Atlas of Arctic bone modification

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2026-06-08 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70311
Madison Gaetano, Eric J. Wald, Patrick Druckenmiller, Joshua H. Miller
{"title":"Atlas of Arctic bone modification","authors":"Madison Gaetano,&nbsp;Eric J. Wald,&nbsp;Patrick Druckenmiller,&nbsp;Joshua H. Miller","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Skeletal bones and antlers from past generations of wildlife are frequently found and consumed by other animals, living out a second life as an important dietary resource. Such gnawing may leave characteristic modifications, including tooth marks, providing physical evidence of a behavior and nutrient resource that is often challenging to directly observe and quantify. Documenting and interpreting features of bone modification can fill knowledge gaps regarding species' behavioral ecology, nutrient requirements, and interactions in modern ecosystems, as well as in historical, archaeological, and paleontological contexts. While prior research has documented characteristic patterns of bone modification and gnawing for a variety of bone consumers, these studies generally focus on a single species or taxonomic group, with only limited comparison to bone modifications generated by co-occurring groups (i.e., ruminants vs. carnivorans vs. rodents). Cataloging bone modifications at ecosystem scales has rarely been the focus of past work, which may be partially responsible for a profound gap in existing knowledge regarding how co-occurring and competing bone consumers partition this shared source of nutrients (e.g., calcium, phosphorus, and calorie-rich marrow). Here, we compiled available literature on bone modifications made by rodents, ungulates (specifically ruminants), and carnivorans. Using this compilation as a starting point, we characterized the full suite of modifications observed on 1567 shed antlers and 224 skeletal bones collected during standardized bone surveys along the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Alaska). In total, we described, summarized, and photographed 27 distinct classes of pits, punctures, scores, furrows and fractures, and, when possible, identified the taxonomic group that is known or likely responsible for each modification class. Seven of these classes, all attributed to ruminants (likely caribou), have not been previously described. Each antler and skeletal bone was then evaluated for occurrences of the 27 modification classes. This dataset provides a resource to evaluate patterns of bone gnawing for multiple taxonomic groups (ruminants, carnivorans, rodents) and to assess resource competition and partitioning among co-occurring species and trophic guilds. A unique strength of this dataset is that it includes the largest assessment of bone modifications on a single skeletal element (antlers), providing unparalleled opportunities to evaluate variability in bone modification across space (~200 km) and through time (antlers can persist on tundra surfaces for hundreds to thousands of years). To provide a visual guide and reference for evaluating bone modification features, including those not observed on the Coastal Plain, we established a photographic atlas of Arctic bone modification classes. This resource characterizes bone modifications generated by ruminants, carnivorans, and rodents, as well as those generated by trampling and other incidental interactions between bones and living animals (e.g., rubbing antlers on rocks or other surfaces while attached to the skull). The broad taxonomic groups included in the Atlas of Arctic Bone Modification are globally common and regularly co-occur, making it a widely relevant interpretational guide. Incorporating assessments of bone modification and consumption can contribute to a more holistic understanding of mammalian dietary ecology and nutrient cycling at the population and community levels. The dataset is released under the Creative Commons Attributional Noncommercial 4.0 Public Domain Dedication. Citation of this publication and the dataset is required when data are reused.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70311","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skeletal bones and antlers from past generations of wildlife are frequently found and consumed by other animals, living out a second life as an important dietary resource. Such gnawing may leave characteristic modifications, including tooth marks, providing physical evidence of a behavior and nutrient resource that is often challenging to directly observe and quantify. Documenting and interpreting features of bone modification can fill knowledge gaps regarding species' behavioral ecology, nutrient requirements, and interactions in modern ecosystems, as well as in historical, archaeological, and paleontological contexts. While prior research has documented characteristic patterns of bone modification and gnawing for a variety of bone consumers, these studies generally focus on a single species or taxonomic group, with only limited comparison to bone modifications generated by co-occurring groups (i.e., ruminants vs. carnivorans vs. rodents). Cataloging bone modifications at ecosystem scales has rarely been the focus of past work, which may be partially responsible for a profound gap in existing knowledge regarding how co-occurring and competing bone consumers partition this shared source of nutrients (e.g., calcium, phosphorus, and calorie-rich marrow). Here, we compiled available literature on bone modifications made by rodents, ungulates (specifically ruminants), and carnivorans. Using this compilation as a starting point, we characterized the full suite of modifications observed on 1567 shed antlers and 224 skeletal bones collected during standardized bone surveys along the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Alaska). In total, we described, summarized, and photographed 27 distinct classes of pits, punctures, scores, furrows and fractures, and, when possible, identified the taxonomic group that is known or likely responsible for each modification class. Seven of these classes, all attributed to ruminants (likely caribou), have not been previously described. Each antler and skeletal bone was then evaluated for occurrences of the 27 modification classes. This dataset provides a resource to evaluate patterns of bone gnawing for multiple taxonomic groups (ruminants, carnivorans, rodents) and to assess resource competition and partitioning among co-occurring species and trophic guilds. A unique strength of this dataset is that it includes the largest assessment of bone modifications on a single skeletal element (antlers), providing unparalleled opportunities to evaluate variability in bone modification across space (~200 km) and through time (antlers can persist on tundra surfaces for hundreds to thousands of years). To provide a visual guide and reference for evaluating bone modification features, including those not observed on the Coastal Plain, we established a photographic atlas of Arctic bone modification classes. This resource characterizes bone modifications generated by ruminants, carnivorans, and rodents, as well as those generated by trampling and other incidental interactions between bones and living animals (e.g., rubbing antlers on rocks or other surfaces while attached to the skull). The broad taxonomic groups included in the Atlas of Arctic Bone Modification are globally common and regularly co-occur, making it a widely relevant interpretational guide. Incorporating assessments of bone modification and consumption can contribute to a more holistic understanding of mammalian dietary ecology and nutrient cycling at the population and community levels. The dataset is released under the Creative Commons Attributional Noncommercial 4.0 Public Domain Dedication. Citation of this publication and the dataset is required when data are reused.

北极骨修饰图集。
过去几代野生动物的骨骼和鹿角经常被其他动物发现和食用,作为重要的饮食资源度过了第二次生命。这种啃咬可能会留下特征变化,包括牙印,为直接观察和量化通常具有挑战性的行为和营养资源提供物理证据。记录和解释骨骼修饰的特征可以填补现代生态系统中物种行为生态学、营养需求和相互作用方面的知识空白,以及在历史、考古和古生物背景下的知识空白。虽然先前的研究已经记录了各种骨骼消费者的骨修饰和啃咬的特征模式,但这些研究通常集中在单一物种或分类群体上,仅对共同发生的群体(即反刍动物与食肉动物与啮齿动物)产生的骨修饰进行了有限的比较。在生态系统尺度上对骨骼变化进行编目很少是过去工作的重点,这可能是现有知识中存在深刻差距的部分原因,即共同发生和竞争的骨骼消费者如何分配这种共享的营养来源(例如,钙、磷和富含卡路里的骨髓)。在这里,我们汇编了有关啮齿动物、有蹄类动物(特别是反刍动物)和食肉动物骨骼修饰的现有文献。以该汇编为起点,我们描述了在北极国家野生动物保护区(阿拉斯加)沿海平原标准化骨骼调查中收集的1567只鹿角和224块骨骼观察到的整套变化。总的来说,我们描述、总结和拍摄了27种不同类型的坑、刺、分数、沟和骨折,并在可能的情况下确定了已知或可能导致每种修改类型的分类群。其中7类动物都属于反刍动物(很可能是驯鹿),以前从未被描述过。然后对每个鹿角和骨骼进行27种修饰类型的评估。该数据集为评估多个分类类群(反刍动物、食肉动物、啮齿动物)的啃骨模式以及评估共生物种和营养行会之间的资源竞争和分配提供了资源。该数据集的独特之处在于,它包含了对单个骨骼元素(鹿角)骨骼变化的最大评估,为评估跨空间(约200公里)和时间(鹿角可以在冻原表面持续数百至数千年)骨骼变化的可变性提供了无与伦比的机会。为了给评估骨修饰特征(包括在沿海平原未观察到的骨修饰特征)提供视觉指导和参考,我们建立了北极骨修饰类别的摄影地图集。这一资源的特点是由反刍动物、食肉动物和啮齿动物产生的骨修饰,以及由践踏和其他偶然的骨骼与活体动物之间的相互作用(例如,鹿角附着在头骨上时在岩石或其他表面摩擦)产生的骨修饰。北极骨修饰图集中包含的广泛分类群在全球范围内是常见的,并且经常共同出现,使其成为广泛相关的解释指南。结合对骨骼修饰和消耗的评估有助于在种群和群落水平上更全面地了解哺乳动物的饮食生态和营养循环。该数据集在知识共享署名非商业性4.0公共领域奉献协议下发布。当数据被重用时,需要引用该出版物和数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书