Consciously detecting and recognizing a past visual word after its sensory trace is gone.

IF 6.4
Daphné Rimsky Robert, Matteo Lisi, Kevin Nguy, Roxane Jannin, Thomas Hardy, Nathan Beraud, Claire Sergent
{"title":"Consciously detecting and recognizing a past visual word after its sensory trace is gone.","authors":"Daphné Rimsky Robert, Matteo Lisi, Kevin Nguy, Roxane Jannin, Thomas Hardy, Nathan Beraud, Claire Sergent","doi":"10.1038/s44271-026-00478-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What is the role of sensory processing in conscious perception? Current theories of consciousness are divided on this question. Some propose that conscious perception arises during the buildup of sensory representations. Others argue for a secondary process that broadcasts these representations to higher-level areas. This second view makes a counter-intuitive prediction: one could consciously perceive abstract representations untied to any low-level sensory feature. We tested this prediction by combining visual masking with retrospective cueing. We found that when visually masked words were followed by a semantically related auditory word, participants were better at detecting this past word and reporting its identity, but were strikingly unable to report its visual features (letter casing or position on screen). This suggests that retro-cueing can help a semantic representation reach awareness even after the associated sensory information has been masked. The mechanisms of conscious access might thus be largely independent of early sensory build-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00478-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What is the role of sensory processing in conscious perception? Current theories of consciousness are divided on this question. Some propose that conscious perception arises during the buildup of sensory representations. Others argue for a secondary process that broadcasts these representations to higher-level areas. This second view makes a counter-intuitive prediction: one could consciously perceive abstract representations untied to any low-level sensory feature. We tested this prediction by combining visual masking with retrospective cueing. We found that when visually masked words were followed by a semantically related auditory word, participants were better at detecting this past word and reporting its identity, but were strikingly unable to report its visual features (letter casing or position on screen). This suggests that retro-cueing can help a semantic representation reach awareness even after the associated sensory information has been masked. The mechanisms of conscious access might thus be largely independent of early sensory build-up.

在感官痕迹消失后,有意识地检测和识别过去的视觉单词。
感觉加工在意识知觉中的作用是什么?目前关于意识的理论在这个问题上存在分歧。一些人提出,意识知觉是在感官表征的积累过程中产生的。另一些人则主张建立一个二级过程,将这些表示广播到更高级别的区域。第二种观点做出了一个反直觉的预测:一个人可以有意识地感知与任何低级感官特征无关的抽象表征。我们通过结合视觉掩蔽和回顾性提示来测试这一预测。我们发现,当视觉上隐藏的单词后面跟着一个语义上相关的听觉单词时,参与者更善于发现这个过去的单词并报告它的身份,但却明显无法报告它的视觉特征(字母大小写或在屏幕上的位置)。这表明,即使在相关的感官信息被掩盖之后,回溯线索也能帮助语义表征获得意识。因此,意识接触的机制可能在很大程度上独立于早期的感觉建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书