forecasts in the Western North Pacific in 2025. Part Ⅰ: Track and Intensity

IF 5.1 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Tropical Cyclone Research and Review Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-05 DOI:10.1016/j.tcrr.2026.04.002
Mengqi Yang , Guomin Chen , Gaozhen Nie , Chen Chen , Tong Xu
{"title":"Performance of Tropical Cyclone Forecasts in the Western North Pacific in 2025. Part Ⅰ: Track and Intensity","authors":"Mengqi Yang ,&nbsp;Guomin Chen ,&nbsp;Gaozhen Nie ,&nbsp;Chen Chen ,&nbsp;Tong Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.tcrr.2026.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the performance of operational tropical cyclone (TC) track and intensity forecasts over the western North Pacific (WNP) during the 2025 season. The 2025 WNP TC season was very active, featuring 27 named TCs. Forecasts from five official typhoon prediction agencies, eight deterministic Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models, six deterministic data-driven Artificial Intelligence Weather Prediction (AIWP) models, and five Ensemble Prediction Systems (EPS) are verified at lead times from 12 to 120 h. Results indicate that TC track forecasts achieved reduced mean direct position errors (DPEs) at 24 h compared to 2024, with some reaching historically low error levels. However, the large westward bias in forecasts for Super Typhoon Halong (TC2522) substantially influenced long-lead time statistics. Differences in track errors among AIWP models increased progressively beyond 48 h. For intensity, mean absolute errors (MAEs) increased with lead time. NWP models outperformed AIWP models, with the latter consistently underestimating intensity across all lead times, though the degree of underestimation decreased relative to 2024. These findings highlight not only the improvement in TC track forecast capability but also the persistent challenges in intensity forecasting, particularly for AIWP models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44442,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 193-202"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603226000299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of operational tropical cyclone (TC) track and intensity forecasts over the western North Pacific (WNP) during the 2025 season. The 2025 WNP TC season was very active, featuring 27 named TCs. Forecasts from five official typhoon prediction agencies, eight deterministic Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models, six deterministic data-driven Artificial Intelligence Weather Prediction (AIWP) models, and five Ensemble Prediction Systems (EPS) are verified at lead times from 12 to 120 h. Results indicate that TC track forecasts achieved reduced mean direct position errors (DPEs) at 24 h compared to 2024, with some reaching historically low error levels. However, the large westward bias in forecasts for Super Typhoon Halong (TC2522) substantially influenced long-lead time statistics. Differences in track errors among AIWP models increased progressively beyond 48 h. For intensity, mean absolute errors (MAEs) increased with lead time. NWP models outperformed AIWP models, with the latter consistently underestimating intensity across all lead times, though the degree of underestimation decreased relative to 2024. These findings highlight not only the improvement in TC track forecast capability but also the persistent challenges in intensity forecasting, particularly for AIWP models.
2025年西北太平洋热带气旋预报的表现。部分Ⅰ:轨道和强度
本研究评估了2025年季节西北太平洋(WNP)热带气旋(TC)运行路径和强度预报的性能。2025年WNP TC赛季非常活跃,共有27个命名TC。对5个官方台风预报机构、8个确定性数值天气预报(NWP)模式、6个确定性数据驱动人工智能天气预报(AIWP)模式和5个集成预报系统(EPS)在12 ~ 120 h的预报时间进行了验证。结果表明,与2024年相比,台风路径预报在24 h的平均直接位置误差(DPEs)有所降低,部分误差达到历史最低水平。然而,超级台风下龙(TC2522)的预报偏西较大,严重影响了长提前期统计。AIWP模型间航迹误差的差异在48 h后逐渐增加。对于强度,平均绝对误差(MAEs)随提前期增加而增加。NWP模型优于AIWP模型,AIWP模型在所有提前期都持续低估了强度,尽管相对于2024年低估的程度有所下降。这些发现不仅表明了TC轨迹预测能力的提高,而且表明了强度预测(特别是AIWP模型)面临的持续挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Cyclone Research and Review
Tropical Cyclone Research and Review METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
184
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Cyclone Research and Review is an international journal focusing on tropical cyclone monitoring, forecasting, and research as well as associated hydrological effects and disaster risk reduction. This journal is edited and published by the ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee (TC) and the Shanghai Typhoon Institute of the China Meteorology Administration (STI/CMA). Contributions from all tropical cyclone basins are welcome. Scope of the journal includes: • Reviews of tropical cyclones exhibiting unusual characteristics or behavior or resulting in disastrous impacts on Typhoon Committee Members and other regional WMO bodies • Advances in applied and basic tropical cyclone research or technology to improve tropical cyclone forecasts and warnings • Basic theoretical studies of tropical cyclones • Event reports, compelling images, and topic review reports of tropical cyclones • Impacts, risk assessments, and risk management techniques related to tropical cyclones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书