Salar Javanshir, Isabella Angeli-Pahim, Pavan Iyengar, Anastasia Chambers, Iulia M. Smarandache, Rishiraj Ganguli, Abhishek Shrestha, Jessica Squadrito, Adriana Abreu, Gabrielle Suchan, Carl Rizk, Fahreddin Palaz, Steven J. Hughes, Ilyas Sahin, Joseph R. Grajo, Sergio Duarte, Ali Zarrinpar
{"title":"Using cell-free DNA tumor methylation score to detect and monitor cholangiocarcinoma","authors":"Salar Javanshir, Isabella Angeli-Pahim, Pavan Iyengar, Anastasia Chambers, Iulia M. Smarandache, Rishiraj Ganguli, Abhishek Shrestha, Jessica Squadrito, Adriana Abreu, Gabrielle Suchan, Carl Rizk, Fahreddin Palaz, Steven J. Hughes, Ilyas Sahin, Joseph R. Grajo, Sergio Duarte, Ali Zarrinpar","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is characterized by late or unclear diagnosis, high recurrence rates, and limited options for noninvasive disease monitoring. The widely used serum biomarker CA 19-9 has suboptimal sensitivity and specificity, underscoring the need for more accurate and reliable quantitative measures of tumor burden. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation represents a promising approach for longitudinal disease monitoring.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this single-center cohort study, we evaluated a cfDNA methylation-based Tumor Methylation Score (TMS) for detecting and monitoring CCA. Twenty-five patients with histologically confirmed CCA and twelve controls with benign hepatobiliary conditions were enrolled, yielding 100 plasma samples and 26 tissue samples. cfDNA methylation was quantified across 537 cancer-associated CpG loci by qPCR method, and TMS was calculated from the difference in methylation in paired plasma and buffy coat samples. For tissue samples, TMS was calculated by quantifying methylation in tumor and background liver separately. Response to treatment was assessed using blinded radiographic review. Tissue-based validation was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas and 4 additional GEO cohorts. Finally, cellular pathways associated with the panel genes were explored using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TMS was significantly elevated in CCA samples compared with controls in both tissue (P = 0.007) and plasma (P < 0.0001). Plasma TMS distinguished CCA from controls with a sensitivity of 74.3% and specificity of 80% (AUC = 0.823), while CA 19-9 showed no discriminatory value. TMS decreased consistently following curative resection. Longitudinal changes in TMS (ΔTMS) robustly distinguished radiographic progression from non-progression during systemic therapy (AUC = 0.968), outperforming ΔCA 19–9. Tissue-based analyses across independent cohorts confirmed cancer specificity and association with adverse outcomes. IPA identified HOXA9 as a significantly altered gene implicated in CCA carcinogenesis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Quantitative cfDNA methylation monitoring using TMS is feasible and accurately reflects dynamic tumor burden in CCA. TMS may serve as a complementary adjunct to imaging and CA 19–9 for diagnosis, prognosis, and longitudinal disease monitoring, warranting validation in larger prospective studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"28 8","pages":"Pages 1125-1135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hpb","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365182X26006167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is characterized by late or unclear diagnosis, high recurrence rates, and limited options for noninvasive disease monitoring. The widely used serum biomarker CA 19-9 has suboptimal sensitivity and specificity, underscoring the need for more accurate and reliable quantitative measures of tumor burden. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation represents a promising approach for longitudinal disease monitoring.
Methods
In this single-center cohort study, we evaluated a cfDNA methylation-based Tumor Methylation Score (TMS) for detecting and monitoring CCA. Twenty-five patients with histologically confirmed CCA and twelve controls with benign hepatobiliary conditions were enrolled, yielding 100 plasma samples and 26 tissue samples. cfDNA methylation was quantified across 537 cancer-associated CpG loci by qPCR method, and TMS was calculated from the difference in methylation in paired plasma and buffy coat samples. For tissue samples, TMS was calculated by quantifying methylation in tumor and background liver separately. Response to treatment was assessed using blinded radiographic review. Tissue-based validation was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas and 4 additional GEO cohorts. Finally, cellular pathways associated with the panel genes were explored using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA).
Results
TMS was significantly elevated in CCA samples compared with controls in both tissue (P = 0.007) and plasma (P < 0.0001). Plasma TMS distinguished CCA from controls with a sensitivity of 74.3% and specificity of 80% (AUC = 0.823), while CA 19-9 showed no discriminatory value. TMS decreased consistently following curative resection. Longitudinal changes in TMS (ΔTMS) robustly distinguished radiographic progression from non-progression during systemic therapy (AUC = 0.968), outperforming ΔCA 19–9. Tissue-based analyses across independent cohorts confirmed cancer specificity and association with adverse outcomes. IPA identified HOXA9 as a significantly altered gene implicated in CCA carcinogenesis.
Conclusions
Quantitative cfDNA methylation monitoring using TMS is feasible and accurately reflects dynamic tumor burden in CCA. TMS may serve as a complementary adjunct to imaging and CA 19–9 for diagnosis, prognosis, and longitudinal disease monitoring, warranting validation in larger prospective studies.
期刊介绍:
HPB is an international forum for clinical, scientific and educational communication.
Twelve issues a year bring the reader leading articles, expert reviews, original articles, images, editorials, and reader correspondence encompassing all aspects of benign and malignant hepatobiliary disease and its management. HPB features relevant aspects of clinical and translational research and practice.
Specific areas of interest include HPB diseases encountered globally by clinical practitioners in this specialist field of gastrointestinal surgery. The journal addresses the challenges faced in the management of cancer involving the liver, biliary system and pancreas. While surgical oncology represents a large part of HPB practice, submission of manuscripts relating to liver and pancreas transplantation, the treatment of benign conditions such as acute and chronic pancreatitis, and those relating to hepatobiliary infection and inflammation are also welcomed. There will be a focus on developing a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, radiological interventions and surgical techniques being strongly represented. HPB welcomes submission of manuscripts in all these areas and in scientific focused research that has clear clinical relevance to HPB surgical practice.
HPB aims to help its readers - surgeons, physicians, radiologists and basic scientists - to develop their knowledge and practice. HPB will be of interest to specialists involved in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease however will also inform those working in related fields.
Abstracted and Indexed in:
MEDLINE®
EMBASE
PubMed
Science Citation Index Expanded
Academic Search (EBSCO)
HPB is owned by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and is also the official Journal of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA), the Asian-Pacific Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) and the European-African Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).