Technology-based psychosocial education for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 Q2 NURSING
Ice Septriani Saragih, Huey-Ming Tzeng, Irwan Susanto, Ita Daryanti Saragih
{"title":"Technology-based psychosocial education for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ice Septriani Saragih, Huey-Ming Tzeng, Irwan Susanto, Ita Daryanti Saragih","doi":"10.1177/17449871261442808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Technology-based health interventions present innovative and scalable approaches to enhance cancer care. These interventions have potential to support psychosocial well-being, which is often challenged following a cancer diagnosis and throughout survivorship. Such innovations also enable nurses to extend psychosocial support beyond traditional clinical settings and align with health policy efforts to integrate digital supportive care into routine oncology services.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of technology-based psychosocial education interventions for cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline [Ovid], PubMed and Web of Science) were searched from inception to 29 April 2025. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool (RoB 2) was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were calculated to synthesise outcomes measured using varied tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including 1509 participants. Technology-based psychosocial education interventions significantly reduced fear of cancer recurrence (SMD = -0.21; 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.01; <i>I</i>² = 4.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.04). Non-significant pooled estimates were observed for reduced psychological distress (SMD = -0.23; 95% CI: -0.61 to 0.15; <i>I</i>² = 76.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.23) and improved quality of life (SMD = 0.21; 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.45; <i>I</i>² = 20.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Technology-based psychosocial education interventions show promise in reducing fear of cancer recurrence and may support broader psychosocial outcomes. These interventions are scalable and suitable for diverse clinical settings, supporting nurse-led psychosocial education, remote patient follow-up and the integration of digital supportive care within oncology service delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871261442808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13242360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871261442808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Technology-based health interventions present innovative and scalable approaches to enhance cancer care. These interventions have potential to support psychosocial well-being, which is often challenged following a cancer diagnosis and throughout survivorship. Such innovations also enable nurses to extend psychosocial support beyond traditional clinical settings and align with health policy efforts to integrate digital supportive care into routine oncology services.

Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of technology-based psychosocial education interventions for cancer patients.

Methods: Six databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline [Ovid], PubMed and Web of Science) were searched from inception to 29 April 2025. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool (RoB 2) was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were calculated to synthesise outcomes measured using varied tools.

Results: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including 1509 participants. Technology-based psychosocial education interventions significantly reduced fear of cancer recurrence (SMD = -0.21; 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.01; I² = 4.7%; p = 0.04). Non-significant pooled estimates were observed for reduced psychological distress (SMD = -0.23; 95% CI: -0.61 to 0.15; I² = 76.1%; p = 0.23) and improved quality of life (SMD = 0.21; 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.45; I² = 20.0%; p = 0.08).

Conclusion: Technology-based psychosocial education interventions show promise in reducing fear of cancer recurrence and may support broader psychosocial outcomes. These interventions are scalable and suitable for diverse clinical settings, supporting nurse-led psychosocial education, remote patient follow-up and the integration of digital supportive care within oncology service delivery.

基于技术的癌症患者心理教育:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:以技术为基础的卫生干预为加强癌症治疗提供了创新和可扩展的方法。这些干预措施有可能支持心理社会健康,这在癌症诊断后和整个生存过程中经常受到挑战。这些创新还使护士能够将社会心理支持扩展到传统临床环境之外,并与卫生政策努力保持一致,将数字支持护理纳入常规肿瘤学服务。目的:评价以技术为基础的心理社会教育干预对癌症患者的效果。方法:检索自成立至2025年4月29日的6个数据库(CINAHL、Cochrane Library、Embase、Medline [Ovid]、PubMed和Web of Science)。采用Cochrane风险偏倚工具(RoB 2)评估纳入研究的方法学质量。计算标准化平均差异(SMDs),以综合使用各种工具测量的结果。结果:14项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入1509名受试者。基于技术的社会心理教育干预显著降低了对癌症复发的恐惧(SMD = -0.21; 95% CI: -0.42至-0.01;I²= 4.7%;p = 0.04)。在减少心理困扰(SMD = -0.23; 95% CI: -0.61至0.15;I²= 76.1%;p = 0.23)和改善生活质量(SMD = 0.21; 95% CI: -0.02至0.45;I²= 20.0%;p = 0.08)方面观察到非显著汇总估计。结论:基于技术的社会心理教育干预有望减少对癌症复发的恐惧,并可能支持更广泛的社会心理结果。这些干预措施是可扩展的,适用于不同的临床环境,支持护士主导的社会心理教育、远程患者随访和在肿瘤服务提供中整合数字支持护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书