Reuse of the ReCell Enzyme Does Not Decrease the Density of Spray Cell Suspension While Significantly Reducing Costs.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Derek M Culnan, Alexandria Gudeman, Jay Coates, Elizabeth Blears, Genevieve B Culnan, Guillermo Foncerrada, David N Herndon
{"title":"Reuse of the ReCell Enzyme Does Not Decrease the Density of Spray Cell Suspension While Significantly Reducing Costs.","authors":"Derek M Culnan, Alexandria Gudeman, Jay Coates, Elizabeth Blears, Genevieve B Culnan, Guillermo Foncerrada, David N Herndon","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irag086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spray cell suspension (SCS) represents a commonplace tool to augment skin grafting; however, the kit required to make the suspension is costly. We hypothesize that repeated use of SCS will result in similar cell counts and graft results while decreasing hospital charges. Our institution used the enzyme from one ReCell kit repeatedly while counting cell dosage and tracking clinical outcomes. Six patients aged 8-86 years, with TBSA 8%-50% and Baux scores of 18-144, had 9 surgeries with SCS. All survived to discharge with 95% wound closure from 7 to 21 days after the first grafting (mode 7 days). Cell dosing was 20 716 ± 2346 cells/cm2. This is 1/3829th the dose of cultured epidermal autograft. Linear regression demonstrated no decrease in cell density when preparing up to 14 biopsies of SCS with a positive slope, indicating further samples are feasible. Analysis of variance and Student's t-test of the first and last enzyme use per surgery found no significant differences. The only factor affecting cell counts was live feedback to surgical technologists preparing samples. Motivation of those performing the isolation had more effect than enzyme reuse, age, or number of surgeries. This modification prevented the hospital from purchasing 19 ReCell kits, saving approximately $130 625 in 1 month. Our results show 1 enzyme can be used at least 7 times without a decrease in cell yield or compromise of clinical outcome, demonstrating repeated use of SCS is a cost-effective, safe, and feasible option to augment skin grafting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"1516-1523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spray cell suspension (SCS) represents a commonplace tool to augment skin grafting; however, the kit required to make the suspension is costly. We hypothesize that repeated use of SCS will result in similar cell counts and graft results while decreasing hospital charges. Our institution used the enzyme from one ReCell kit repeatedly while counting cell dosage and tracking clinical outcomes. Six patients aged 8-86 years, with TBSA 8%-50% and Baux scores of 18-144, had 9 surgeries with SCS. All survived to discharge with 95% wound closure from 7 to 21 days after the first grafting (mode 7 days). Cell dosing was 20 716 ± 2346 cells/cm2. This is 1/3829th the dose of cultured epidermal autograft. Linear regression demonstrated no decrease in cell density when preparing up to 14 biopsies of SCS with a positive slope, indicating further samples are feasible. Analysis of variance and Student's t-test of the first and last enzyme use per surgery found no significant differences. The only factor affecting cell counts was live feedback to surgical technologists preparing samples. Motivation of those performing the isolation had more effect than enzyme reuse, age, or number of surgeries. This modification prevented the hospital from purchasing 19 ReCell kits, saving approximately $130 625 in 1 month. Our results show 1 enzyme can be used at least 7 times without a decrease in cell yield or compromise of clinical outcome, demonstrating repeated use of SCS is a cost-effective, safe, and feasible option to augment skin grafting.

ReCell酶的重复使用不会降低喷雾细胞悬浮液的密度,同时显著降低成本。
喷雾细胞悬浮液(SCS)代表了一种常见的工具,以增加皮肤移植;然而,制造悬浮所需的工具是昂贵的。我们假设反复使用SCS会导致相似的细胞计数和移植结果,同时降低医院费用。我们的机构在计算细胞剂量和跟踪临床结果时反复使用来自一个ReCell试剂盒的酶。6例患者年龄8 ~ 86岁,TBSA 8 ~ 50%, Baux评分18 ~ 144分,接受了9次SCS手术。第一次移植术后7-21天(模式7天)全部存活出院,95%伤口愈合。细胞剂量为20 716 +/- 2346细胞/cm2。这是培养表皮自体移植物(CEA)剂量的1/3829。线性回归显示,当制备多达14个SCS活组织切片时,细胞密度没有下降,斜率为正,表明进一步取样是可行的。每次手术的第一次和最后一次酶使用的方差分析和学生t检验没有发现显著差异。影响细胞计数的唯一因素是对准备样本的外科技术人员的实时反馈。进行分离的动机比酶重复使用、年龄或手术次数更有效。这一修改使医院无法购买19套ReCell设备,在1个月内节省了大约130 625美元。我们的研究结果表明,一种酶可以使用至少7次而不会降低细胞产量或损害临床结果,表明重复使用SCS是一种成本有效,安全可行的选择,可以增加皮肤移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书