Comparative Evaluation of Selective Laser Capsulotomy and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy in White Cataract.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Manpreet Kaur, Jeewan S Titiyal, Vaibhav Namdev, Jyoti Rawat, Manvi Bansal
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Selective Laser Capsulotomy and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy in White Cataract.","authors":"Manpreet Kaur, Jeewan S Titiyal, Vaibhav Namdev, Jyoti Rawat, Manvi Bansal","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20260408-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate morphological characteristics of capsulotomy created using selective laser capsulotomy (SLC) (CAPSULaser device; Excel-Lens, Inc) or femtosecond laser (FSL) (LenSx; Alcon Laboratories, Inc) in white cataract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective non-randomized comparative study of 40 patients with white cataract who had phacoemulsification. A 5-mm capsulotomy was planned using SLC (n = 20) or FSL (n = 20). The primary outcome measure was capsulotomy size. Secondary outcomes were capsulotomy circularity, intraocular lens (IOL) coverage, centration, continuity, and residual microadhesions. Follow-up was performed on postoperative days 1 and 30.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 65.3 ± 8.8 years (18 men, 22 women). Residual microadhesions were observed in 2 eyes (10%) in the SLC group and 11 eyes (55%) in the FSL group (<i>P</i> = .002). Release of milky fluid did not obscure laser delivery in the SLC group, but hampered laser delivery in the FSL group. On postoperative day 1, mean capsulotomy diameter was 4.45 ± 0.17 mm in the SLC group and 5.03 ± 0.07 mm in the FSL group (<i>P</i> < .001). Circularity index was comparable (SLC group: 0.993 ± 0.01, FSL group: 0.996 ± 0.005; <i>P</i> = .25), with 360° IOL coverage in both groups. Overlap index was 0.66 ± 0.27 in the SLC group and 0.84 ± 0.11 in the FSL group (<i>P</i> = .01). Decentration was significantly greater with SLC (SLC group: 0.37 ± 0.37 mm, FSL group: 0.09 ± 0.07 mm; <i>P</i> = .004). No case had radial tear of capsulotomy or posterior capsule rent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both FSL and SLC are safe and effective to create circular continuous capsulotomies in white cataract. FSL capsulotomies are more predictable in terms of size and centration. SLC capsulotomies have fewer microadhesions because fast capsulotomy creation does not allow milky cortex to obscure laser delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"42 6","pages":"e522-e528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20260408-03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate morphological characteristics of capsulotomy created using selective laser capsulotomy (SLC) (CAPSULaser device; Excel-Lens, Inc) or femtosecond laser (FSL) (LenSx; Alcon Laboratories, Inc) in white cataract.

Methods: This was a prospective non-randomized comparative study of 40 patients with white cataract who had phacoemulsification. A 5-mm capsulotomy was planned using SLC (n = 20) or FSL (n = 20). The primary outcome measure was capsulotomy size. Secondary outcomes were capsulotomy circularity, intraocular lens (IOL) coverage, centration, continuity, and residual microadhesions. Follow-up was performed on postoperative days 1 and 30.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 65.3 ± 8.8 years (18 men, 22 women). Residual microadhesions were observed in 2 eyes (10%) in the SLC group and 11 eyes (55%) in the FSL group (P = .002). Release of milky fluid did not obscure laser delivery in the SLC group, but hampered laser delivery in the FSL group. On postoperative day 1, mean capsulotomy diameter was 4.45 ± 0.17 mm in the SLC group and 5.03 ± 0.07 mm in the FSL group (P < .001). Circularity index was comparable (SLC group: 0.993 ± 0.01, FSL group: 0.996 ± 0.005; P = .25), with 360° IOL coverage in both groups. Overlap index was 0.66 ± 0.27 in the SLC group and 0.84 ± 0.11 in the FSL group (P = .01). Decentration was significantly greater with SLC (SLC group: 0.37 ± 0.37 mm, FSL group: 0.09 ± 0.07 mm; P = .004). No case had radial tear of capsulotomy or posterior capsule rent.

Conclusions: Both FSL and SLC are safe and effective to create circular continuous capsulotomies in white cataract. FSL capsulotomies are more predictable in terms of size and centration. SLC capsulotomies have fewer microadhesions because fast capsulotomy creation does not allow milky cortex to obscure laser delivery.

选择性激光包膜切开术与飞秒激光辅助包膜切开术治疗白色白内障的比较评价。
目的:评价选择性激光包膜切开术(SLC) (capsule laser device; Excel-Lens, Inc .)或飞秒激光(FSL) (LenSx; Alcon Laboratories, Inc .)对白色白内障的形态特征。方法:对40例行超声乳化术的白色白内障患者进行前瞻性非随机对照研究。计划采用SLC (n = 20)或FSL (n = 20)行5mm囊膜切开术。主要结局指标为囊膜切开大小。次要结果是囊膜切开后的圆度、人工晶状体(IOL)覆盖、集中、连续性和残留微粘连。术后第1、30天随访。结果:患者平均年龄65.3±8.8岁(男18例,女22例)。SLC组2眼(10%)残留微粘连,FSL组11眼(55%)残留微粘连(P = 0.002)。乳白色液体的释放不会影响SLC组的激光传递,但会阻碍FSL组的激光传递。术后第1天,SLC组的平均囊膜切开直径为4.45±0.17 mm, FSL组的平均囊膜切开直径为5.03±0.07 mm (P < 0.001)。圆度指数具有可比性(SLC组:0.993±0.01,FSL组:0.996±0.005,P = 0.25),两组人工晶状体覆盖率均为360°。SLC组的重叠指数为0.66±0.27,FSL组的重叠指数为0.84±0.11 (P = 0.01)。SLC组分散程度显著高于SLC组(SLC组:0.37±0.37 mm, FSL组:0.09±0.07 mm; P = 0.004)。无后囊膜撕裂或后囊破裂。结论:FSL和SLC均可安全、有效地用于白色白内障环形连续囊切开术。FSL囊切开术在大小和集中方面更可预测。SLC囊腔切开术有较少的微粘连,因为快速囊腔切开术不允许乳状皮质遮挡激光传输。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书