Antidrug Antibodies and Serum Etanercept Levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review.

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Anfal A Abdulla, Ali A Younis, Mohammed I Aladul
{"title":"Antidrug Antibodies and Serum Etanercept Levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Anfal A Abdulla, Ali A Younis, Mohammed I Aladul","doi":"10.2174/0115733971461589260523231223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objective: </strong>Etanercept is a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor used widely for rheumatoid arthritis. Because patients respond differently, clinicians have increasingly explored whether measuring drug levels and antidrug antibodies could help guide treatment. This review brings together what is currently known about etanercept immunogenicity, serum concentrations, and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring, with a particular focus on practice in resource-limited settings such as Iraq.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Major databases were searched (January 2010-June 2025) for clinical trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews of adults with rheumatoid arthritis receiving originator or biosimilar etanercept that reported antidrug antibodies, serum levels, or outcomes related to monitoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across randomized and real-world studies, etanercept generally showed low immunogenicity, with reported antidrug antibodies mostly below 15% and neutralizing antibodies rarely detected. Serum levels varied considerably between patients, and no robust therapeutic range could be defined. In most studies, etanercept concentrations did not consistently predict clinical response, and originator and biosimilar products appeared similar in terms of effectiveness and safety.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overall, these findings suggest that immunogenicity is not a major reason for etanercept treatment failure and that routine therapeutic drug monitoring is unlikely to help most patients. However, the evidence is heterogeneous, and real-world data from low- and middleincome countries, including Iraq, are still limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence supports etanercept and its biosimilars as low-immunogenic options for rheumatoid arthritis, where routine monitoring is usually unnecessary. A more practical strategy may be to reserve targeted testing for selected non-responders while strengthening pharmacovigilance and local real-world research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11188,"journal":{"name":"Current rheumatology reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current rheumatology reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733971461589260523231223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objective: Etanercept is a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor used widely for rheumatoid arthritis. Because patients respond differently, clinicians have increasingly explored whether measuring drug levels and antidrug antibodies could help guide treatment. This review brings together what is currently known about etanercept immunogenicity, serum concentrations, and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring, with a particular focus on practice in resource-limited settings such as Iraq.

Methods: Major databases were searched (January 2010-June 2025) for clinical trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews of adults with rheumatoid arthritis receiving originator or biosimilar etanercept that reported antidrug antibodies, serum levels, or outcomes related to monitoring.

Results: Across randomized and real-world studies, etanercept generally showed low immunogenicity, with reported antidrug antibodies mostly below 15% and neutralizing antibodies rarely detected. Serum levels varied considerably between patients, and no robust therapeutic range could be defined. In most studies, etanercept concentrations did not consistently predict clinical response, and originator and biosimilar products appeared similar in terms of effectiveness and safety.

Discussion: Overall, these findings suggest that immunogenicity is not a major reason for etanercept treatment failure and that routine therapeutic drug monitoring is unlikely to help most patients. However, the evidence is heterogeneous, and real-world data from low- and middleincome countries, including Iraq, are still limited.

Conclusion: Current evidence supports etanercept and its biosimilars as low-immunogenic options for rheumatoid arthritis, where routine monitoring is usually unnecessary. A more practical strategy may be to reserve targeted testing for selected non-responders while strengthening pharmacovigilance and local real-world research.

类风湿关节炎的抗药物抗体和血清依那西普水平:叙述性综述。
简介/目的:依那西普是一种广泛用于类风湿关节炎的肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂。由于患者的反应不同,临床医生越来越多地探索测量药物水平和抗药物抗体是否有助于指导治疗。这篇综述汇集了目前已知的依那西普免疫原性、血清浓度和治疗性药物监测的作用,特别侧重于在伊拉克等资源有限的环境中的实践。方法:检索主要数据库(2010年1月- 2025年6月),检索接受依那西普原药或生物类似药的成人类风湿关节炎患者的临床试验、观察性研究和系统评价,这些研究报告了抗药抗体、血清水平或与监测相关的结果。结果:在随机和现实世界的研究中,依那西普普遍表现出较低的免疫原性,报告的抗药抗体大多低于15%,中和抗体很少检测到。不同患者的血清水平差异很大,无法确定有效的治疗范围。在大多数研究中,依那西普的浓度不能一致地预测临床反应,原研药和生物仿制药在有效性和安全性方面似乎相似。讨论:总的来说,这些发现表明免疫原性不是依那西普治疗失败的主要原因,常规的治疗药物监测不太可能帮助大多数患者。然而,证据是不同的,来自包括伊拉克在内的低收入和中等收入国家的真实数据仍然有限。结论:目前的证据支持依那西普及其生物类似药作为类风湿性关节炎的低免疫原性选择,该类关节炎通常不需要常规监测。一种更实际的策略可能是,在加强药物警戒和当地实际研究的同时,对选定的无反应者保留有针对性的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Current Rheumatology Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on rheumatology and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in rheumatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书